|
|
On Nov 29, 5:32 am, Mark Shaw <ms...@bangnetcom.com> wrote:
> Recently I ordered an item fromwww.woot.com. I paid for and
> have received the item, and am happy with it.
>
> A few days later I received an unordered second shipment of the
> same item
|
|
|
Hi,
A sister of mine refused to sign a lease mailed to her a few times for
renewal. As a result, she received a "Deemed Lease" signed by a
landlord which she also did not sign or mail back. She is planning to
move out now because the management of thi
|
|
|
In article <emuvk318muutllva01ngfgf7igee29nahj@4ax.com>,
Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>Mike Jacobs wrote:
>> Frankly, though, it usually happens the other way around. The
>> purported "victim" is actually not a 13 year old girl
|
|
|
On Nov 30, 6:59 am, Stuart Bronstein <spamt...@lexregia.com> wrote:
> David Chesler wrote:
> > I'll leave it to you net.lawyers to discuss IIED, but teenage
> > breakups are very usual, even cruel breakups. (Plus the usual
> > "you've got to be crue
|
|
|
Barry Gold wrote:
> Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>> That "second offense[...]following a first offense" just doesn't make
>> sense if they're prosecuted at the same time since you can't say "well,
>> this is a second offense" if the 1st h
|
|
|
On 29 Nov 200, lolajoker@webtv.net wrote:
> I appealed a speeding ticket conviction and filed everything
> within the prescribed deadlines including my opening brief.
> The Respondent (the county DA) had twenty days to file
> their answer brief. 9
|
|
|
Barry Gold wrote:
> ...
>
> If the continued trial date is more than 45 days after the ticket, you
> might want to call up the court clerk (or wait in the incredibly long
> lines to see a clerk) and find out the procedure for applying for a
> dism
|
|
|
On Nov 30, 6:59 am, lolajo...@webtv.net wrote:
> I appealed a speeding ticket conviction and filed everything within the
> prescribed deadlines including my opening brief. The Respondent (the
> county DA) had twenty days to file their answer brief. 9 d
|
|
|
Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in
news:gmuvk3dlan2e5ujpipnmld3v5u3c8pl970@4ax.com:
> David Chesler wrote:
>
>> I'll leave it to you net.lawyers to discuss IIED, but teenage
>> breakups are very usual, even cruel breakups. (Plus
|
|
|
Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in
news:emuvk318muutllva01ngfgf7igee29nahj@4ax.com:
> Mike Jacobs wrote:
>> David Chesler <ches...@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
>>> What about whatever it is they charge the predators with in To
>>>
|
|
|
On Nov 30, 6:59 am, Stuart Bronstein <spamt...@lexregia.com> wrote:
> Mike Jacobs wrote:
> > David Chesler <ches...@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >> What about whatever it is they charge the predators with in To
> >> Catch A Predator? Aren't those older
|
|
|
>Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
>>From my p.o.v., the problem here isn't that the cop was arresting the
>>driver. I don't see what other option he had. If you refuse to sign
>>the ticket and the cop just lets you drive away, then you have to
>>ob
|
|
|
In article <gmuvk3dlan2e5ujpipnmld3v5u3c8pl970@4ax.com>,
Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>
>Let's say you cause a minor traffic accident, bumping another car
>causing little more than scaped paint. Normally that would be no
>probl
|
|
|
David L. Martel <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote:
> You ordered an item (via the internet?). You received 2 instead of the
> ordered 1. You intend to return the unordered overage but ask what your
> legal rights and obligations are.
> Hard to an
|
|
|
On Nov 30, 6:59 am, lolajo...@webtv.net wrote:
> I appealed a speeding ticket conviction and filed everything within the
> prescribed deadlines including my opening brief. The Respondent (the
> county DA) had twenty days to file their answer brief. 9 d
|
|
|
Lola
> I appealed a speeding ticket conviction and filed everything within the
> prescribed deadlines including my opening brief. The Respondent (the
> county DA) had twenty days to file their answer brief. 9 days after that
> deadline they filed
|
|
|
John,
You hired a surveyor for $3500, paid in advance. They later sent you
a letter saying they were "confused with the title searching" -- it's
not to me clear how that's relevant to surveying. It was apparently
not clear to the judge either, si
|
|
|
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:32:37 -0500 from <kjaggi65@gmail.com>:
> I received a speeding ticket in San Jose, CA. Driving 55 in a 45 zone.
> I contested the ticket and requested a court appearance. I was given a
> time and date and when I showed up for my he
|
|
|
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:32:40 -0500 from Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net>:
> If you look at the original purpose of the law, it doesn't make sense
> to hit somebody for "second" (or "third", etc.) offense if all the
> offenses took place before the first trial.
|
|
