|
|
I've been trying to puzzle out the legality of ripping. The RIAA used to
say:
it’s perfectly lawful to take a CD that you’ve purchased, upload it
onto your computer, put it onto your iPod.
And that's always perplexed me a little bit sinc
|
|
|
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:57:15 -0500 from
<joeymajoristhevillageidiot@yahoo.com>:
> A co-worker of mine lied on his application form- could he get in
> trouble for this?
>
> The reason I dislike the guy so much is that I got into a dispute
> with him
|
|
|
On Dec 15, 7:49 am, grendal <im_gu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't seen a case where a business was held liable by the RIAA,
> however that doesn't mean that they couldn't go after you.
> To date, I've only seen cases where the homeowner had an op
|
|
|
Hello, my mom died 3 weeks ago in WA state. I'm an only child and sole
beneficiary after my dad, who's deceased, as stated in her will. She
owed nothing but maybe there's medical stuff still to come.
We moved her house into JTROS 2 months ago and it wa
|
|
|
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:27:35 -0500 from dpb60 <dpb60@yahoo.com>:
> my parents put in there trust and or will < trust I think >
> that if anyone named the trust contests it
> they will get nothing
> is this clause defendable in court in California
> ca
|
|
|
A co-worker of mine lied on his application form- could he get in
trouble for this?$B!!!!(BOn his application form he wrote that he had was a
university for two years then after two graduated. Of course he
dropped out. In fact he freely admits
|
|
|
In article <4403m317fhadgscmuqliojfhero2rta94o@4ax.com>,
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>The scenario you describe is as common as dirt. Home improvement
>contractors crap out on customers like this all the time, so often
>that it is the
|
|
|
In article <d503m31dpqm5m5go2pprlutaa6a8ic2f2k@4ax.com>,
Matt Carter <r_q_einstein-mlm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>The judge then said something to this effect:
.. . .
> Looking at the
>certificate that the defendant tried to provide the plaintiff, I see
|
|
|
In article <q8j7m3hmgng3e9cconr11dja657p718ki0@4ax.com>,
grendal <im_gumby@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I haven't seen a case where a business was held liable by the RIAA,
>however that doesn't mean that they couldn't go after you.
Starting with Starbuck
|
|
|
In article <tn6am3p8jn6k0e8nb82e0es6kn82pqdso6@4ax.com>,
Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>In article <48j7m352pj09ag6hia9dnq37bjvkq6tifl@4ax.com>,
>A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Law school exam question:
|
|
|
In article <toqcm3hi9p992ogsci6r0qblb1qqki4j83@4ax.com>,
dpb60 <dpb60@yahoo.com> wrote:
>my parents put in there trust and or will < trust I think >
>that if anyone named the trust contests it
>they will get nothing
>is this clause defendable in c
|
|
|
On 17 Dec 2007, Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote:
> My guess is that [the OP] is legally responsible
> [for his wife's credit card debt] simply because
> the flow of his post implies that his wife racked
> up the charges during t
|
|
|
On 17 Dec 2007, David Chesler <chesler@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Stan Brown <the_stan_br...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>
>> * * * the "takings" clause of the Fifth [and
>> Fourteenth] Amendment[s] restricts the ability
>> of governments to pass zon
|
|
|
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 07:34:56 -0500, Paul Cassel wrote:
> Mike Jacobs wrote:
>> On Dec 14, 7:06 am, Paul Cassel <pcasselremo...@comremovecast.net>
>> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Let's say the house is listed at $100k. If I make an offer of $100k, =
I
>>> wou
|
|
|
On 17 Dec. 17, 2007, <dpb60 <dpb60@yahoo.com> wondered:
> my parents put in there trust and or will
> < trust I think > that if anyone named the
> trust contests it they will get nothing
>
> is this clause defendable in court in California
> can
|
|
|
dpb60 <dpb60@yahoo.com> wrote:
>my parents put in there trust and or will < trust I think >
>that if anyone named the trust contests it
>they will get nothing
>is this clause defendable in court in California
>can the people truly not contest this
|
|
|
On Dec 16, 7:34 am, Paul Cassel <pcasselremo...@comremovecast.net>
wrote:
> Mike Jacobs wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 7:06 am, Paul Cassel <pcasselremo...@comremovecast.net>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Let's say the house is listed at $100k. If I make an offer of $10
|
|
|
dpb60 <dpb60@yahoo.com> wrote in news:toqcm3hi9p992ogsci6r0qblb1qqki4j83@
4ax.com:
> my parents put in there trust and or will < trust I think >
> that if anyone named the trust contests it they will get nothing
> is this clause defendable in co
|
|
|
On Dec 16, 6:34 am, gor...@hammy.burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) wrote:
>
> SSID is not a security mechanism. Perhaps you were thinking of WEP
> (cracked) or WPA. It is possible to avoid broadcasting the SSID
> to any passing wardriver, but if you're
|
|
|
grendal <im_gumby@hotmail.com> wrote:
} On Dec 13, 1:00 pm, Bernie Cosell <ber...@fantasyfarm.com> wrote:
} > I'm wondering what sort of legal exposure a company might be getting in
} > danger of by providing [unfiltered/unregulated/free] open wirele
|
|
