|
|
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:42:02 -0500, Bernie Cosell
<bernie@fantasyfarm.com> wrote:
>I've been trying to puzzle out the legality of ripping....
>RIAA has reversed their opinion and that's got me thinking about it again.
The RIAA's position is highly
|
|
|
My son holds a note secured by a deed of trust (mortgage) on
non-exempt real property. When the debtor defaulted, he sued on the
note and secured a judgment which was abstracted in the county
records. Now the debtor is filing bankruptcy. What are my
|
|
|
On Dec 18, 10:42 am, Bernie Cosell <ber...@fantasyfarm.com> wrote:
> Does that seem like a reasonable analysis of the situation? [I'm guessing,
> based on it, that the court will *NOT* rule that "ripping" is legal].
>
> /Bernie\
>
Under the cop
|
|
|
On Dec 18, 6:57 am, se...@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
> In article <q8j7m3hmgng3e9cconr11dja657p718...@4ax.com>,
>
> grendal <im_gu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >I haven't seen a case where a business was held liable by the RIAA,
> >however that doesn't mea
|
|
|
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:54:40 -0500, bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
>. . . .
>If OP lives in a Community Property state (e.g., CA), then half of the
>"his wife's" property belongs to him, and half of "his" property
>belongs to his wife. [Ob Bur
|
|
|
On Dec 18, 8:41 am, ned nearing <notr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> Not sure what to do about the car. It's not addressed, except under
> the simple will which leaves everything to me. "affidavit of
> inheritance"? Or just file for lost title?
In most
|
|
|
On Dec 15, 4:49 am, Timothy <Timothy.Horri...@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
file bankruptcy on her behalf now... it's nothing to be
> ashamed of. That may mean, depending on the facts of your case and
> the laws in your state, that you will have to file ban
|
|
|
Is it possible to distribute tax deductions during distribution? I'm
the executor of an estate and probating the estate myself. I spoke
with my consulting attorney and he said he's never heard of this
before. When we prepared the house for sale we dona
|
|
|
On Dec 15, 4:49 am, Timothy <Timothy.Horri...@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
> Well, here is my layperson's opinion: when your wife passes (and
> hopefully she will recover and live many more years), the debts are
> taken over by her estate, which is basical
|
|
|
Don wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:45:14 -0800, Lorraine wrote
> (in article <bh1tl3dlk8doa96k2ra4ab26ghagf9e4jt@4ax.com>):
>
>> I paid someone (referred by a friend) to make repairs to my home. He
>> gave me price of $6,000 to do all of the repai
|
|
|
Grip wrote:
> On Dec 15, 5:49 am, soniab...@aol.com wrote:
>> Our business is opening a new office/location in another state.
>> Another company that is in the same exact business has operated in the
>> state we're moving for for 20 years. I want to k
|
|
|
Seth <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
[discussion of statutory distribution snipped]
>Suppose a man has $2 million cash, and $500,000 artwork. His will
>says "Wife gets $1.5 million cash, Museum gets artwork, Nephew gets
>$0.5 million cash, any challenger ge
|
|
|
In article <q35im3ps1mdiop17f2uhh0ms24t52ljsec@4ax.com>,
Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>In article <drgfm39s2qjhb716t5ce4kabs4bcfe816i@4ax.com>,
>Seth <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>>In article <tn6am3p8jn6k0e8nb82e0es6kn82pqdso6@4ax.c
|
|
|
Robert Bonomi wrote:
> The 'take it to the Post Office' rule language _is_ 'over 12 oz',
> not '13 oz or more', BTW. :)
I'm pretty sure the PO that I use has the number "13" in the notice and
not "12" (I'm gonna look again when I go back this
|
|
|
Gordon Burditt <gordonb.gpuum@burditt.org> wrote:
[previous discussion of In Terrorem clauses snipped]
>How abusive can such clauses be? Example:
>
>The estate is divided equally among 4 siblings. If any of them
>contests the will, the estate i
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2:00 pm, David Chesler <ches...@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
<snip>
>> but it was 16 ounces
>
> and also pretty sure the new rule began at, and always was, applicable
> to 13+ oz.
No, Mike, it did start at 16 and
|
|
|
In article <v35im3h1vclbuppmh2e0b1f27j9bf9tc8j@4ax.com>,
Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote:
>Could be but I don't think so. Before answering this (but after
>answering Mike) I called the broker. She's done nothing in her life but
|
|
|
On Dec 19, 7:54 am, bon...@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
> In article <1rgfm3heepcj2fg39m07f69q85ckhsp...@4ax.com>,
> Mike Jacobs <mjacobs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Meaning, the white guy who buys or rents the house (as long as he was
>
|
|
|
nospam@isp.com wrote:
} On 18 Dec 2007, Bernie Cosell <bernie@fantasyfarm.com> wrote:
}
} >I've been trying to puzzle out the legality of ripping.
} It was (and still is) "perfectly legal" because this -- merely making
} a personal copy for one
|
|
|
nospam@isp.com wrote:
} On 18 Dec 2007, Bernie Cosell <bernie@fantasyfarm.com> wrote:
}
} >I've been trying to puzzle out the legality of ripping.
} It was (and still is) "perfectly legal" because this -- merely making
} a personal copy for one
|
|
|
Seth wrote:
> Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>
>>There are some kinds of challenges that, if successful, do _not_
>>trigger such a clause. e.g. that the document is a forgery.
>
> If it's a forgery, the clause doesn't exist.
|
|
