|
|
On Jan 25, 5:50 am, oprah.cho...@gmail.com wrote:
> My condominium home owner assoc. president is being a real pain. He
> is threatening me with fines and legal action for violating one of
> the covenants. This has to do with putting a dish on my patio
|
|
|
"Robert M. Gary" <N7093v@gmail.com> wrote in
news:ob4up35v0q3ak5pf7psm2m5rjb8dp81h12@4ax.com:
> On Jan 25, 3:50=A0am, se...@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>
>> If the company says that you were fired for committing a criminal
>> offense, you need to see
|
|
|
jefferis <jefferis@petersonsales.net> wrote in
news:bb4up3lrvkveu79hdr36r6fisvs4175l6p@4ax.com:
> Concerning the coming shortfall in Social Security, there is talk of
> restricting benefits by means testing... My question concerns the
> constituti
|
|
|
>Concerning the coming shortfall in Social Security, there is talk of
>restricting benefits by means testing...
Why does Social Security get to discriminate on the basis of AGE?
>My question concerns the
>constitutionality of denying benefits to
|
|
|
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 06:45:18 -0500, bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com
(Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>. . . .
>There have been court cases where the person harmed by law-enforcement's
>'failure to act' have sued. and, in every instance, have lost.
>. . . .
|
|
|
On Jan 29, 6:44=A0am, "Robert M. Gary" <N70...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 25, 3:50=3DA0am, se...@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>
> > If the company says that you were fired for committing a criminal
> > offense, you need to see a lawyer about defamation.
|
|
|
I am working as a part-time food service employee while I am in the
process of filing disability.
My employer has repeatedly promised work hours to me and then suddenly
cut them due to business being slow, etc.etc.
I work under 25 hours/week and a
|
|
|
"Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:db4up35n0qheivialh1b5iair52mieprf6@4ax.com...
> In effect, the present method, with all its faults, is written in stone,
> and that's hard to erase and revise.
>
What I take away from th
|
|
|
Mark A wrote:
> ....
>
> Even if the
> homeowner/renter is allowed to put up a satellite dish on his patio, the HOA
> can demand that he apply for permission before doing so in order to make
> sure that the installation does conform to federal r
|
|
|
On 29 Jan 2008, , "John D" <djohn393one@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In this case two adult children are the only heirs.
Query whether you really do mean "heirs" as compared with the
deceased's only children who might not (or might) be "beneficiaries"
of
|
|
|
Alan wrote:
> This isn't meant to start a discussion on the morality or desirability of
> capital punishment.
>
>
> There are a number of legal challenges to lethal injection on the basis
> that's it's painful. Why isn't this a simple matter of
|
|
|
n 29 Jan 2008, bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) said:
> <nospam@isp.com> wrote:
>
>> bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>>
>>> An arbitrator resolves differences of
>>> opinion between the parties involved.
>>
>> Unle
|
|
|
Jefferies,
Your post should spark an interesting debate.
> Concerning the coming shortfall in Social Security, there is talk of
> restricting benefits by means testing...
There is already a sort of that going on: If you make too much during a
|
|
|
Lighthope wrote:
> Anyway, Condo associations, like homeowner associations, are an illegal
> violation of private property rights and should be fought on all fronts.
> But that is the subject for another thread.
How are they illegal when you ag
|
|
|
I made a lock-in loan deposit and when interest rates dropped I
canceled (within 3 business days) and went with another company. I
know some states require the deposit to be returned, is Washington
State on of them ? Thank you. Su
|
|
|
In article <vb4up31t7tnqmfcjus13mism0jns3qk8jm@4ax.com>,
Mark A <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>Most off duty police officers are required to carry a gun
In which states?
> (at least in their
>car) and respond in the case of crime happens in thei
|
|
|
In article <ecgrp3dbltitrossnjt2v600f48ttcgc08@4ax.com>,
Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote:
>First, the OP agreed to certain restrictions when he bought the condo. I
>think you can sign away your rights by private contract.
Yo
|
|
|
In article <ob4up35v0q3ak5pf7psm2m5rjb8dp81h12@4ax.com>,
Robert M. Gary <N7093v@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jan 25, 3:50=A0am, se...@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>
>> If the company says that you were fired for committing a criminal
>> offense, you need to see
|
|
|
[OP, Jeff, surmises that means testing of Social Security benefits may
be violative of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable
searches and seizures. OP further surmises that FICA collections are
not supported under the Sixteenth Amendment.]
|
|
|
On Jan 28, 6:51 am, "Alan" <alanb_lano2s...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> As a small business owner, we accept credit cards, so I called the bank that
> processes our transactions and asked if I could process a transaction as a
> charge or cash advance at my dis
|
|
|
In article <gb4up35bkl3755i25dh39sfhdsv0t3bmvv@4ax.com>,
troymello@gmail.com wrote:
> The question. I have a unit owner that is violating the bylaws. (His
> personal condo (liability) insurance has lapsed and he has failed to
> provide a copy of
|
|
|
On Jan 28, 6:51 am, "Alan" <alanb_lano2s...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Returning to California from a trip to Costa Rica, me and a friend each
> needed to pay an exit fee of $26 to the Costa Rican Airport Authority
<OP's bank treated this as a cash advance,
|
|
|
On Jan 28, 6:51 am, Mark Shaw <ms...@bangnetcom.com> wrote:
> A question has come up on another newsgroup about a police officer's
> duty to respond to crimes s/he witnesses, particlarly while off duty.
> For example: a cop is in a liquor store picking
|
|
|
On Jan 28, 6:51 am, jmcglothlin <jmcgloth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm just amazed how many places flat out tell me that by company
> policy they can't hire anyone fired for fighting.
While I am as puzzled by this as several of the other respondents
|
|
|
On Jan 29, 6:44 am, "John D" <djohn393...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In this case two adult children are the only heirs. If a person dies leaving
> all their money in a joint account the other owner of that account gets all
> the money in that account, right?
|
|
|
Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
> In article <ubgrp3p7qldjcvq61es5da6ra9fbjc64nh@4ax.com>,
> Mark Shaw <mshaw@bangnetcom.com> wrote:
> >A question has come up on another newsgroup about a police officer's
> >duty to respond to cr
|
|
|
On Jan 29, 6:44=A0am, jefferis <jeffe...@petersonsales.net> wrote:
> Concerning the coming shortfall in Social Security, there is talk of
> restricting benefits by means testing... =A0My question concerns the
> constitutionality of denying benefits to
|
|
|
troymello@gmail.com wrote:
> I am on the board for a small condo association - 12 units. In
> short, the bylaws allow the board to establish a monetary fine for
> enforce the bylaws. In the event we send a notice, it is stated
> that the fine is $
|
|
|
jefferis <jefferis@petersonsales.net> wrote:
> Concerning the coming shortfall in Social Security, there is talk
> of restricting benefits by means testing... My question concerns
> the constitutionality of denying benefits to those who have paid
>
|
|
|
> >So this must be crucial/important ?
> >What are the legal implications ?
Robert Bonomi wrote:
> An arbitrator resolves differences of opinion between the parties
> involved.
> The result will be somewhere between the limits (inclusive) of t
|
|
|
bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
> <nospam@isp.com> wrote:
>> bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>>
>>> An arbitrator resolves differences of opinion
>>> between the parties involved.
>>
>>Unless and to whatever
|
|
|
John D
> In this case two adult children are the only heirs. If a person dies
> leaving
> all their money in a joint account the other owner of that account gets
> all
> the money in that account, right?
There are many banks with many set
|
|
|
"Stuart Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in message
news:lb4up3pu8vascrp1avmj16o0p7bfih2s68@4ax.com...
> Actually Dick is correct - what he states is the general rule and it
> applies unless there is a specific rule that supercedes it.
>
> I
|
|
|
John D wrote:
> In this case two adult children are the only heirs. If a person dies leaving
> all their money in a joint account the other owner of that account gets all
> the money in that account, right? Is that the end of it, or does the other
> h
|
|
|
Mark A wrote:
>
>
> I believe you are 100 % wrong about that. The homeowner/renter cannot sign
> away their right to erect a satellite dish because the law that allows it is
> specifically dealing with anti-trust issues.
OK, let's say he can
|
|
