|
|
On Feb 4, 6:30 am, "David L. Martel" <marte...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Kelley,
>
> You have recently discovered that a fairly successful book that you
> authored is being published (in translation) in a foreign country without
> permission. You as
|
|
|
>I received a fraudulent charge on my phone bill which was a call to a 900
>number and had a charge of $35.00.
This same sort of thing seems to be done on cell phones with text
messaging a lot. Because "they" got your number, "they" seem to
think
|
|
|
On Feb 5, 5:24 am, "George Ewart" <gew...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I received a fraudulent charge on my phone bill which was a call to a 900
> number and had a charge of $35.00.
[SNIP]
>
> If you see any 900 charges on your phone bill and it goes back t
|
|
|
On Feb 5, 5:24 am, ulbhpy <benaka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My neighbor shares a common fence with me which is in my property per
[snip]
And they say that fences make good neighbors.
Look, if the fence is on your property, its your fence.
You're l
|
|
|
On Feb 5, 5:23 am, Troy <troyme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Grendal,
>
[SNIP]
> 1. Bylaws require it.
> 2. As a unit owner myself, I would want the board to enforce it. I
> want to know that if the building burns down, it can be rebuild in
> whole.
|
|
|
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:24:00 -0500, ulbhpy <benakatti@gmail.com>
wrote:
>My neighbor shares a common fence with me which is in my property per
>survey.
(neighbor==jerk story snipped)
>Any practical ideas short of going to court (which I would
|
|
|
On Feb 4, 4:30=A0am, " ." <header_mun...@nullldomain.com> wrote:
> I have to turn in school papers into a website that analyzes them for
> plagerism. I do not have an option to not use this site. I am
> colorblind, and have dificulty matching component
|
|
|
On Feb 5, 3:23=A0am, Cysa <serge.arsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm in a jam and don't where to start with this. =A0I have a business
> that is incorporated from which I own 70% and my partner 30%. =A0The
> business has been operating for a few months no
|
|
|
On Feb 5, 6:23=A0am, Cysa <serge.arsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm in a jam and don't where to start with this. =A0I have a business
> that is incorporated from which I own 70% and my partner 30%. =A0The
> business has been operating for a few months no
|
|
|
Cysa wrote:
[unhappy with business partner]
> Now since I own
> 70%, I'm assuming i have the legal right to vote that partner out, am
> i right? or is it more complicated than that. Also I'm thinking of
> giving an option to buy my partners sha
|
|
|
My relative lives in Canada. They are Canadian citizens. We live in
California and are US Citizens. For some reason, and with mutual agreement,
we are planning to host their children (three, all below 8 years) live with
us for next academic year. We
|
|
|
In article <3phgq3p52vr0c12bjtbrsd2e7jc2u0bfj5@4ax.com>,
Troy <troymello@gmail.com> wrote:
>2. As a unit owner myself, I would want the board to enforce it. I
>want to know that if the building burns down, it can be rebuild in
>whole. The master
|
|
|
On Feb 5, 6:23 am, Cysa <serge.arsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm in a jam and don't where to start with this. I have a business
> that is incorporated from which I own 70% and my partner 30%
First of all, it's not a partnership, it's a corporation.
|
|
|
In article <gphgq39flucsqhbu79v1ujact9cso19gvd@4ax.com>,
ulbhpy <benakatti@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any practical ideas short of going to court (which I would like to
> avoid since I did not have agreement in writing)? Thanks. If
> nothing
> else let
|
|
|
In article <1phgq3driv55li4p1sq6r2jtgjs1b0ojpo@4ax.com>,
Cysa <serge.arseneau@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm in a jam and don't where to start with this. I have a business
> that is incorporated from which I own 70% and my partner 30%. The
> business ha
|
|
|
Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:30:47 -0500 from .
<header_munger@nullldomain.com>:
> I have to turn in school papers into a website that analyzes them for
> plagerism.
The word is "plagiarism". Is this turnitin.com, by any change?
> I do not have an opt
|
|
|
Rich Carreiro <rlc-news@rlcarr.com> wrote:
> mechphisto@gmail.com writes:
>
>> I may be wrong, but I heard somewhere (probably on t3h
>> Intertubes) that there was a U.S. law that prevents any company
>> from making any business decisions which woul
|
|
|
Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:23:55 -0500 from Mike Jacobs
<mjacobslaw@gmail.com>:
> Other than that, the landlady is entitled to collect the full
> agreed rent from whomever happens to be occupying her flat. This is
> not some hostel where you "pay by the bed
|
|
|
Troy <troymello@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stuart Bronstein <spamt...@lexregia.com> wrote:
>
> You know... I'll bet that would help. Did not even notice I
> hadn't mentioned it. It is Kentucky.
Thanks. Here's a quote from a recent Kentucky appellate
|
|
|
Cysa,
You're in a 70-30 partnership (you hold the 70%) and it's not working
out. It's not clear if there are other partners besides the two of
you, because sometimes you say "my partners".
No, just owning 70% does not let you squeeze out the oth
|
|
|
Benkatti,
You and your neighbor agreed orally to split the cost and "effort"
(whatever that is) of rebuilding a fence located on your property
near your boundary with his. When you approached him for payment he
refused -- not outright, but makin
|
|
|
Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com wrote:
> [A tangent to the original topic examines whether the Treasury
> securities held in the Social Security trust fund are valuable.
> D.F. Manno says, "[T]he Treasury securities in the SS Trust Fund
> are worthless? That'
|
|
|
ben,
You have a fence which you regard as a common fence. Recently you entered
into oral agreements with various neighbors to replace this fence. You have
done so. One of the neighbors has not paid for his share of the work.
This sounds like
|
|
|
Cysa,
You are in a partnership for business purposes. You are the majority
owner of the business. You wish to get rid of your partner since you believe
that he is not a good worker for the company. You ask for advice.
When a partnership is f
|
|
