|
|
On Feb 9, 7:07 am, Timothy <Timothy.Horri...@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
> Another argument you and your brother can use is that the debt was
> discharged during the bankruptcy. The bank was informed of the
> bankruptcy, and they certainly could have argue
|
|
|
On Feb 9, 4:08=A0am, gordonb.gl...@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) wrote:
> Does California have "escheat" laws, requiring abandoned property to
> be turned over to the state? =A0I'm thinking of this scenario: =A0if the
> account was supposed to have be
|
|
|
In article <1phgq3driv55li4p1sq6r2jtgjs1b0ojpo@4ax.com>,
Cysa <serge.arseneau@gmail.com> wrote:
> [[ a tale of woe about a corporate business relationship gone bad]]
There are two separate issues here.
1) "partner's" participation in the day
|
|
|
On Feb 9, 6:07 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
> Kelley Eidem <awthraw...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:vacoq35t9khm5tmbl5r4qng6jh85f469rg@4ax.com:
>
> > On Feb 7, 6:02 am, Paul Cassel <pcasselremo...@comremovecast.net>
> > wrote:
> >> Kelley Eidem wrote:
|
|
|
In article <tphgq3lptb0ciheoduuvobijnuv4vlj15l@4ax.com>,
day dreaming <oldspice4002@yahoo.com> wrote:
>It is in an one-party consent state, NY. What is your expert advice?
>
_MY_ expert advice (worth at least what you paid for it) is: if you want
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:40:12 -0500 from Gordon Burditt
> <gordonb.kns0r@burditt.org>:
>> When, on average, a person gets back more than they paid in, there's
>> an inherent problem in the system.
>
> Not so. Mutual insurance comp
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:39:52 -0500 from Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com>:
>> "Graffiti" was also one of the suggestions. What comes to mind is
>> painting "my neighbor is a scum-sucking <obsenity deleted>" on the
>> neighbor's side o
|
|
|
I live in Pennsylvania. When I was a kid in the 80's, I had a
"rhinoplasty" by a Philadelphia-based "cosmetic surgeon" who later was
the subject of a 20/20 "cosmetic-surgery-isn't-plastic-surgery-and-wow-
is-there-a-difference" story.
The man (who ma
|
|
|
Timothy <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
> Another argument you and your brother can use is that the debt was
> discharged during the bankruptcy. The bank was informed of the
> bankruptcy, and they certainly could have argued at that time th
|
|
