|
|
n Feb 14, 7:11 am, stephen <srdiam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One event demolished the State Bar establishment's effective reliance
> on disbarment as a mark of Cain, to anchor coercive power:
Um, where are you coming from on this? That's a pretty extr
|
|
|
stephen" <srdiamond@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:stb8r3hj27rnpppf3grnpb6loeuj46655j@4ax.com...
> One event demolished the State Bar establishment's effective reliance
> on disbarment as a mark of Cain, to anchor coercive power: the 5-year
> disba
|
|
|
In article <stb8r3hj27rnpppf3grnpb6loeuj46655j@4ax.com>,
stephen <srdiamond@gmail.com> wrote:
>One event demolished the State Bar establishment's effective reliance
>on disbarment as a mark of Cain, to anchor coercive power: the 5-year
>disbarment of
|
|
|
This has to do with what *actually* takes place when someone
with Mutual Fund holdings has specified a small charity as beneficiary
for "Transfer On Death" and later dies.
"Transfer On Death" is widely billed as an effective method
of avoiding dr
|
|
|
>Does a patient have any recourse if their medical insurance claims the fee
>for recent Mohs surgery for skin cancer was $600 above what is considered
>"reasonable and customary" for my region (San Diego)?
>
>If I have no option but to pay I can gru
|
|
|
On Feb 14, 7:11 am, Stan Brown <the_stan_br...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> As far as I know, consummation isn't legally relevant any more,
> whatever may have been the case a couple of centuries ago.
We're comparing apples and oranges here again.
Whet
|
|
|
On Feb 14, 7:11=A0am, stephen <srdiam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One event demolished the State Bar establishment's effective reliance
> on disbarment as a mark of Cain, to anchor coercive power: the 5-year
> disbarment of a sitting U.S. President, when th
|
|
|
"Dick Adams" <rdadams@panix.com> wrote in message
news:atb8r31tuvqeeu15cruvntbacepi0gd328@4ax.com...
> If it is true, it almost certainly was not appealed
> since obstinence is a divorce-seeking behavior.
>
> In 1979, I was at a New Year's Eve party
|
|
|
This is a reminder about the misc.legal.moderated policy on
submissions containing munged headers such as
From: biff@willy.NOSPAMloman.org
1. Posters are free to munge headers (leaving aside forgeries in the
name of an actual third party). Spammer
|
|
|
"Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> "Daniel R. Reitman" <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote
>> I'd like to see the citation for this one.
>>
>> Daniel Reitman
>
> Sorry, I don't have one. It was widely publicized in the media
> when it happened,
|
|
|
"Scott T." <anonymous@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0tb8r39vhoeaoas13vast3qlriclnugk6o@4ax.com...
| Does a patient have any recourse if their medical insurance claims the fee
| for recent Mohs surgery for skin cancer was $600 above what is considered
|
|
|
On Feb 14, 4:10=A0am, "Scott T." <anonym...@cox.net> wrote:
> Does a patient have any recourse if their medical insurance claims the fee=
> for recent Mohs surgery for skin cancer was $600 above what is considered
> "reasonable and customary" for my
|
|
|
On Feb 14, 4:11=A0am, Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> Back in 1995-96 my girlfriend stayed overseas for several months,
> close to a year.
>
> When she returned, the immigration officer's way to find out for how
> long she was outside of
|
|
|
stephen <srdiamond@gmail.com> wrote:
> One event demolished the State Bar establishment's effective
> reliance on disbarment as a mark of Cain, to anchor coercive
> power: the 5-year disbarment of a sitting U.S. President, when the
> Arkansas Suprem
|
|
|
Am I naive or are all 401k/IRA and primary residence assetts
untouchable by ANY court judgement against you? I assume one has to
declare bankruptcy if you dont have enough cash to pay ? Is there
anything wrong with declaring bankrupty if you never inte
|
|
