|
|
On Feb 11, 7:16 am, "David L. Martel" <marte...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> There are fairly strict statutes of limitation on malpractice today so
> most of your old surgeries are probably not actionable. Check this with a
> malpractice lawyer. Your l
|
|
|
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:23:54 -0500 Paul Cassel
<pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote:
| The ADA defines a qualifying disability as one which substantially
| limits one or more major LIFE activities. I'm skeptical that being color
| blind qualif
|
|
|
Peetie Wheatstraw <peetie.wheatstraw@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mr. X, with no wife, no children, wishes to bequest his mutual
> fund holdings to a small charity with limited personnel and a
> valid tax-exempt US fed tax ID. He somehow assumed that he
> co
|
|
|
CA Small Claims Court - Defective/Used Mattresses
I live in California.
I purchased 3 mattresses -- two for $275 each and one for $950.
Two days after they were delivered, I reported to the local store,
Mattress Gallery, that each mattress was d
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote in
news:hq5rq3p9mpkho96b53bmch4m6teodqrp22@4ax.com:
> Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:30:27 -0500 from Deadrat <a@b.com>:
>
>> The "relevant language" is in Thompson v Utah (1898), in which the
>> Supreme Court d
|
|
|
"Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
> The media reports of the case specifically stated that the judge
> mentioned the Mexican food issue in his ruling that granted
> annulment. And the judge granted an annulment, and not a divorce.
> My recollec
|
|
|
"Stuart Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in message
news:er0br35l2srt3ktajq9ddsg9gle38tp8nb@4ax.com...
> Ah, sort of like reverse common law marriage?
>
> Even in Texas the courts have ruled there is no such thing as common
> law divorce. S
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> Query to those who know, but as a corollary to this rule, if Bride
> is already pregnant at the altar, and Groom dies after saying "I
> do," ISTM that the child, when born, is considered Groom's
> legitim
|
|
