misc.legal.moderated

On 2008-03-20 04:23:23 -0700, Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> said: > Sorry, but whether a charge is made for legal services has no bearing > at all as to whether it is practicing law. None. > > The issue is the type of service provided,

In article <h197u3dc9kg1l70ogro0pbb8ina0i6v3g1@4ax.com>, Seth <sethb@panix.com> wrote: >In article <s7i4u39846ecqnc5lrcdf8sg17eeh04ors@4ax.com>, >Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: >>sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote: >>> Deadrat <a@b.com>

sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote in news:h197u3dc9kg1l70ogro0pbb8ina0i6v3g1@ 4ax.com: > In article <s7i4u39846ecqnc5lrcdf8sg17eeh04ors@4ax.com>, > Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: >>sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote: >>> Deadrat <a@b.com> w

On Mar 21, 7:05 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote: > Mike Jacobs <mjacobs...@gmail.com> wrote innews:g8i4u3l6gvm7kk1psq1c40gk4vletkj1dr@4ax.com: > > BTW, you are right that the first amendment generally prohibits any > > prior restraint on the content of

Dick Adams wrote: > > So just where does the practice of law begin? > I think it's a bit simpler than some of the replies you've gotten. I'd think that to engage in the practice of law which would be an illegal or unethical act you need to r

Seth wrote: > In article <s7i4u39846ecqnc5lrcdf8sg17eeh04ors@4ax.com>, > Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: >> sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote: >>> Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote: >>> >>>> *** I am not a lawyer, so this can't be legal advice. *

sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote: > Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: >> >>The issue is the type of service provided, and whether it takes >>legal reasoning, discretion and experience or education to do it >>properly. > > So if my fath

sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote: > Daniel R. Reitman <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote: >>sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote: >> >>>It isn't practicing law because you didn't charge for it. >> >>Most definitely not true. > > How is giving legal advice in con

On Mar 21, 8:05 am, bon...@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote: > note: Defense attorney has problems with _his_ plans, as well. "spousal > immunity" extends *only* to things that occurred _during_ the marriage. > Victim _can_ be compelled to

=86 cal wrote: > i live in Pa. Is it expensive to change ones last name------or does > anyone know what steps for me to take to start the procedure? >=20 Here is a resource for those who wish to DIY name change in PA: http://www.namechangelaw.com/

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:05:07 -0400, David Harmon <source@netcom.com> wrote: >On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:23:28 -0400 in misc.legal.moderated, >mike@nosam.org wrote, >>If one has Mediation in LA County (tenant-landlord matter) anything >>discussed appare

I'm incorporating a very small company, I have a few investors who will own maybe 5% of the company. Should I issue the remaining 95% of the stock to myself? Or should I issue some (most?) of the stock to myself and leave the rest with the corporation?

Seth <sethb@panix.com> wrote: > Suppose the legislature specifies that any penalty for UPL in such a > case is limited to a fine of $.01 with no add-ons. Then the perpetrator would be out one cent and would have a permanent criminal record. The lat

On Mar 21, 8:04=A0am, Stuart Bronstein <spamt...@lexregia.com> wrote: > David Chesler <ches...@post.harvard.edu> wrote: > > ObLegal: I'd like to see the reasoning of the courts that have > > held the terms of a ketubah unenforceable because it's religi

> In article <o7i4u315djfl5843gr51qr7a36k7ql0fr2@4ax.com>, > Mike Landorf <admin@forum.edina.mn.u_s> wrote: >> I agreed to host an event for the members of a non-profit organization >> in our house. ...Still, I don't like to circulate any disclaimers