|
|
Paul Cassel wrote:
> Dick Adams wrote:
>
>> So just where does the practice of law begin?
>>
>
> I think it's a bit simpler than some of the replies you've gotten. I'd
> think that to engage in the practice of law which would be an illegal or
|
|
|
William Brenner <wbrenner@nospamplease.net> wrote:
> And further, under that thinking, couldn't the
> downloading of a do it yourself will or trust
> form and filling it out for oneself or for another
> be considered practicing law? Actually, o
|
|
|
Don <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote in
news:o7s9u3pqr4nv59c833ungv9uofei9lli9h@4ax.com:
> On 2008-03-20 04:23:23 -0700, Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com>
> said:
>
>> Sorry, but whether a charge is made for legal services has no bearing
>> at a
|
|
|
Don <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote:
> Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> said:
>
>> Sorry, but whether a charge is made for legal services has no
>> bearing at all as to whether it is practicing law. None.
>>
>> The issue is the type of service
|
|
|
William Brenner <wbrenner@nospamplease.net> wrote:
> And further, under that thinking, couldn't the downloading of a do
> it yourself will or trust form and filling it out for oneself or
> for another be considered practicing law? Actually, one wou
|
|
|
Deadrat wrote:
> Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote in
> news:68i4u3desgj1mgg3ccsena64bcolih1lub@4ax.com:
>> Yes, in that it IS the opposite ("the negative of") in one
>> sense of the word "legal" but no, in that it doesn't cover the whole
>> sp
|
|
|
P wrote:-
> > Month Billed Correct
> > --------------------
> > 1 $11 $10
> > 2 $22 $20
> > 3 $33 $30
> > 4 $44 $40
> > 5 $55 $50
> >
> > Just before month-1 you've notified them that you're
> > withh
|
|
|
On Mar 21, 8:05 am, Stuart Bronstein <spamt...@lexregia.com> wrote:
> m...@nosam.org wrote:
> > If one has Mediation in LA County (tenant-landlord matter) anything
> > discussed apparently can not be brought up later in a trial per
> > Evidence Codes
|
|
|
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:44:37 -0400 in misc.legal.moderated,
mike@nosam.org wrote,
>The above link only gives me a blank screen. Is it correct? Do I
>have to sign up or something first to use the service?
I'm sorry, I keep forgetting the perversity
|
|
|
HankM <Hank@webfeats.com> wrote:
> I'm incorporating a very small company, I have a few investors who
> will own maybe 5% of the company. Should I issue the remaining 95% of
> the stock to myself? Or should I issue some (most?) of the stock to
> mys
|
|
|
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:23:50 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>>No, they most certainly do not. The practice of law is a matter within
>>the power of the judiciary branch and no other, except to the extent
>>the judiciary may occasionally tole
|
|
|
Keith F. Lynch wrote:
> Seth <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>> Suppose the legislature specifies that any penalty for UPL in such a
>> case is limited to a fine of $.01 with no add-ons.
>
> Then the perpetrator would be out one cent and would have a perma
|
|
|
"A Michigan Attorney" <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e68vt3102ol21rjqlgc45av8rjn8ae311e@4ax.com...
| On Mar 15, 8:00 am, "cray" <c...@nospam.com> wrote:
|
| > During a stay in the hospital for an unrelated cause, One acquire a
staph
|
|
|
A ketubah is a marriage contract all right, but it wouldn't be
"acknowledged before a judge of a court of record of this state by the
parties and witnesses in the manner required for the acknowledgment of
a conveyance of real estate to entitle the same
|
|
|
Daniel R. Reitman wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:58:16 -0400, Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Daniel R. Reitman wrote:
>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:40:31 -0400, David Chesler
>>> <chesler@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
>>> There is an A
|
|
|
On Mar 22, 7:44 am, Mike Landorf <ad...@forum.edina.mn.u_s> wrote:
> >> I agreed to host an event for the members of a non-profit organization
> >> in our house. ...Still, I don't like to circulate any disclaimers to
> >> be signed by participants.
|
|
