Q10: since the municipal accounting department just kept adding
legal charges and interest as well as further false billing charges
[which they previously admitted/explained as computer errors],
Ms Timely wrote:-
You are insufficiently clear here whether you are saying by "admitted
that they're over-billing by 10%" that the services seller stated on
the bills you go on to hypothesize (at least in substance if not in
these exact words), "We're over-billing by 10% and so you the customer
being billed are obliged to pay only 90% of the sum billed!" . . . or
saying little more than that an acquaintance had reported to you a
rumor or maybe that the press had reported but you had not proven in
the papers putatively in support of your motion as applying to you, in
particular, that the services supplier/seller plaintiff had made some
statements in respect of some other customers maybe at some times or
some places in your country elsewhere than at issue in the lawsuit
against you, it made approximately such errors . . . or that you are
If I write "they previously admitted/explained as computer errors",
then those are my facts - by definition - to be USED in answering
MY question. When the teacher asked you about "2 apples plus 2
apples" [as a hypothetical situation] it's not appropriate to tell that
'there are no apples', unless that follows logically. But since I've been
filing away some extracts of local law reports I noticed this:---
}VUMAZONKE vMEC SOC.DEV.EASTRN.CP & 3 SIMILAR CASES 2005(6) 229
} - Constitution placing duty on Judiciary to remedy such infractions,
}but Judiciary in Eastern Cape faced problem they cannot resolve: in
}spite of thousands of orders made against respondent's department,
}it willing to pay costs of applications rather than remedy problem of
}maladministration and inefficiency identified as root cause of problem
}230 I: in terms of reg 25(2)..The furnishing of reasons was a precondition
}for a valid exercise of power.
} 231B:..the 90-day period had not started running and, if the applicant
}wanted to appeal in the absence of reasons, she could do so at any time.
}233B: I deal with102 matters in which applicants claim relied in essentially
}similar terms against the Member of the Executive Council...Goverment.
If this law report of the Court orbiter doesn't satisfy you, the record
that since owning the property in 1968, I had no problems with false
municipal billing until the golliwogs were given political control
tells everything.
And if you want to claim it's so easy to fix, then "why haven't you yet
fixed little Haiti, which is just over the road" ?
Your heckling is blatantly politically motivated.
But that's OK, because you effectively filter out any possible errors
and ambiguities of my argument.
Thanks for input,
== Chris Glur.
