|
|
In article <7sbku3lenbv7024enu46spa9lbbmhrh3ta@4ax.com>,
Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote:
>sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote in news:nthhu31kl94fdpl886tj40s2m0vdl1j844@
>4ax.com:
>> The other is performing surgery. (Pulling a splinter is an
>> interesting cas
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote in
news:i71nu35la9klq5q0p5btfmra3nhd0mo4r2@4ax.com:
> On Mar 26, 7:15 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd say that surgery falls under "services." The state of Washington
>> says "penetrates the tiss
|
|
|
I read about this case in a "weird news" column. It's amusing, but I
didn't understand the legal reasoning, which seems to hinge on whether
Google is a "state actor."
http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2008/02/third_circuit_s.htm
I know a judge
|
|
|
In article <5sbku3d21qbbm6p0o6oehlgh4pk4p6aght@4ax.com>,
Casual Observer <"no_junk_mail;"@nowhere.com;;> wrote:
>A stationary exercise bike I purchased new has a "Residential Warranty", and
>it's noted at the top of the warranty, "Frame: Lifetime, Par
|
|
|
"David L. Martel" <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:h71nu3hm526l0nrppemf0iemb1jhs1ovtl@4ax.com...
> Casual,
>
> You recently purchased a product that has a warranty. The product may be
> defective. You ask for advice.
> Read the
|
|
|
On Mar 26, 7:15 am, "Casual Observer" <"no_junk_mail;"@nowhere.com;;>
wrote:
> Hopefully, when I talk with management at the company, they'll stand by
> their product and repair or replace it - if not, what's my chance of
> prevailing in small claim
|
|
|
On Mar 24, 7:39=A0am, NOS...@joinme.com wrote that he'd signed with a
bank that he guaranteed for a corporation in which he held stock "any
note now existing or any note hereafter arising." He wants to stop.
Is this an occasion where he could publis
|
|
|
On Mar 26, 7:15 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
> Infringe means to break. So regulations that bend but not to the breaking
> point would be OK.
>
> How come the state can't pass "any law" abridging freedom of speech, but
> contract to murder is sti
|
|
|
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:29:27 -0400 from Mike Jacobs
<mjacobslaw@gmail.com>:
> No one has to give any reason to exercise a
> peremptory challenge (unless the challenge is itself challenged as
> being racially or ethnically biased) and so no one but that
|
|
|
In article <mrbku3t3urn8i84hm2nuk5kk5opahu8e68@4ax.com>,
John <jhy001@earthlink.net> wrote:
>So why don't we hear about foreclosed home owners singling out
>companies, or even the individuals who did this for law suits?
Probably because the loan
|
|
|
mm <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> I think this question only applies to Maryland,
> but I know there are one or two regular posters
> here who know a lot about Maryland.
>
> When thumbing through the statute books, I've
> notice many sections
|
|
|
On Mar 26, 7:15 am, mm <NOPSAMmm2...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> But how is it constitutional at all to have laws that are specificed
> to apply only to one or more counties and not the whole state? What
> about the 14th Amendment?
if you can provide e
|
|
|
mm wrote:
> I think this quesiton only applies to Maryland, but I know there are
> one or two regular posters here who know a lot about Maryland.
>
> When thumbing through the statute books, I've notice many sections of
> the law that only apply to
|
|
|
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:15:02 -0400 from mm <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.com>:
> I think this quesiton only applies to Maryland, but I know there are
> one or two regular posters here who know a lot about Maryland.
>
> When thumbing through the statute books, I
|
|
|
>I was called for jury duty on a criminal case and was very happy to be
>dismissed on a peremptory challenge by the defendant's lawyer.
That means the defendant's lawyer didn't like you for some reason,
but don't take it personally. And he doesn't h
|
|
|
William Brenner <wbrenner@nospamplease.net> wrote:
> In a criminal case, in which I was foreman, the original vote was
> 5-1 for conviction. I was the 1. The final vote was 6-0 for
> acquittal. So it can work both ways.
Funny, you don't look lik
|
|
|
On Mar 27, 3:29 am, William Brenner <wbren...@nospamplease.net> wrote:
>
> I have had the same experience. It was explained to me that many defense
> attorneys do not care for educated former forepersons whose juries
> reached verdicts -- thinking tha
|
|
|
I am going to have to declare Ch 7 bankruptcy, and am considering
doing it on my own using a book published by Nolo. All was looking
manageable until I ran across something in the text that makes me
wonder whether the nature of my business makes the p
|
|
|
In article <271nu3ta195j6j0rvfj953tdqg97k2rlcv@4ax.com>,
Dick Adams <rdadams@panix.com> wrote:
>David Chesler <chesler@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> What if they never leave New York?
>
>They honeymooned in New York State? What a bummer!
When di
|
|
|
rdadams@panix.com (Dick Adams) wrote:
> Susan and I were married in a chapel on the campus of the
> University of Chicago (Cook County) by a Lake County judge. When
> her mother realized the judge was not authorized to perform the
> ceremony, she
|
|
