misc.legal.moderated

in the state of Louisiana if I use someone else's I.D. to access the state police mainframe, access criminal records of individual(s), and access autopsies and/or m.e.'s files? Thanks.

On Mar 15, 8:00=A0am, rdad...@panix.com (Dick Adams) wrote: > Where does the practice of law begin? > Is it illegal for a non-attorney to prepare > wills, financial plans, trust agreements, or > tax returns? =A0And the answer is NO to all of > the ab

In TV dramas and on Judge Judy (who seems like the antithesis of a normal judge) the judge is always being stern with the lawyers. After a sidebar when one lawyer is still pleading his case on some point, the judge always growls "Step back" like he

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:21:24 -0400, hcbowman <hcbowman@gmail.com> wrote: >I read about this case in a "weird news" column. It's amusing, but I >didn't understand the legal reasoning, which seems to hinge on whether >Google is a "state actor." > >

In article <43lpu3hrn3ri5cmgcjjob0l4r6g5jccsvb@4ax.com>, hcbowman <hcbowman@gmail.com> wrote: > I read about this case in a "weird news" column. It's amusing, but I > didn't understand the legal reasoning, which seems to hinge on whether > Google

On Mar 28, 7:21=A0am, hcbowman <hcbow...@gmail.com> wrote: > I read about this case in a "weird news" column. =A0It's amusing, but I > didn't understand the legal reasoning, which seems to hinge on whether > Google is a "state actor." > > http://blog

hcbowman <hcbowman@gmail.com> wrote in news:43lpu3hrn3ri5cmgcjjob0l4r6g5jccsvb@4ax.com: > I read about this case in a "weird news" column. It's amusing, but I > didn't understand the legal reasoning, which seems to hinge on whether > Google is a "

hcbowman wrote: > I read about this case in a "weird news" column. It's amusing, but I > didn't understand the legal reasoning, which seems to hinge on whether > Google is a "state actor." > > http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2008/02/third_circ

hcbowman wrote: > I read about this case in a "weird news" column. It's amusing, but I > didn't understand the legal reasoning, which seems to hinge on whether > Google is a "state actor." > A state actor is someone acting on behalf of the State.

On Mar 28, 7:21 am, hcbowman <hcbow...@gmail.com> wrote: > I read about this case in a "weird news" column. It's amusing, but I > didn't understand the legal reasoning, which seems to hinge on whether > Google is a "state actor." The US Constitutio

Cliff, >I read about this case in a "weird news" column. It's amusing, but I > didn't understand the legal reasoning, which seems to hinge on whether > Google is a "state actor." The URL you supplied des not answer your question. It just suppl

"Casual Observer" <"no_junk_mail;"@nowhere.com;;> wrote in message news:5sbku3d21qbbm6p0o6oehlgh4pk4p6aght@4ax.com... >A stationary exercise bike I purchased new has a "Residential Warranty", and > it's noted at the top of the warranty, "Frame: Lifet

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:29:44 -0400, "David L. Martel" <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote: >Casual, > > You recently purchased a product that has a warranty. The product may be >defective. You ask for advice. > Read the warranty. Does it mention t

David Chesler <chesler@post.harvard.edu> wrote: > NOS...@joinme.com wrote that he'd signed with a > bank that he guaranteed for a corporation in which he held stock "any > note now existing or any note hereafter arising." He wants to stop. > > Is

c <smalltalkingchicken@gmail.com> wrote: > Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote: >> How come the state can't pass "any law" abridging freedom of >> speech, but contract to murder is still illegal? > > freedom of speech is a regulated right > freedom of con

On 28 Mar 2008, Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote: > I'm curious about how [determining whether it > is/isn't more rather than less likely that a peremptory > challenge to a would be juror in a criminal case, if > unexplained, is the res

On Mar 28, 7:21 am, Stan Brown <the_stan_br...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:29:27 -0400 from Mike Jacobs > <mjacobs...@gmail.com>: > > > No one has to give any reason to exercise a > > peremptory challenge (unless the challenge is itself

> >But how is it constitutional at all to have laws that are specificed >to apply only to one or more counties and not the whole state? What >about the 14th Amendment? The 14th amendment does not grant rights to county governments. >Is there any

c <smalltalkingchicken@gmail.com> wrote: > mm <NOPSAMmm2...@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >> But how is it constitutional at all to have laws that are specificed >> to apply only to one or more counties and not the whole state? What >> about the 14th Amend

Stan Brown wrote: > http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/43const/html/const.html I took a QUICK glance at the MD state constitution at that link and thought it was kinda funny that they had mentioned off-street parking in Baltimore in the constituti

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:20:40 -0400, "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: >Getting back to the OP's question, jury consultants help lawyers >determine which jurors are likely to be helpful or hostile to their >cases. These determin

I was driving my brother's car in and around Dallas, and it was a stick and I wasn't used to that, so at the intersection of two trafficless streets, I rolled through a stop sign a little bit so as not to stall and got caught, in Grand Prairie, Texas,

In article <99fcu39ionpa0babm005ec9s5mfrltsahd@4ax.com>, henri <henri@nowhere.com> wrote: >On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:23:50 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote: > >>>No, they most certainly do not. The practice of law is a matter within >>>the power o

This evening when I arrived home I had a call from a person at Aurora, Gold and Associates on my answering machine. He said I needed to return his call, that I was a "person of interest" in a case involving a "John Smith" (name changed for this post),