|
|
On 2008-03-30 04:58:41 -0700, bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) said:
> In that _particular_ kind of a situation the defense puts the 'victim'
> on the stand, who testifies that there was "no doubt in his mind that
> the defendant was _not_
|
|
|
Robert Bonomi wrote:
<hiker cuts off his own arm that's trapped under a rock and is accused
of surgery without a license.>
> As a _practical_ matter, taking the facts as cited, the situation would
> never come up. There is _no_ "complaining witne
|
|
|
On Mar 29, 9:19=A0am, mm <NOPSAMmm2...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> In TV dramas and on Judge Judy (who seems like the antithesis of a
> normal judge) the judge is always being stern with the lawyers. =A0
>
> After a sidebar when one lawyer is still pleading
|
|
|
David L. Martel wrote:
> Cliff,
>
>> I read about this case in a "weird news" column. It's amusing, but I
>> didn't understand the legal reasoning, which seems to hinge on whether
>> Google is a "state actor."
>
> The URL you supplied des not
|
|
|
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:58:34 -0400, "David L. Martel"
<marte005@earthlink.net> wrote:
>mm,
>
>
>> Is he going to have trouble finding the proper name of entity he needs
>> to sue?
>
>
> I'm not sure since I don't have his warranty in front of
|
|
|
Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote:
>> And when more
>> than one person is involved, it is much more likely that the
>> crime will be committed (or at least attempted).
>
> Interesting. Do you have any evidence to back up this aside?
Just what they told
|
|
|
Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:58:30 -0400 from Deadrat <a@b.com>:
> But that's a pointless argument by definition. Laws against contract
> murder abridge freely speaking,
I don't see how that's true. Unless I'm mistaken,(*) I can say "I've
got $10,000 her
|
|
|
Hello,
I need an advice in a Kafka situation with my mortgage company and
would greatly appreciate any help. A couple years ago I changed my
hazard insurance. Two month ago I received an angry letter from the
bank, followed by even angrier within a
|
|
|
Stuart Bronstein wrote:
> Many countries don't use juries at all. In England they are only used
> for criminal cases. According to wikipedia peremptory challenges were
> finally abolilshed there in 1988. Here's the wikipedia article, that
> tal
|
|
|
On Mar 30, 7:57 am, "John A. Weeks III" <j...@johnweeks.com> wrote:
> In article <m9esu35dgd8p8tmusiod61ar8okafg0...@4ax.com>,
> Mark Shaw <ms...@bangnetcom.com> wrote:
> > How should I handle things when the guy calls back?
>
> Tell them that you w
|
|
|
In article <b00vu3h1j7kev2ek0sduqchfv1v573csqg@4ax.com>, aaaisp@techemail.com
(FinTech) writes:
[...]
| It was incorrectly stated
| by another poster that they could go after your bank accounts. That is
| entirely untrue in every state in the un
|
|
|
Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:57:45 -0400 from FinTech <aaaisp@techemail.com>:
> It was incorrectly stated by another poster that they could go
> after your bank accounts. That is entirely untrue in every state in
> the union.
"Entirely true", you mean. If yo
|
|
