misc.legal.moderated

On Apr 1, 11:45=A0am, kristinvando...@yahoo.com wrote: > I have been trying for a long time to find out if the "first offender > pardon" as provided by Louisiana La. Const. =A0Art. 4 Section 5 (E) (1) > qualifies as a pardon under 18 U.S.C. 921 (a) (20

On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:40:11 -0400, "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> wrote: >Been decades but a pardon granted by a state governor (in this case also >Louisiana) carries no weight with the feds. We had an employee that was >granted a pardon by a Louisiana

Hello, Sorry to bother you, but my ISP has no NNTP by which I can post to newsgroups. I've sent this to you after reading the Misc.Legal.Moderated Posting Instructions and Charter which say, in part, "If you can't post using news software, mail

In article <b6mmv3t8jn6l8ijroioqem9equ24i81hgk@4ax.com>, spamtrap@lexregia.com says... > Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote: > > Here's some speech: > > I PLAN TO complain about the fact that I KILL time playing video > > games, and and MY WIFE objects. >

Stuart Bronstein wrote: > Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote: > >> Here's some speech: >> >> I PLAN TO complain about the fact that I KILL time playing video >> games, and and MY WIFE objects. >> >> I'm sure you'll tell me that although the speaker has pron

In article <c6mmv3lfq89hipqrunai6kkp6rk6odo7n1@4ax.com>, Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote: >sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote in >news:5iihv3t48bnq2md1sghj3ltgbd2b950rvs@4ax.com: >> My point is that a contract does _not_ "boil down to words". A >> contract is

On 2008-03-29 05:47:21 -0700, Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> said: > The real crime is the intent and the conspiracy. Conspiracies are not > just words. They are partnerships to commit a crime. And when more > than one person is involved

Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in news:b6mmv3t8jn6l8ijroioqem9equ24i81hgk@4ax.com: > Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote: > >> Here's some speech: >> >> I PLAN TO complain about the fact that I KILL time playing video >> games, and and MY

Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote: > No meeting of the minds or a contract need exist, as some hapless > spouses have found out when attempting to hire an undercover cop > as a hitman. Exactly, and that's an argument against your contention that the First

On Apr 8, 7:37 am, se...@panix.com (Seth) wrote: > That leads to an interesting hypothetical. > > There's a condo of 100 separate units, with some common amenities > (tennis courts, swimming pool, and the like). The government takes 10 > units by

<rbendyke@hotmail.com> wrote: > ... > (What I found out after the trial was that both attorneys > already knew that the trial would take about a full day, > and that taking any more time than necessary might push > the trial into a second day. .

n article <qds1u3dv729j716i0h0cpld55tv60vk573@4ax.com>, Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: Sorry, I missed this reply, since I'm posting from dark[ening] africa. > problems@gmail wrote: > > henri wrote:- > >> problems@gmail wrote:

I may have gotten myself into a mess. I'm in Maryland. If someone might have the basis for a successful claim for adverse possession, for the required number of years, but hasn't pursued it in court, if I do something now that would have interrupted

I am a 30% minority shareholder in an LLC. The majority shareholder is another (parent) company that is wholly owned by a family and entirely controlled and micromanaged by the family patriarch and manager of of both the LLC and the parent company. Th

On Apr 4, 4:39 am, Mike Jacobs <mjacobs...@gmail.com> wrote: > Let me get this straight. You're reaching your hands over the wall > between yours and your neighbor's properties, onto the neighbor's > side, and spraying a noxious chemical onto the pav

On Apr 4, 4:39 am, bon...@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote: > If, on the other hand, the fence is entirely on your property, and the dog > is 'trespassing' onto your land _before_ reaching the fence, the situation > is materially different.

On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:37:31 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote: >In article <rkp4v3131dhlr1cg5bhe2be9dno60kepvu@4ax.com>, >Daniel R. Reitman <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote: >>On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:44:16 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote: >>{H

On Apr 8, 7:37 am, se...@panix.com (Seth) wrote: > In article <rkp4v3131dhlr1cg5bhe2be9dno60ke...@4ax.com>, > Daniel R. Reitman <dreit...@spiritone.com> wrote: > > >{Hypothesis: Legislation authorizes any person to draft wills for > >another, for

On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:06:09 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote: >Terms of use of this message: It may not be stored or read in North >Dakota. (see http://www.circleid.com/posts/811611_david_ritz_court_spam/ >for the reason.) > >In article <e00vu

Seth wrote: > In article <qs1kv3tt2ovgnmg6e69foleodhuvm6q27a@4ax.com>, > Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: >> Seth wrote: >>> Terms of use of this message: It may not be stored or read in North >>> Dakota. (see http://www.circleid.com/posts/81

John F. Carr wrote: > In article <qs1kv3tt2ovgnmg6e69foleodhuvm6q27a@4ax.com>, > Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: >>> In article <f8pev3hrojeve0f645o7c8aeheq4a10epc@4ax.com>, >>> Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote: >>>> A DMCA '

In article <qs1kv3tt2ovgnmg6e69foleodhuvm6q27a@4ax.com>, Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: >Seth wrote: >> Terms of use of this message: It may not be stored or read in North >> Dakota. (see http://www.circleid.com/posts/811611_david_ritz_court

In article <t5mmv3dal9q9ma3rrc1i2jrg2m701osb9c@4ax.com>, Seth <sethb@panix.com> wrote: >In article <ss1kv3plckfvuq9dsa14a75c18mf18mu6n@4ax.com>, >Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote: > >>When you get into 'publication', there is a large

henri <henri@nowhere.com> wrote: > bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote: >>Regardless of =your= opinion on the above, the _courts_ have held, >>repeatedly, that's one's physical likeness is protected. > > It may be protected, but it i

George, You signed a contract with a customer, and one provision is to use a particular invoice service to generate invoices. For reasons that are not quite clear to me, you have been unable to generate the first invoice (which will be over $10,0

On Apr 8, 6:37 am, curiousgeorge...@hotmail.com wrote: > I wonder if the contractual required was legal (enforceable), in > the first place. I learned later that the invoice service is a > subsidiary of the customer. In effect, the customer is char

In article <o5mmv35n7i1isvsaq6n21tli86g03us7k4@4ax.com>, <curiousgeorge408@hotmail.com> wrote: [tale of woe, re customer requirement, snipped] Can the customer _force_ you to do it? "No." Can the customer refuse to do business with you unless y

In article <o5mmv35n7i1isvsaq6n21tli86g03us7k4@4ax.com>, curiousgeorge408@hotmail.com wrote: > When I signed a contract for some consulting work, I agreed to > the customer's requirement that I use a particular electronic > service for submitting i

On Apr 8, 7:37 am, curiousgeorge...@hotmail.com wrote: > When I signed a contract for some consulting work, I agreed to > the customer's requirement that I use a particular electronic > service for submitting invoices. <customer's billing system doe

George, You work as a consultant. You were hired by a company, A, and in the contract was the stipulation that all billing be handled by company B. B is making a mess of the billing. Raise this issue in writing with A. Make your offer of a p

Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:38:56 -0400 from John A. Weeks III <john@johnweeks.com>: > To present a defense, no only will the > driver have to state that he wasn't driving at the time of the > offense, but he would have to prove that, and proof is likely >

In article <l5mmv39ov1tspphjs0hfnh25f3tkk9lmla@4ax.com>, Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote: >Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote in >news:is1kv39uj7mq9rjqjaes7rnrr40fqgfms7@4ax.com: >> Many laws are written like that (such as parking tickets) where they

Deadrat wrote: > Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote in > news:is1kv39uj7mq9rjqjaes7rnrr40fqgfms7@4ax.com: > >> Deadrat wrote: >>> "John A. Weeks III" <john@johnweeks.com> wrote in >>> news:58pev3ls53n9hu254cc1noi9crg2chk0ot@4ax.com: >>>> If t

On Apr 8, 7:37 am, c <smalltalkingchic...@gmail.com> wrote: > In this specific article, it was a motorcycle without plates. Let's > say it was a green "speeder" motorcycle who was going so fast the > officer who tagged it couldn't chase it directly but

Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote: > gordonb.ub...@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) wrote: >> Legally, what's the difference between excessive speeding and >> speeding? 225mph in a 55mph vs. 75mph in a 55mph? > > I guess we get to be grammar b

On Apr 8, 7:37 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote: > Mike <prabb...@shamrocksgf.com> wrote innews:is1kv39uj7mq9rjqjaes7rnrr40fqgfms7@4ax.com: <snip> > > Many laws are written like that (such as parking tickets) where they > > ticket the car, not the drive