|
|
"Seth" <sethb@panix.com>
|
| >After the final design was approved the student emailed the completed
files
| >to the client with a bill for the balance ($100). The client used the
work
| >product but has refused to pay the balance and has resp
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
> NotMe <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>>After the final design was approved the student emailed the
>>completed files to the client with a bill for the balance ($100).
>>The client used the work product but has refused to
|
|
|
Stuart Bronstein wrote:
> Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>> Stuart Bronstein wrote:
>
>>> What does "the claim relates to that property" mean if not that
>>> the case has to be "about" the property?
>> Just a minor nit-pick but if I was on
|
|
|
Ernie Klein wrote:
> In article <bumb04tru4npp6nh9g8k3321hhof2k34do@4ax.com>,
> Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>
>> Stuart Bronstein wrote:
>>> Ernie Klein <ecklein@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>>> MailNotRead@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> To sue someo
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> On Apr 16, 6:58 am, Mike <prabb...@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>> Stuart Bronstein wrote:
>>> What does "the claim relates to that property" mean if not that the
>>> case has to be "about" the property?
>
> I agree with Stu on this
|
|
|
Stuart Bronstein wrote:
> Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>> Mike Jacobs wrote:
>
>>> Suits have been filed against "Almighty G-
>>> d" (although the courts usually later dismiss such suits because
>>> they decline to find that Heavenly serv
|
|
|
In article <91ge045kag7latdpbf1gsqsk8t0habeuf7@4ax.com>,
Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>> Just a minor nit-pick but if I was on your property and got bit by
>> your dog, I'd sue about the do
|
|
|
In article <aumb049u3f5jrqmuedg977svr0ga8qnbbb@4ax.com>,
Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>Generally speaking, you can sue someone if they live in or do business
>in the same jurisdiction as you, correct?
Generally speaking, you can sue an
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mike <prabb...@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>> Just a minor nit-pick but if I was on your property and got bit
>> by your dog, I'd sue about the dog bite but (I think) that law
>> would possibly allow me to sue y
|
|
|
In article <n0ge045p1dc3ud8mbimk0acq4rtsi89odp@4ax.com>,
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>If it is a participant in the conversation that is doing the
>recording, some states require the consent of only one party to a
>conversation, which
|
|
|
Aid,
...
> SUMMARY: Oil exploration company drills various failed wells in KY
> county, abandons them, convincing the property owners to take out
> bonds to cover liability for the wells (instead of paying to close
> them itself). These bonds
|
|
|
On Apr 17, 8:20 am, Don <dwz...@telus.net> wrote:
> On 2008-04-15 04:58:09 -0700, overlooked <SpicyWei...@gmail.com> said:
>
> > Bear with me, I'll try to be brief...here's a nutshell history of my
> > dilemma:
> > I filed for divorce in 2006 after e
|
|
|
I had a living will drawn up a few years ago by an attorney in Palm Springs,
CA. (I still live in nearby Cathedral City). In the First Amendment to the
(My Name) Revocable Living Trust under sub-heading B. Remainder of the
Estate as follows, I hav
|
|
|
"Seth" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
news:d0ge04l7f8gh4q94qsqpkc9mq0rbdo133b@4ax.com...
| In article <ptmb045blltchvktm9jevccoc28bgc5j17@4ax.com>,
| Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
| >jaedendak@gmail.com wrote:
| >
| >> I've s
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
> Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>>jaedendak@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> I've seen on some torrent trackers that offer a way to pay and
>>> call it a donation. In exchange for donating they give you
>>> d
|
|
|
gordonb.nwr0e@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) wrote:
> Probably what is being attempted is to split a two-way (taxable)
> sale into two separate one-way (non-taxable) "gifts". I doubt it
> succeeds if given any scrutiny.
Exactly right. In tax cas
|
|
|
On Apr 12, 7:32 am, henri <he...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> They could try. However, as most such controversies are based on state
> constitutions, it is very likely that such efforts would result in political
> pushback and amendment to the state consti
|
|
|
Forgive me if I'm posting this into the wrong forum, i'll gladly post
it elsewhere if there's a better choice.
Some years ago I purchased a hot-tub from one of the bigger local
contractors who built an anex to my existing deck and inserted the hot-
|
|
|
In article <10ge04lteegih3tfnma7a0nhe1ss417h2e@4ax.com>,
sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
> In order for an act to be attempted murder, there must be an actual
> person who the actor intended to murder, right?
>
> Example: Someone dresses a monkey i
|
|
|
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:19:46 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>A person who has died is no longer a person. So somebody shooting a
>corpse is similarly not committing attempted murder (unless there's a
>case of mistaken identity and he's trying
|
|
|
Seth wrote:
> In order for an act to be attempted murder, there must be an actual
> person who the actor intended to murder, right?
>
> Example: Someone dresses a monkey in an expensive suit, with expensive
> jewelry and carrying an expensive briefc
|
|
|
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:19:33 -0400 from Chipman <s_chipman@att.net>:
[auto accident, criminal charges, lawsuit, etc etc etc]
> Any advice?
Meaning no disrespect, you are out of your league on this one. Get
yourself and your wife a lawyer, NOW, and pu
|
|
|
On Apr 17, 8:19 am, Chipman <s_chip...@att.net> wrote:
> My wife recently received instructions from the state prosecution or at
> court to make arrangement for restitution on auto accident claim in
> return for dropping an evasion charge against her.
|
|
|
Is there some sort of course or book that teaches someone how to
be a (good) landlord? (Location: Dallas, Texas). A friend's husband
inherited a multi-unit apartment formerly occupied by several related
families, (and owned by one of them, so these w
|
|