|
|
ince the subject seems to have developed a life of its own, I'm
posting this case, which contains some in-depth discussion of the
power to regulate or define the practice of law, where it lies under
separation of powers doctrine, and the policy reason
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:46:14 -0400, Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Apr 18, 8:17 am, "NotMe" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> The plan, originally, was to send a standard demand notice then proceed to
>> small claims if the client did n
|
|
|
Bill,
Your parents are getting on in years and they want to deed you the
property, move to an apartment above the barn, and have you live in
the main house.
You ask about tax consequences.
I'm not sure why you posted here instead of to a more
|
|
|
wpflumus@yahoo.com wrote in news:uomj04h5djb9t402taf66pusdc6nmpk5cr@
4ax.com:
> My parents are getting up there in years and we just had a scare with
> Mom, we though she'd had a stroke but didn't, and my father would like
> me to move my family in
|
|
|
wpflumus@yahoo.com wrote:
> My parents are getting up there in years and we just had a scare
> with Mom, we though she'd had a stroke but didn't, and my father
> would like me to move my family in to help with future occurances
> or health issues.
|
|
|
On Apr 19, 4:45 am, Paul Cassel <pcasselremo...@comremovecast.net>
wrote:
> The phone company is a carrier. The OP refers to a hosting service. Huge
> difference.
Perhaps there is a difference, but it is not huge. The culpability of
a hosting se
|
|
|
n Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:45:21 -0400, Stuart Bronstein
<spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>David Briggman <briggman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> henri <he...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>> They could try. However, as most such controversies are based on
>>> state con
|
|
|
A young woman was bit by a dog that jumped over the
fence. The dog was not teased, The young woman went
to the hospital and the animal control people took
the dog because it did not have its current rabbies
shots. I understand the dog was at least
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:45:09 -0400 in misc.legal.moderated, A
Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote,
>Legal impossibility means that the completed act is not a crime, even
>though the defendant thinks it is -- he has the requisite mens rea,
>
|
|
|
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:13:40 -0400 from Gordon Burditt
<gordonb.ytbke@burditt.org>:
> Is there some sort of course or book that teaches someone how to
> be a (good) landlord? (Location: Dallas, Texas). A friend's husband
> inherited a multi-unit apart
|
|
|
On 2008-04-18 05:13:40 -0700, gordonb.ytbke@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) said:
> Is there some sort of course or book that teaches someone how to
> be a (good) landlord? (Location: Dallas, Texas). A friend's husband
> inherited a multi-unit apartme
|
|
