|
|
On February 7th, 2008, we had our car stolen from our driveway. The
first thing the 911 operator asked was if we were in default. We
said, "no." However, just to make sure there wasn't some mistake, we
called U.S. Bancorp in front of the sheriff and
|
|
|
On 2008-04-20 05:10:14 -0700, Deadrat <a@b.com> said:
> You're asking for advice on a newsgroup. Now you've got two problems.
>
> Here's the rule: no one competent to answer your question properly
> (i.e., a lawyer) will do so lest he inadventent
|
|
|
wpflu...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'd like to sell the house and
> clear up our current home loan then take the remainder of the cash and
> put it into my parents place. This would be a win win situation for
> all of us but if taxes will be very high I'm
|
|
|
I want to make a satirical news website, similar to the Onion. How
would I protect myself from slander if I start willy-nilly poking fun
of people in the news?
For those who don't know, theonion.com is a fake news organization.
It features satirical
|
|
|
On 2008-04-15 04:58:07 -0700, jaedendak@gmail.com said:
> I've seen on some torrent trackers that offer a way to pay and call it
> a donation. In exchange for donating they give you download ratio or
> bandwidth. I don't understand how this differs
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:09:37 -0400, rdadams@panix.com (Dick Adams)
wrote:
>A young woman was bit by a dog that jumped over the
>fence. The dog was not teased, The young woman went
>to the hospital and the animal control people took
>the dog becau
|
|
|
Dick Adams wrote:
[claims unprovoked dog attack]
> My interest here is purely legal and my opinion is
> that this is a slam dunk "owner is liable" case.
> Does anyone know the Marland law for this case?
>
Most dog ordinances are local, not st
|
|
|
David Harmon wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:45:09 -0400 in misc.legal.moderated, A
> Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote,
>> Legal impossibility means that the completed act is not a crime, even
>> though the defendant thinks it is -- he h
|
|
|
In article <8icm04tbjjf4mtd9e5rl9smub392v8btqn@4ax.com>,
David Harmon <source@netcom.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:45:09 -0400 in misc.legal.moderated, A
> Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote,
> >Legal impossibility means that the
|
|
|
David Harmon <source@netcom.com> wrote:
> Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote,
>>Legal impossibility means that the completed act is not a crime,
>>even though the defendant thinks it is -- he has the requisite
>>mens rea, but that is all
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:09:29 -0400, David Harmon <source@netcom.com>
wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:45:09 -0400 in misc.legal.moderated, A
>Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote,
>>Legal impossibility means that the completed act is not a c
|
|
