|
|
I know that charities don't have to honor the national do-not-call
list. But when I ask a charity specifically not to call me again, do
they have to honor that request?
If it matters, I'm in New York State, and the charity is one of those
police
|
|
|
On Apr 21, 7:14 am, Bill <ars_wa8...@netzero.com> wrote:
> On February 7th, 2008, we had our car stolen from our driveway. The
> first thing the 911 operator asked was if we were in default. We
> said, "no." However, just to make sure there wasn't
|
|
|
In article <into04lb7u7oi2jqrtgpdh8f2eupqu317a@4ax.com>,
Bill <ars_wa8mea@netzero.com> wrote:
> I was told that since I filed a business bankruptcy in 2005 (sole
> proprietorship so I had to list certain personal items for exemption),
> and the dep
|
|
|
Bill,
This is a bit confusing. You owned a car which may have been stolen. You
called the police and they have filled out the paperwork and done some
investigating. You have called your insurer who has filled out some
paperwork, done some inve
|
|
|
Don <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote in news:hnto04lpc652e32ugi6l15tbi4ln580urs@
4ax.com:
> On 2008-04-20 05:10:14 -0700, Deadrat <a@b.com> said:
>
>> You're asking for advice on a newsgroup. Now you've got two problems.
>>
>> Here's the rule: no one
|
|
|
On Apr 21, 11:14 am, oprah.cho...@gmail.com wrote:
> I want to make a satirical news website, similar to the Onion. How
> would I protect myself from slander if I start willy-nilly poking fun
> of people in the news?
>
You are protected from slande
|
|
|
On Apr 21, 7:14 am, oprah.cho...@gmail.com wrote:
> I want to make a satirical news website, similar to the Onion. How
> would I protect myself from slander if I start willy-nilly poking fun
> of people in the news?
>
>
Well, you probably will be
|
|
|
On Apr 21, 7:14 am, oprah.cho...@gmail.com wrote:
> I want to make a satirical news website, similar to the Onion. How
> would I protect myself from slander if I start willy-nilly poking fun
> of people in the news?
I suggest that you review the O
|
|
|
In article <jomj04dvf1jml1uanf2dkhu4of9vn2cmfa@4ax.com>,
Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote:
>Seth wrote:
>
>>> They probably don't have the right to 'sell' what you are downloading.
>>> What you are buying if I"m right, is enhanc
|
|
|
In article <d24h04thbbcalnsfp94l8vjlj8tdbdvsar@4ax.com>,
NotMe <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>"Seth" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
>news:d0ge04l7f8gh4q94qsqpkc9mq0rbdo133b@4ax.com...
>| What if it's a hobby (that, net, costs money)?
>
>A bank robb
|
|
|
Don <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote:
> The term "donation" has another connotation in the area where I
> live. It is used by prostitutes to refer to the money they recieve
> from clients. The idea is that, if money is not charged for sexual
> services, the
|
|
|
>The term "donation" has another connotation in the area where I live.
>It is used by prostitutes to refer to the money they recieve from
>clients. The idea is that, if money is not charged for sexual services,
>they are within the law and cannot be
|
|
|
On Apr 21, 11:14 am, Paul Cassel <pcasselremo...@comremovecast.net>
wrote:
> Dick Adams wrote:
>
> [claims unprovoked dog attack]
>
> > My interest here is purely legal and my opinion is
> > that this is a slam dunk "owner is liable" case.
> > Doe
|
|
|
On Apr 21, 7:14 am, Don <dwz...@telus.net> wrote:
> On 2008-04-15 04:58:07 -0700, jaeden...@gmail.com said:
>
> > I've seen on some torrent trackers that offer a way to pay and call it
> > a donation. In exchange for donating they give you download r
|
|
|
In article <424h04pa2aanoq7qtrc0jq0cmbrk4gvpko@4ax.com>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>The same is often true in the drug context. Suppose the police know
>someone wants to buy drugs, so they replace the drugs with fake stuff,
>then an undercover offi
|
|
|
In article <2nto04t2b99cumimnaskp98u5qtrokvlp6@4ax.com>,
henri <henri@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:09:29 -0400, David Harmon <source@netcom.com>
>wrote:
>>So how come it is supposed to be a crime to set up a meeting with a
>>forty y
|
|
|
In article <124h04theq7rtoi2ee5oe35j7uom12rpeu@4ax.com>,
Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>Attempted murder deals more with what the person tried (or attempted) to
>do and not what they actually succeeded in doing.
So: somebody tries to ki
|
|
|
On Apr 20, 8:09 am, David Harmon <sou...@netcom.com> wrote:
> >Legal impossibility means that the completed act is not a crime, even
> >though the defendant thinks it is -- he has the requisite mens rea,
> >but that is all. Illustration: An 18-year
|
|
|
Gordon,
I joined this group a couple of years ago because I needed some
landlording questions answered. I had purchased a duplex and my
father-in-law purchased the one next door, and it became my
responsibility to manage both properties. Since the
|
|
