|
|
On Apr 22, 5:56 am, Stan Brown <the_stan_br...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I know that charities don't have to honor the national do-not-call
> list. But when I ask a charity specifically not to call me again, do
> they have to honor that request?
>
> If
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:56:34 -0400, Stan Brown
<the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>I know that charities don't have to honor the national do-not-call
>list. But when I ask a charity specifically not to call me again, do
>they have to honor that
|
|
|
On Apr 22, 3:56 am, Stan Brown <the_stan_br...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I know that charities don't have to honor the national do-not-call
> list. But when I ask a charity specifically not to call me again, do
> they have to honor that request?
>
> If
|
|
|
On 2008-04-22 03:56:32 -0700, Deadrat <a@b.com> said:
> And your point? That people should post here with the expectation of
> obtaining free, valuable, and specific legal advice so the rest of us can
> be entertained?
No, people should not expec
|
|
|
Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote:
> Don <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote
>>
>> Good thinking. But the trouble is, if everybody took your advice
>> and nobody posting here asked for legal advice and no real
>> lawyers or anyone else gave any advice, reading the newsg
|
|
|
Hello, I'm looking for some kind of online library of legal documents
that I can use to reference when drafting things while working in a
corporate law firm. Our company has a database of previously written
documents but I'm looking for something a bit
|
|
|
On Apr 21, 7:14 am, oprah.cho...@gmail.com wrote:
> I want to make a satirical news website, similar to the Onion. How
> would I protect myself from slander if I start willy-nilly poking fun
> of people in the news?
>
In addition to other concerns,
|
|
|
Terms of use of this message: It may not be stored or read in North
Dakota. (see http://www.circleid.com/posts/811611_david_ritz_court_spam/
for the reason.)
In article <hnto04lpc652e32ugi6l15tbi4ln580urs@4ax.com>,
Don <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote:
|
|
|
Hello-
I have an employee here in CA who is not performing her tasks up to
the level of an Asst. Manager. As a reg employee, she is fine.
Anyway, I wanted to know if I can reduce her wages and position
legally back to where she is, or do I have to
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:56:28 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>In article <424h04pa2aanoq7qtrc0jq0cmbrk4gvpko@4ax.com>,
>Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>>The same is often true in the drug context. Suppose the police know
>>someone wants to buy dru
|
|
|
In article <j1hr04h9cr4v96it68frev1aksb8vl1ocn@4ax.com>,
sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
> In article <424h04pa2aanoq7qtrc0jq0cmbrk4gvpko@4ax.com>,
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>
> >The same is often true in the drug context. Suppose the police know
|
|
|
In article <h1hr04ds9bs6fmddtu3m7g2q5buimp6gaa@4ax.com>,
sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
> In article <124h04theq7rtoi2ee5oe35j7uom12rpeu@4ax.com>,
> Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>
> >Attempted murder deals more with what the person trie
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:56:28 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>In article <2nto04t2b99cumimnaskp98u5qtrokvlp6@4ax.com>,
>henri <henri@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:09:29 -0400, David Harmon <source@netcom.com>
>>wrote:
>>>So h
|
|
|
In article <svfe04tvionsvijfvbedb5blgejnbipdh6@4ax.com>,
Chipman <s_chipman@att.net> wrote:
> My view on this is that no restitution can
>begin without a reasonable request for paperwork be honored by the other
>party.
Why should anybody care
|
|
