|
|
> VIRGINIA v. MOORE (06-1082 Syllabus)
> http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1082.ZS.html
> ..
> Officers may perform searches incident to constitutionally
> permissible arrests in order to ensure their safety and
> safeguard evidence. ...
|
|
|
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:56:34 -0400 from Stan Brown
<the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm>:
> I know that charities don't have to honor the national do-not-call
> list. But when I ask a charity specifically not to call me again, do
> they have to honor that req
|
|
|
In article <3vs0149t03cnqkqireu328qv2dih0liiqg@4ax.com>,
Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote:
>Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in
>news:oh5u04t741faqp2hkuat1l0mj5b8h68ctu@4ax.com:
>>
>> Sometimes, even often, people do get good information and
|
|
|
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:51:07 -0400, Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote:
>Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in
>news:oh5u04t741faqp2hkuat1l0mj5b8h68ctu@4ax.com:
>> Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote:
>>> Don <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote
>>> And your point?
|
|
|
On Apr 24, 7:51 am, Stuart Bronstein <spamt...@lexregia.com> wrote:
> andk....@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hello, I'm looking for some kind of online library of legal documents
> > that I can use to reference when drafting things while working in a
> > corpo
|
|
|
On 24 Apr 2008, Mike Landorf <admin@forum.edina.mn.u_s> said/asked in
substance:
> [ Residential neighbors abutting and otherwise near
> a golf course are concerned that the club's planned
> expansion may not be "neighborhood friendly" -- e.g.,
>
|
|
|
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:50:56 -0400, Mike Landorf
<admin@forum.edina.mn.u_s> wrote:
>Is there space for a contract under these circumstances? The only=20
>incentive for the club to negotiate with the neighborhood is preserving=20
>its world-wide repu
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:56:31 -0400 in misc.legal.moderated,
sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote,
>Except the OP referred to a _directory_ service, which doesn't
>actually host anything itself. (Suppose Google charged extra for
>enhanced access to search res
|
|
|
On Apr 24, 7:50 am, Stuart Bronstein <spamt...@lexregia.com> wrote:
> bobwo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > I have an employee here in CA who is not performing her tasks up to
> > the level of an Asst. Manager. As a reg employee, she is fine.
> > Anyway, I w
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm being sued in superior court in California.
I was in an auto "accident" which resulted in some major damage to my
small car (totalled) but the other driver had deliberately applied the
brakes to cause a collision and his damage (to his pic
|
|
|
I was watching one of the crime shows on tv and it occurred to me: what do you
do if you are on your own, without any family, and you get arrested? What if
you have money in a bank account, but can't get to it?
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>>It depends on the facts. Suppose you see someone sitting on a
>>park bench. Little do you know, they died of a heart attack a few
>>minutes ago. You shoot the person. You're guilty of att
|
|
|
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:50:19 -0400, Stuart Bronstein
<spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>henri <henri@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> No, the concept of "attempt" is one which applies to most crimes.
>> It is generally a crime to attempt to commit a crime.
|
|
|
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:50:13 -0400 from Chipman <s_chipman@att.net>:
> It might be a strange concept for some but I am her
> counsel during this process.
Not strange, just foolhardy.
--
If you e-mail me from a fake address, your fingers will dro
|
|
|
Chipman <s_chipman@att.net> wrote:
> Seth wrote:
>> Chipman <s_chipman@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> My view on this is that no restitution can
>>> begin without a reasonable request for paperwork be honored by
>>> the other party.
>>
>> Why should a
|
|
|
On Apr 24, 7:50 am, Chipman <s_chip...@att.net> wrote:
> I care because I am her husband and care about her enough to get her the
> proper due process.
That would mean taking the steps to get her a lawyer, not trying to
play one yourself.
> It mi
|
|
|
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:50:13 -0400, Chipman <s_chipman@att.net> wrote:
>Seth wrote:
>> In article <svfe04tvionsvijfvbedb5blgejnbipdh6@4ax.com>,
>> Chipman <s_chipman@att.net> wrote:
>>> My view on this is that no restitution can
>>> begin witho
|
|
