misc.legal

Deborah Stevenson,,, <stevenso@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu> wrote in message news:<6pWSa.3285$o7.42238@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>... > "Steve Oster" <osterfurniturespambam@ameritech.net> writes: > > >For smaller (and inexpensive) items I have charged $2 for insuranc

In article <3F1CB158.63BD05F5@concentric.net>, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: > > Don't forget that *I* wasn't the one who brought this matter to >the NG. Well it sure wasn't anyone else who started discussing the case of Ken Smith, a

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 22:13:16 -0400, Moonbug <lalax@budweiser.com> wrote: >On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:03:29 -0600, Uncle Samuel <stars@bars> wrote: > >>On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:29:35 -0400, Moonbug <lalax@budweiser.com> >>wrote: >> >>> Learn a little >

amozpuu@yahoo.com (Amoz Puu) wrote in message news:<e38237ec.0307201657.4c3b21bc@posting.google.com>... > Those are good answers. I also need an actual estimate of what the > answer is. For example, > > Say we say if you use service and in my site an

Can you think of any *method* patent which seemed ridiculously simple - something just about anyone could do by just reading the patent - and yet have provided the inventor with a valuable patent that led to a marketable product or service? Regards,

On 21 Jul 2003 16:17:00 GMT, Alun Palmer <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote: >thunder9@nowhere.com (Thunder9) wrote in >news:3f1b7794.114206159@netnews.comcast.net: > >> On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 07:11:38 -0700, "McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> >> wrote: >> >>>"

"stores" <srstores@military.com> wrote in message news:<e_ASa.19549$7O.2971@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>... > Got to agree with penny.ian13. A #@&@^ing sailor is a happy sailor. During > deployment, when they stopped complaining was when I got worried. 8>} >

On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 03:37:27 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >Merlin wrote: > >> Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >> >Larry Smith wrote: >> >> >> You and Beaver keep wanting more facts. Read the guy's civil complaint,

> > Are you on crack? Maybe the sun in the land down under has fried your > > brain. The US military has some of the best equipment in the world, and > > it's soldiers are pretty good too. Whats the Aussies have? And you forget > > numbnuts your

"dC" <drcomet@netzero.net> wrote in message news:bfi84u$elk4p$1@ID-46710.news.uni-berlin.de... > Hello All: > > I'm just wondering if anything like this has happened to anyone that > participates in this newsgroup. > > Today when I got home from

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:03:29 -0600, Uncle Samuel <stars@bars> wrote: >On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:29:35 -0400, Moonbug <lalax@budweiser.com> >wrote: > >> Learn a little >>about reality before you go posting your dribble, idiot. > >Go huff another nic-

"Frank" <Frank@anywhere.com> wrote in message news:3f1b3dfa@news.infowest.com... > "ResLight" <reslight@reject.earthlink.net> wrote in message > news:C1ASa.111079$Io.9528280@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net... > > " ~ . * .¤. * .~" BewareOfScum@TheKli

Hello, Can someone please outline the process for obtaining a legal AKA? Also, can a legal AKA be added to a driver's license? For example, could a person obtain a document which would allow them to go to a DMV and obtain a driver's license t

Hello All: I'm just wondering if anything like this has happened to anyone that participates in this newsgroup. Today when I got home from work, I had a call that I returned and it was a bill collection agency called MCC Business Services in Flor

his is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------9DA0D41173779C236AC4761D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Merlin wrote: > solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote: > >Jon Beaver wrote > > >We ha

tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <F8LRa.5353$eP6.833231@news20.bellglobal.com>, >Name <ml878us@yahoo.com (nospam)> wrote: >> >>Furthermore, if you attempt to inerfere with my LEGAL enjoyment of tobbaco, >>I will consider it an assult and

Umm 1) how old were you, 2) did the will say all money goes to your mom? "Richard" <anom@anom> wrote in message news:bffogj03qm@enews4.newsguy.com... > > "geodav" <geodav@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > news:3F1B552B.5000505@bellsouth.net... > >

<jaybeatty@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:FAOSa.14497$Mc.1082275@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net... > > "glow" <glowinggibbon@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:bfftfb$qkb$1@austar-news.austar.net.au... > > > > <jaybeatty@earthlink.net> wr

"Chas Clements" <c.clements@comcast.net> writes: ><Deborah Stevenson>; <stevenso@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu> wrote >> "Chas Clements" <c.clements@comcast.net> writes: >> >I guess I should have put a little smiley face on it to flag you that it >was >> >sa

solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote: >Jon Beaver wrote >We have drawn up example after example of what isnt covered by 1AM --- speech, >or even speech plus conduct that violates a law for example-- but what about >the vast majority of speech and s

"Jeff Barnes" <JeffUNCFAN@webtv.net> wrote in message news:24383-3F1B80EB-270@storefull-2298.public.lawson.webtv.net... > What do you think about the upcoming Kobe Bryant case? This is the > comprehensive topic in which you can counsel Kobe Bryant as

In article <3F1C5CD3.D3C65A31@concentric.net>, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: > > Based on what? The only issue being raised is "mental fitness," and I >think you are mentally and morally unfit to practice law. I must be right, >right?

Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >Larry Smith wrote: >> You and Beaver keep wanting more facts. Read the guy's civil complaint, >> and if that's not enough have the high priests of the Colorado bar send you >> their grimy order denying h

solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote: >Merlin wrote: > >>"The Panel finds that the manner in which Applicant has chosen to pursue his >continuing crusade to expose Bob Larson reveals a significant lack of judgment >which resulted in a grave abuse of

"glow" <glowinggibbon@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:bfftfb$qkb$1@austar-news.austar.net.au... > > <jaybeatty@earthlink.net> wrote in message > news:aDGSa.14005$Mc.1030974@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net... > > > > > > What are you talking

"Chas Clements" <c.clements@comcast.net> writes: ><Deborah Stevenson>; <stevenso@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu> wrote >> In other words, you're aware that it's probably not legal, but you don't >> care? >No ma'am. >I think it's an utterly stupid question t

"Steve Oster" <osterfurniturespambam@ameritech.net> writes: >For smaller (and inexpensive) items I have charged $2 for insurance. So, I >was "self-insuring." If the person says they didn't get the item, I just >send them another. Is that wrong?

"Kris Baker" <kris.baker@prodigyy.net> wrote in message news:2nVSa.31$zo4.1243231@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com... > > "Chas Clements" <c.clements@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:_FadnaO20rPevYGiXTWJhA@comcast.com... > > > When you charge $3.00 t

Hi all, I've got this problem that I hope someone can help and/or give advice. Awhile back, I (as the programmer) partnered up with a graphic artist and created this application. The graphic artist and I made a verbal agreement that we'll split the

I would like some experienced input from the professional community regarding certification disclaimers for Land Surveys. What is your feedback or comments to improve upon. I appreciate any thoughts and suggestions. Below is a sample of what we

Nice try, voxxy. We all know how irrelevant the UN is anyway. You'll have to do better. "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:udSSa.11$Tm2.28125@news.uswest.net... > Ed wrote: > > "me" <calilife4me@cox.net> wrote in message > > n

"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:udSSa.11$Tm2.28125@news.uswest.net... > Ed wrote: > > "me" <calilife4me@cox.net> wrote in message > > news:fiNRa.830$Ye.487@fed1read02... > >> Wow! these are all great quotes...Where can I find

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:20:36 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >After all, if the Bar can retaliate against you for >your content (*necessarily* commingled with conduct) -- under >the pretense of being concerned about whatever they can

"Chas Clements" <c.clements@comcast.net> writes: ><Deborah Stevenson>; <stevenso@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu> wrote >......> >Nope; you're providing a special service for someone who needs >insurance, >> >packaging, postage, attendant costs and someone to r

"Chas Clements" <c.clements@comcast.net> writes: >"Doc" <docsavage20@yahoo.com> wrote >> When you charge $3.00 to offer the insurance that Post Office sells >> for $1.30, you are reselling insurance. >Nope; you're providing a special service for s

"Chas Clements" <c.clements@comcast.net> wrote in message news:_FadnaO20rPevYGiXTWJhA@comcast.com... > "Doc" <docsavage20@yahoo.com> wrote > > When you charge $3.00 to offer the insurance that Post Office sells > > for $1.30, you are reselling insur

Has anyone noticed that the rape shield law is useless for Kobe's victim because the Internet makes it impossible to maintain any form of privacy? Her pictures have been posted to the Internet, address, school grades and tons of other information. Most

"!" <nospam@nospam.com> said: > >"- Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote > >> Now this IS funny ... shut up and die for the Bu$h Mob's lies you stupid >> grunts, and no >> whining about it either >> >> >> Posted on Fri, Jul. 18, 2003 >> >> Grumb

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:25:23 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: > Don't expect Merlin, Jon, or any of these jakes to address your >questions, Chase. Because it's not a "question." It's a contention, and a complaint, that "lawyers"

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:23:23 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >Larry Smith wrote: > >> "David Marc Nieporent" <nieporen@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote in message >> news:nieporen-1F0B38.14091020072003@news.fu-berlin.de... >> > In artic

<Deborah Stevenson>; <stevenso@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu> wrote > >No ma'am. > >I think it is absolutely legal and any regulatory authority would laugh at > >you and tell the story for a year about what assholes people can be, and > >think the USPS is. > '

"Uncle Samuel" <stars@bars> wrote > Ah we have to try everything in the media first these days, > pathetic... Yeah; better we cover it up and keep it quietnot. The court of public opinion has no mechanism to enforce it's judgments- Kobe could be as

"Uncle Samuel" <stars@bars> wrote > That's an awful quick pre-trial conviction pal, Nah; a conviction would mean I could punish him. It's just an opinion. The opinion, however, is based on watching such events ever since a friend of mine's daughter

<jaybeatty@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:aDGSa.14005$Mc.1030974@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net... > > > > What are you talking about? I'm extreamly proud to be a member of the > > > greatest military on earth, we've got a good record so

In article <bfah1r$31a$1@austar-news.austar.net.au>, glow <glowinggibbon@hotmail.com> wrote: > >Where a non-smoking jail. Like to see what happens if they refuse an inmate >their cigarettes custodians arn't allowed to refuse them. It is an >infringem

In news message <3f1b4e79$1@cicada> Stephen Andrewartha <steve@cts.canberra.edu.au> wrote:- >I've openly confessed my atheist leanings to some JWs, Gen 1:3 (Authorized PB Version) div(B)=0 div(D)=Pf curl(E)=-dB/dt curl(H)=jf+dD/dt >a

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:22:09 -0600, "Jeremy Harmon" <jeremy.mylastnamehere@attbi.com> wrote: > >"Uncle Samuel" <stars@bars> wrote in message >news:nveohv0eudkogv1q8jt4d82k4m7ir8gm64@4ax.com... >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:33:09 -0600, "Jeremy Harmon"

"Uncle Samuel" <stars@bars> wrote in message news:nveohv0eudkogv1q8jt4d82k4m7ir8gm64@4ax.com... > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:33:09 -0600, "Jeremy Harmon" > <jeremy.mylastnamehere@attbi.com> wrote: > > > > >"John Starrett" <jstarret@carbon.cudenver.edu

steve@cts.canberra.edu.au (Stephen Andrewartha) wrote in news:fa493e73.0307210113.7feee873@posting.google.com: > Rich Andrews <n0-spam@yah0o.com> wrote in message > news:<Xns93BFACC1412Fmc2500183316chgoill@216.168.3.44>... > >> I have more fun w