misc.legal

In article <nlITa.2930$ys2.175865@news20.bellglobal.com>, Name <ml878us@yahoo.com (nospam)> wrote: >refusal to enter for a start, with forcefull resistance if need be. > >Mike Up to and including stamping your feet, crying copiously, and holding

Dee wrote: > Vox Pop wrote............. > >> Hence the need for laws, and punishment, for >> lowlife addicted scumbags like yourself who >> refuse to control your offensive and >> obnoxious behavior when in public > > Yawn, we smokers have heard t

Name wrote: > No, I have a problem with stinking piece of #@($ politically-correct > social engineers who think they are going to dictate to ME how I > enjoy MY legal rights-- I have a right to piss, therfore I have a right to piss on your face, eh

No, I have a problem with stinking piece of #@($ politically-correct social engineers who think they are going to dictate to ME how I enjoy MY legal rights--I'd happily do the same to any animal-rights jackass, enviro-freak, pro-life @$#*hole, "attitud

> Prosecutor: More Than 1,000 Victims in Boston Church Scandal > > Wednesday, July 23, 2003 > > AP > > BOSTON - Clergy members and others in the Boston Archdiocese (search) > probably sexually abused more than 1,000 people over a period of six > d

Prosecutor: More Than 1,000 Victims in Boston Church Scandal Wednesday, July 23, 2003 AP BOSTON - Clergy members and others in the Boston Archdiocese (search) probably sexually abused more than 1,000 people over a period of six decades, Massach

refusal to enter for a start, with forcefull resistance if need be. Mike "Merlin" <mag@camelot.org> wrote in message news:3f1c5389.16665113@news.sf.sbcglobal.net... > tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > > >In article <F8LRa.5353$eP6.833231@news20.b

<ru.igarashi@usask.ca> wrote in message news:bfkhaa$739$1@tribune.usask.ca... > jabriol <jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote: > > ><ru.igarashi@usask.ca> wrote in message > >news:bfk0ji$33g$1@tribune.usask.ca... > >> > >> No, the postings I read that YOU m

U.S. to show photos of dead sons WASHINGTON (CNN) --The United States says it will release photographs of the bodies of Uday and Qusay Hussein, who were killed by U.S. forces in Iraq. The decision was announced Wednesday in Washington by U.S. Defen

This Askew guy took a chapter from the GW Bu$h Doctrine of Pre-emtive strikes. If you can't negotiate with them, assassinate them ! The chickens have come home to roost! NYC councilman killed by political rival 'The system killed my brother' N

In article <vhu1ind7ngn759@corp.supernews.com> "Larry Smith" <dbrigman3@charter.net> writes: >> RIAA v. Diamond Multimedia >> 51 USPQ2d 1115, 180 F3d 1072 >> Ninth Circuit, 1999 > >Well, that's an interesting case but the question is does a 9th Circu

In article <bfncaf$um1$1@blue.rahul.net>, c.c.eiftj@WellXXDOES.usenet.us.com (Rahul Dhesi) wrote: >none@nowhere.com (Larry) writes: > >>But if a lawyer files 10 suits on behalf of a >>client and loses them all, without knowing anything more than th

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 04:09:50 +0000 (UTC), c.c.eiftj@WellXXDOES.usenet.us.com (Rahul Dhesi) wrote: >Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> writes: > >[ about California's vexations litigant statute ] > >>It discriminates against people who >>act without comp

In article <3F1DFDCE.41D6A5E5@concentric.net>, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >Larry Smith wrote: >> "Larry" <anobody@nowhere.com > > Am I right that this is the "logic" of your argument? If so, then your >> [snip cute stuff] >> > re

"Patrick Henry" <pat_henry_google@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:919ec0ef.0307231354.1fbab22b@posting.google.com... > My former neighbor is counter-sueing me in small claims. Last night, > the legal notice was left in my neighbor's mailbox. Should

Just burn some magnetic powder on your hard drive head. Your drive will all says "Plonk !". Italy Anonymous Remailer wrote: > Folks, Evidence Eliminator frequently spams these groups > claiming that their VB bloatware "cleanses" your harddrive. >

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:10:07 GMT, hgoldste@mpcs.com <hgoldste@mpcs.com> wrote: : Has anyone here used or heard of others who've used and landed : an associate position with the resume+cover letter mass mailing : strategy a la findlawjob.com and l

In article <bfme9h013c0@enews2.newsguy.com>, "Richard" <anom@anom> wrote: > >Send a bill to the attorney for $5,000. When he refuses to pay, file in >small claims court. Why should he send a "bill" Richard? This is dumb advice. The lawyer can, an

In article <vhths17e5ujg66@corp.supernews.com>, "Larry Smith" <dbrigman3@charter.net> wrote: > >You read about as well as you spell and fiddle around with the English >language. Ken Smith graduated from a Colorado law school with honors. He >is e

In article <bfmh0g$lq5$1@blue.rahul.net>, c.c.eiftj@WellXXDOES.usenet.us.com (Rahul Dhesi) wrote: >mag@camelot.org (Merlin) writes: > >>>Well, I did, Beaver, and I suspect it's a lawyer-lobbied effort to >>>effectively chill pro se litigation. >

In article <aDCdnSEoqucXcIOiXTWJkQ@comcast.com>, Chas Clements <c.clements@comcast.net> wrote: >"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote >......> > If Kaitlynn had a gun, there wouldn't be any question about >whether the sex >> > was consensual or not.

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:21:57 GMT, mag@camelot.org (Merlin) wrote: >Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 02:49:55 GMT, mag@camelot.org (Merlin) wrote: >> >>>Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >>>>Merlin wrote: >>>> >

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:12:07 GMT, mag@camelot.org (Merlin) wrote: >Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: > >>On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:27:55 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> >>wrote: >> >>> >>> Speaking of experienced lawyers, Larry Smith seem

"Tom" <tom601866@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:997acc0a.0307230950.62858c36@posting.google.com... > I understand what you mean about the Mot P7389 being outdated and not > much incentive. I also have a V60i (with J2ME) GSM phone with extra > batt

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:48:29 -0400, "Larry Smith" <dbrigman3@charter.net> wrote: > >"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message >news:dnathv8auutttsdtbs3qhenoeom2j5k6io@4ax.com... >> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:02:59 -0400, "Larry Smith" >> <dbrigma

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:45:49 GMT, mag@camelot.org (Merlin) wrote: >c.c.eiftj@WellXXDOES.usenet.us.com (Rahul Dhesi) wrote: > >>mag@camelot.org (Merlin) writes: >> >>>>Well, I did, Beaver, and I suspect it's a lawyer-lobbied effort to >>>>effective

Since you received actual notice, yes. -- Brett ***************************************************************** * Personal Injury/Malpractice Bankruptcy * * *

"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote ........> > No, I said that if there were no rounds expended the sex was > > consensual. Expended rounds would mean the sex was non-consensual. > And that pathetic, illogical and erroneous supposition was clearly

In article <LfATa.395240$Ho4.2748744@news.easynews.com> "BoatMan" <BoatMan0609@aol.com> writes: > >"Lee Hollaar" <hollaar@faith.cs.utah.edu> wrote in message >news:bfjqaq$dd$1@coward.ks.cc.utah.edu... >> In article <4e6ea60c.0307220744.65f65ac6@postin

"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote > I'd be very surprised if that "logic" didn't get you removed from a > jury for cause. Ohhhhhh Noooooooooo c.

"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:4e6ea60c.0307231010.748d804c@posting.google.com... > "Chas Clements" <c.clements@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<0kCdnQLbVNNcBoOiXTWJhg@comcast.com>... > > > They let OJ go, bu

Does that include the Bu$h's Alcoholic, Criminal Daughters? BTR1701 wrote: > In article <4e6ea60c.0307231007.5ce6a209@posting.google.com>, > ronnirubin@sprintmail.com (Arthur L. Rubin) wrote: > >> "Chas Clements" <c.clements@comcast.net> wrote in m

"BTR1701" <BTR1702@austin.rr.com> wrote > I'm saying that the one jury it was presented to acquitted him. Anything > else is speculation and proves nothing. Well, no; that isn't true. The acquittal only relieves him of the onus of the government's s

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:32:45 -0400, "Carol Ann" <lowcarber@mindspring.com> blurted: >:::: American Idol Katelynn >:: >:: Anyone know where to find a picture of her online? > >Found a few, thanks, anyway! > >Carol Ann tay -- "If I end up

Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >Jon Beaver wrote: >> On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:31:14 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> >> wrote: >> >Jon Beaver wrote: >> >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:20:36 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> > >

Keith wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:12:50 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> > wrote: > >> They must be the "evil doers" that lowlife GW Bu$h speaks of ... >> 18-6-501. Adultery. >> Statute text >> Any sexual intercourse by a married person o

Chas Clements wrote: > "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote >> You a @$#*ing idiot Chas. > > If I @$#*ed one, it'd be you, Vox. > >> You claimed that if there were expended rounds >> there "wouldn't be *any* question" about whether the >> sex was

"Lee Hollaar" <hollaar@faith.cs.utah.edu> wrote in message news:bfkr04$bl7$1@coward.ks.cc.utah.edu... > In article <4e6ea60c.0307221559.65a7639e@posting.google.com> ronnirubin@sprintmail.com (Arthur L. Rubin) writes: > >Specific, but I don't see

"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote > You a @$#*ing idiot Chas. If I @$#*ed one, it'd be you, Vox. > You claimed that if there were expended rounds > there "wouldn't be *any* question" about whether the > sex was consensual. No, I said that

"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:<V6BTa.135$hP.42007@news.uswest.net>... > 18-8-111. False reporting to authorities. > Statute text > (1) A person commits false reporting to authorities, if: > > (a) He knowingly causes a false

"Lee Hollaar" <hollaar@faith.cs.utah.edu> wrote in message news:bfjqaq$dd$1@coward.ks.cc.utah.edu... > In article <4e6ea60c.0307220744.65f65ac6@posting.google.com> ronnirubin@sprintmail.com (Arthur L. Rubin) writes: > >Actually -- not necessarily.

"Chas Clements" <c.clements@comcast.net> writes: >I say that I will ship anywhere in the world; and I will. >I guarantee that the goods are as represented. >I do not guarantee the delivery of the package. Right, but if you don't explicitly waive y

"thisisme" <thisisme@cotse.net> wrote in message news:dGhpc2lzbWU=.373845bcd1a980d869dd3ca2c85419a8@1058991353.cotse.net... > Larry wrote: > > > In article > > <dGhpc2lzbWU=.47489df9ac43753a52946e2ea24fa6be@1058907248.cotse.net>, > > thisisme <thi

"Chas Clements" <c.clements@comcast.net> writes: ><Deborah Stevenson>; <stevenso@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu> wrote >(I don't know what you actually >> sell, Chas, so it's possible you're working in a market where your >> approach is more common, but it's r

mag@camelot.org (Merlin) writes: >>Well, I did, Beaver, and I suspect it's a lawyer-lobbied effort to >>effectively chill pro se litigation. > Then you are a