misc.legal

I agree with the editorials conclusion that judges should be allowed to judge with this premise: Judges should be clearly qualified through education and experience for their positions with a demonstrable dedication to the "rule of law" and with a "ju

"Andre Lieven" <dg411@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message news:bhevt9$aks$1@freenet9.carleton.ca... > > > > My point about 'statistics' was that arguing back and forth about the > > numbers doesn't do anything to change any of the situations. You

In article <3F3A2CD7.7C9DB26C@concentric.net>, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: > > And as for "decorum," has it become a crime to speak the truth, even in >graphic terms, in an American courtroom? "You're too damn honest to be >a lawyer,

In article <rkoljv09p4d77622edm08vefphc39776c4@4ax.com>, Robert H. Risch <rhrisch@optonline.net> wrote: >On 14 Aug 2003 01:06:49 +0200, ft9kds95@cheshire.hopto.org >(anon@cheshire.dyndns.dk) wrote: > >>By setting up a "blacklist" of judges who aren

Frasik the Squash Bug <frasik@zucchini.vine.nospam> wrote in news:9sEYa.1558$Mp3.1105@nwrddc01.gnilink.net: > Can I do anything about daily flights of helicopters over my house? > The damned assholes fly not 100 ft above my house. I don't know if

On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 03:19:06 GMT, "Kingfish" <spam_trap_void@yahoo.com> wrote: > >"Richard" <anom@anom> wrote in message news:bhesv40qg7@enews3.newsguy.com... >: Kingfish wrote:>> >: >: >: > "Jiggs McManus" <anon@cheshire.dyndns.dk> wrote in mes

On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 02:07:03 GMT, "Kingfish" <spam_trap_void@yahoo.com> wrote: > >"Jiggs McManus" <anon@cheshire.dyndns.dk> wrote in message >news:JMF3G6C737846.8662962963@anonymous.poster... >: (They attempt to desTroy freedom, the ACLU patches th

On 14 Aug 2003 00:47:28 -0000, Jiggs McManus <anon@cheshire.dyndns.dk> wrote: >(They attempt to desTroy freedom, the ACLU patches things up.) > >DENVER -- The American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit >Tuesday seeking to throw out a n

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:38:21 +0100 in talk.rape James Cameron <buggrit@btinternet.com> wrote in message <bhdbh1$109bif$1@ID-13547.news.uni-berlin.de>... > Men in Scotland have been convicted of domestic violence for "giving > an angry look" and "pre

On 12 Aug 2003 23:31:25 -0700 in talk.rape Waldo Weaver <waldoweaver@hotmail.com> wrote in message <5aede0f4.0308122231.20963341@posting.google.com>... > After Kobe "gets off", despite Colorado's supposedly tough rape laws, > there will undoubtedly

"formica63" (pitter@patter.com) writes: > "Andre Lieven" <dg411@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message > news:bhdd1g$15v$1@freenet9.carleton.ca... >> "stargazer" (stargazer@hotmail.com) writes: >> > "Waldo Weaver" <waldoweaver@hotmail.com> wrote in mes

----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Has he sued Stebe yet? If not, why? ==================================================== From theleg@newsguy.com Fri Mar 07 14:03:54 2003 Path: newssvr13.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm01!newsdbm01.news.prodigy.com!news

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 03:53:09 GMT, yeah@fvckit.com (joe) wrote: >Philadelphia Inquirer >Jul. 05, 2002 > >A 'marriage strike' emerges as men decide not to risk loss Looks like the Leykis 101 lessons are being taken to heart... --- I need a

Richard wrote: > Are we missing something here? You're missing a lot, dickhead, but let's not get into that here. > Seems to me like an entire state government has forgotten that such a > mandate across the board is already unconstitutioal. A c

On 13 Aug 2003 04:28:48 GMT, xxxxxxx@hotmail.com (XXX) wrote: ->waldoweaver@hotmail.com (Waldo Weaver) wrote: ->> ScorpionKing@attNOSPAM.net wrote in message ->> news:<fo7ijv4eidbk4un62kf8f8cbrnvjgsf253@4ax.com>... ->> ->> > Baily, quoting statisti

[rm alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers,rec.sport.football.college] On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:58:12 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: ->Hownow wrote: ->> Is the federal Mann Act still on the books? ->> I believe adulteryfell under its scope,

Kingfish wrote:>> > "Jiggs McManus" <anon@cheshire.dyndns.dk> wrote in message > news:JMF3G6C737846.8662962963@anonymous.poster... > : (They attempt to desTroy freedom, the ACLU patches things up.) > : > : DENVER -- The American Civil Libert

Hey there, I have a question. I work part-time for State University (made up name, of course). Recently SU announced a full-time position in its job bulletin that I qualified for. One of the requirements stated on the bulletin is that applicants

jitney wrote: > Probably unenforceable, given the privacy standards enunciated on > SCOTUS' recent sodomy case.-Jitney LOL. Unenforceable for rump riders. Enforced every day to send straight white men off to Auchwitz. It's clear who are the favo

Bensisco wrote: > "Wolfie" <bgbdwolf@gte.net> wrote in message news:<jQv_a.38944$K4.1874644@twister.tampabay.rr.com>... > >>"sinistersteve" wrote >> >> >>>Perhaps this would only apply to those that are married with a Colorado >>>marriage license.

jitney wrote: > It may get so that along with a condom, a man brings a consent form > for her to sign. Singles bars and fitness clubs may have to keep a > notary on staff. Of course, now that not even a marriage certificate > is a consent form, that m

Thanks everyone for assisting in answering this question for me. I heard back from my daughter today and she said that she had to go to court today and that the judge said it's rescinded when he saw the domestic violence and child abduction reports of

In article <3F3A2D33.D7D1B03F@concentric.net>, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: > > If the government says you have to give up your constitutional right as >a condition precedent to getting something which is yours as a matter of >statutor

In article <3F3A2CF9.119308F6@concentric.net>, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >Larry wrote: > >> In article <3F38DEB0.E032383C@concentric.net>, Ken Smith >> <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >> > >> >If they don't, simply follow the cr

In article <buhkjvgk87our7lk783u6cfliqdeqktkdm@4ax.com>, Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: > >Yeah, yeah, I know, we're all a bunch of nobody low-lifes. You can >throw all of that in too. But give us the truth while you're at it. > Actually, Jon

> Perhaps a mixed jury is the only fair answer. I've never been there but I am hearing that this will be very unlikely since it is predominately white.

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 21:27:28 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: >jitney wrote: >> Probably unenforceable, given the privacy standards enunciated on >> SCOTUS' recent sodomy case.-Jitney > >LOL. Unenforceable for rump riders. Enforced every

In article <bhdunm$1f4$2@jik.kamens.brookline.ma.us> in misc.consumers, Jonathan Kamens <jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us> wrote: >If all else fails and you are certain you can make a >convincing case that the hospital was at fault for not sending >the tes

> Then maybe he should have gone to Compton to @$#* around; have they no spa? > If the probabilities are that he cannot get a 'fair' trial, he has only > himself to blame. He knew if he was breaking a taboo; he knew where he was > and who he was doing

s_knight8 wrote: > http://www.drrichardhall.com/allegations.htm > False allegations of abuse occur in a variety of contexts; the most frequent > being 1) disputed and ugly divorce cases; 2) in custody disputes involving > children; 3) by angry bor

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:21:47 -0700, Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: ->Waldo Weaver wrote: ->> After Kobe "gets off", despite Colorado's supposedly tough rape laws, ->> there will undoubtedly be shrill calls to toughen them up some more. -

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:07:13 -0400, "Ted Kerin" <tf.kerin@gte.net> wrote: > ><ScorpionKing@attNOSPAM.net> wrote in message >news:6v3ijv4id789qrj6h0t5g9kumhcmc72qff@4ax.com... >> >> To represent the fact that real rapes occur every day. >> -- >

She needs to contact an attorney, immediately. Don't cross-post for legal advice on an options-trading newsgroup. arb. "Peter C Tam" <PeterCTam@HotMail.COM> wrote in message news:8fce5e80.0308131159.afacae2@posting.google.com... > One of my fr

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003,"steve" <yournamehere@deathtospammers.com> wrote: > Greetings, that's what some subpoenas say, too. > What is required to obtain a "subpoena duces > tecum"? Does there have to be an active trial > or just an investigation?

sounds like alot of people I know. Men and women.

at http://member.newsguy.com/~gunhed/pat/mikey_Cranston.html Do you really want to associate with this guy? -- Steve º¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤º Steve Chaney gunhed57@vegetus.pacbell.net Remove "Vegetus." to get my real email address See the s

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, "Trooper Truth" <h_reed@earthlink.net> wrote: >To clarify this situation, an ex-husband was > granted a restraining order against his former > wife, the mother who has primary of their > two children. They each have a history o

http://insidedenver.com/drmn/business/article/0,1299,DRMN_4_2175339,00.html I find it ironic that Ticket Bastard claims SCI is being greedy when in fact, part of the reason they claim they won't release tickets to them is because they don't charge fe

> Either that or he'll go to prison for a few years. I think that Kobe's chances of being found guilty are higher due to the available jury pool. I honestly believe that all people are prejudice to different degrees and this will have an effect on t

"Daran" <daranSPAMg@lineone.net> wrote in message news:tbaehb.1b2.ln@wheresmeshirt.clara.net... > On 12 Aug 2003 23:31:25 -0700 in talk.rape Waldo Weaver > <waldoweaver@hotmail.com> wrote in message > <5aede0f4.0308122231.20963341@posting.google.com

"sinistersteve" wrote > Perhaps this would only apply to those that are married with a Colorado > marriage license. Doubtful. They recognize out-of-state marriages for everything else. It's just an old law that's not enforced. Plenty of those

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, James Cameron <buggrit@btinternet.com> wrote: >On 12 Aug 2003 23:31:25 -0700, waldoweaver@hotmail.com (Waldo Weaver) >wrote: >>Yes, you read that right , gentlemen. To prosecute a man for rape, you >>will need only prove that a

Perhaps this would only apply to those that are married with a Colorado marriage license. "s_knight8" <s_knight8@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:6bd12cd6.0308130823.239532f3@posting.google.com... > http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/sports/6519027.ht

"stargazer" <stargazer@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:aoy_a.10959$xQ1.4491@fe05.atl2.webusenet.com... > > > > There's a huge difference between 'questioning' the accuser and trashing her > completely, posting her name, address, phone number,

Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >"Theodore A. Kaldis" wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >But Larry Smith (by reputation a retired attorney who, based on his posts, has no "reputation" worth commending him here, and has neither posted h

In article <bhdsim$fq7$1@bob.news.rcn.net>, jim.bello@eracent.com wrote: > > What are my options here? Am I still liable for the fee even though the > hospital made the error? What is their culpability in this situation? Your best option is proba

"Rich, PLS" wrote: > Dewee, Cheetem, & Howe Dewey, Cheatham. Boyd, Dewey, Cheatham Dewey Cheatham & Howe Boyd, Dewey, Cheatham & Howe -- Paul Robinson "Above all else... We shall go on..." "...And continue!" "If the lessons of history teac

> What is it about sex, a totally normal and natural part of human life, that > people find so offensive? In my opinion there should be no laws governing > sex, but besides that kids DO need to learn about sex. That's an easy one to answer, everybo

Have you spoken to an ombudsman or patient advocate at the hospital? Have you spoken to an ombudsman, patient advocate or problem resolution officer at Aetna? Those would be good places to start. If all else fails and you are certain you can make