|
Bayer AG v. Housey Pharm., Inc. The CAFC affirmed the dismissal of Housey's infringement claims because it concluded that infringement under section 271(g) of 35 U.S.C. is limited to physical goods that were manufactured and does not include information generated by a patented process, and because the physical goods here (drug products) were not manufactured by a process claimed in the asserted patents. For more patent information, see http://www.patentcribsheet.com/Cases/housey.html. -------------------------------- This posting contains educational information for lawyers directly impacting patent preparation and prosecution. It does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create or constitute any attorney-client relationship.
|
| |
| |
|