|
|
In article <ZT2bb.2804$Rd4.2127@fed1read07>, VicXnews <Vic@Xnews.com>
wrote:
>
> That article was written by a true Laker hater with no brains...A real
> Bozo
I've been completely unimpressed by the musings of sports writers on
this and othe
|
|
|
"Tim Tyler" <tim@tt1.org> wrote:
> ``Eolas suit may spark HTML changes''
You didn't quote the best part!
Eolas, the company that defeated Microsoft and its "herd of starved
snarling weasels" highly paid legal defense team, is _how_ big?
"Eola
|
|
|
In article <5c3bb.4413$jO.3259@bignews3.bellsouth.net>, "stargazer"
<stargazer@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Says
> something about the caliber of kobe at all costs supporters.
I have to say, I don't really like that the referred piece assumes
Bryant
|
|
|
"Chris Smith" <chriso1976@earthlink.net> wrote
> That and her behavior up until the point where she sought the police
should
> be questioned. She wasn't said to have been acting hysterically after she
> was supposedly raped. Arguments can be made bo
|
|
|
"Hoofington J. McSnort" <abuse@my.butt> wrote in news:VK-dnTbl5sk2RvGiRVn-
hA@giganews.com:
> abuse@verizon.net
>
>
>
i am not entitled to freedom of speech because my lawyer says it is
unconstitutional
my ACLU lawyer says that i cannot
|
|
|
"ILoveQAF" <NoSpamAccepted@sorry.fake.com> wrote in
news:qi4bb.376$gR1.245@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net:
> The state in question, Texas, is an "employment at will" state; there
> is a law making it illegal to terminate an employee DUE TO an
> o
|
|
|
LuXx wrote:
> I'm moving soon and have no way of hauling my furniture, which I won't
> be needing...
> If I left it behind for the landlord to deal with (it's in good
> shape), will he just withhold my deposit or can he come after me with
> a fi
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us@thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote in message
news:J18bb.586$gR1.341@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "stargazer" <stargazer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:lN7bb.8548$8j.3554@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
> >
> >
|
|
|
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:58:59 GMT, Gary S. Simon <garscosi@pipeline.com> wrote:
> In article <mF%ab.4305$lA4.180@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>,
> "Fred" <freeloosedirt@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Question for lawyers: doesn't the requirement to post bail, i
|
|
|
Pay a professional to help you become a professional. Freeloaders
usually remain amateurs.
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
In article <Xns93FCA49E74567jacquesbouchardyahoo@206.130.183.196>,
"Jacques E. Bouchard" <jacques_e_bouc
|
|
|
The state in question, Texas, is an "employment at will" state; there is a
law making it illegal to terminate an employee DUE TO an on-the-job injury.
But...can you extrapolate from that that it's illegal to terminate the
employee if they're unable to
|
|
|
"Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us@thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote in message
news:Yr7bb.603$vS.49@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "stargazer" <stargazer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Ro6bb.8481$8j.4804@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
> >
> > "R
|
|
|
stargazer wrote:
> "Robert Lee" <cranchingwire@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:cranchingwire-511B13.12155220092003@news.west.earthlink.net...
> > In article <6bd12cd6.0309200816.964e022@posting.google.com>,
> > s_knight8@ho
|
|
|
What really bothers me about this yet untried and unproven criminal case,
is the same thing that bothered me during the O.J. Simpson case.
Not that they both involved Celebrity Sports figures, or their race, or their
wealth, or that they both were al
|
|
|
|
|
|
i became a criminal because the law and lawyers protect criminals and not
the victims
|
|
|
i am a criminal because i want to be a criminal lawyer
|
|
|
"Robert Lee" <cranchingwire@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:cranchingwire-BCDE55.16463220092003@news.west.earthlink.net...
> In article <5c3bb.4413$jO.3259@bignews3.bellsouth.net>, "stargazer"
> <stargazer@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
|
|
|
Robert Lee <cranchingwire@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote in
news:cranchingwire-511B13.12155220092003@news.west.earthlink.net:
> In article <6bd12cd6.0309200816.964e022@posting.google.com>,
> s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) wrote:
>
>> An
|
|
|
my ACLU lawyer says i can join NAMBLA and rape your children because i have
a right to express myself
|
|
|
i chose to smoke myself into an early grave but my lawyer says it is not my
fault
|
|
|
it is my right to sodomize another man as long as i do not display the ten
commandments in public
|
|
|
i can kill your children because my lawyer says i wasn't hugged enough when
i was young
|
|
|
i chose to eat myself into an early grave but my lawyer says it is
mcdonald's fault
|
|
|
i spilled coffee on my lap but my lawyer says it is not my fault
|
|
|
i will steal what i want and my lawyer will come up with a good excuse to
justify what i do
|
|
|
"Don Wheeler" <cwheeler@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3F6CD005.3BE9C060@optonline.net...
>
>
> stargazer wrote:
>
> > "Robert Lee" <cranchingwire@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote in
message
> > news:cranchingwire-511B13.12155220092003@
|
|
|
i am not guilty of molesting your children because my lawyer says i am
innocent
|
|
|
i am not a criminal because i only commit crimes
|
|
|
i can drink and drive because my lawyer is going to help me kill your
children
|
|
|
In article <mF%ab.4305$lA4.180@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>,
"Fred" <freeloosedirt@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Question for lawyers: doesn't the requirement to post bail, in any amount,
> go against the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" ?
O
|
|
|
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:02:15 GMT, Wolfie <bgbdwolf@gte.net> wrote:
>
> "Fred" wrote
>
>> Question for lawyers: doesn't the requirement to post bail, in any amount,
>> go against the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" ?
>
> "Innocent unt
|
|
|
On 20 Sep 2003 00:07:38 -0700 preplexual <incoming@scriptball.com> whittled these words:
> lets say someone got a bogus ticket from a red light camera
> its complete bs, red light camera went off when he was turning right
> for some reason
> if fou
|
|
|
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 08:05:51 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
[Gibbering, blustering and drooling deleted]
>Okay, let's look at the facts. My original statement was:
> "The ROGUE Florida Supreme Court let a second
|
|
|
In article <6bd12cd6.0309200816.964e022@posting.google.com>,
s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) wrote:
> And she will settle.
What kind of crap is this? You can't "settle" a criminal trial. The
complaint is now completely out of her hands.
--
|
|
|
Sergiu,
If your expertise is computers it may be that you do not have the
requisite expertise to represent yourself legally in a bankruptcy hearing.
You need to speak with someone who has the necessary expertise and perhaps
hire someone to advise
|
|
|
On 20 Sep 2003 02:54:27 -0700 Dennis B <dennis6449@yahoo.com> whittled these words:
> Could someone please explain why the new public foundations known as
> "women's giving circles" are not discriminatory? If men started a
> public foundation that don
|
|
|
"Fred" wrote
> Question for lawyers: doesn't the requirement to post bail, in any amount,
> go against the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" ?
"Innocent until proven guilty" just explains the burden of proof.
Many other countries use s
|
|
|
In article <b8ed4b07.0309182325.e83240e@posting.google.com>,
No Time <omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote:
>tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<bjr4ap$m96@rac1.wam.umd.edu>...
>
>> >
>> >Then you should have stuck to those facts instead of hauling i
|
|
|
In misc.legal ptsc <ptsc@nowhere.com> wrote:
> I have placed the docket and complaint online for the $100 million antitrust
> suit by Netster's parent company (Popular Enterprises) against VeriSign, Inc.
> for their latest stunt of hijacking unclaimed
|
|
|
When one is left with no substantive response with which to refute his
opponent, he turns to personal invective. Ken Smith makes a habit of it
against me, now I see that you are doing likewise.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
|
|
On 19 Sep 2003 15:14:37 -0700 LuXx <abbiehoffman@msn.com> whittled these words:
> I don't really trust the landlord and think they'll do anything to
> make things more difficult/take money from me...
Then definetely don't leave it. Make sure to do
|
|
|
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:48:59 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
>Daniel Packman wrote:
>> In article <D%Fab.1541$8b1.21171@news.uswest.net>, => Vox Populi ©
>> <-> wrote:
>>> Daniel Packman wrote:
>>>> In article <988glvccb7rnu7cd96163o
|
|
|
"Hunter1" <hunter1@arach.net.au> wrote in message
news:3f6bbf3b@funnel.arach.net.au...
>
> As for missionaries in India, who cares if they preach?
It isn't preaching we are talking about, stupid.
can't you get it thr' thick skull?
Damn sobs ca
|
|
|
"Robert Lee" <cranchingwire@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:cranchingwire-511B13.12155220092003@news.west.earthlink.net...
> In article <6bd12cd6.0309200816.964e022@posting.google.com>,
> s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) wrote:
|
|
|
"Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> wrote in message news:<qi-dnSqJwazkBfGiXTWJlg@comcast.com>...
> "s_knight8" <s_knight8@hotmail.com> wrote
> > In the world we have, there will be no trial. His accuser will agree
> > to a settlement out of fear and exaspe
|
|
|
"stargazer" <stargazer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gn%ab.4977$an.2373@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>
> "s_knight8" <s_knight8@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6bd12cd6.0309200810.2f2272fa@posting.google.com...
> >
>
http://www.rockymounta
|
|
|
in article nsunmvchlocgkrq9nq0g098jfconnr9bkl@4ax.com, Jon Beaver at
jbeaver@NO.com wrote on 9/20/03 4:18 PM:
> On 20 Sep 2003 06:50:03 GMT, solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote:
>
>> And i guess that i will chime in here with my reason to "doubt"
|
|
|
On 20 Sep 2003 18:43:18 GMT, TOTE@dog-play.com wrote:
>I tried to two variations (existing domain, non-existent page) vs.
>non-existent domain) in Lynx. For the existing domain, non-existent page I
>got what is clearly a 404- error. I got the
|
|
|
abuse@verizon.net
|
|
