misc.legal

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 22:41:36 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: >Mr. F. Le Mur wrote: >> On 1 Oct 2003 19:16:22 -0700, s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) wrote: >> >> ->The 61-page booklets promote "jury nullification," a concept promoted >>

Jennifer wrote: > "Zen Cohen" <aturny@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:8gIeb.28995$iH6.20559@twister.austin.rr.com... > Thanks for replying Zen -- >> > In June 2003, one of the creditors tracked me down. My questions are >> -- >> > 1.

Chas Interesting, which case are you referring to? Is this something you've initiated on your own, or something you've been following? Do you have a link to the original complaint, and was it filed in federal or state court? Regards Greg >

s_knight8 wrote: > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=519&ncid=519&e=8&u=/ap/ > 20031001/ap_on_re_us/biblical_booklets > GOLDEN, Colo. - A county treasurer is handing out booklets to > potential jurors saying they are answerable "onl

Would it be easier to kill President Bush through poison by attending one of his fund raising dinners. He should be having quite a few of those campaigning for re-election. Kevin Lindquist Longwood, FL P.S. The Mob made me do it.

tod wrote: > Hi, > In the six years I've owned my car, it's been mauled twice by wayward > shopping carts. The first one was a runaway shopping cart in a Kroger > parking lot. It cost me $700 in repairs. I didn't attempt to collect. > I filled o

Pretty much my experience too. It is a process whereby the partipants are rewarded for convictions -- not justice! -- No Snarling Bitches Anti Extremist Radical Feminist http://nosnarling#@&@^es.home.comcat.net "Rauni" <LadyWolf@newsguy.com>

"Zen Cohen" <aturny@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:8gIeb.28995$iH6.20559@twister.austin.rr.com... Thanks for replying Zen -- > > In June 2003, one of the creditors tracked me down. My questions are -- > > 1. Am I still legally responsible f

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 18:49:39 -0500, an orbiting mind control laser caused Peter H. Proctor <drp@drproctor.com> to write: > Judicial corruption does exist. It consists more of taking >care of your friends at the expense of litigants, rather

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 12:13:29 -0600, "Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> wrote: >"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote >> >Why do you think that you people are such a bad joke? >> Why do you think lawyers are part of the "court system?" There's your >> ans

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 15:52:43 -0500, an orbiting mind control laser caused Peter H. Proctor <drp@drproctor.com> to write: > Naturally, the bar greivance committee buried it, with an >admonition that taking the matter to the press was illegal.

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 15:52:43 -0500, Peter H. Proctor <drp@drproctor.com> wrote: >On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:00:58 -0600, "Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> >wrote: > >>"Peter H. Proctor" <drp@drproctor.com> wrote >>> In Texas, there is/was a law

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 11:50:28 -0500, Peter H. Proctor <drp@drproctor.com> wrote: >On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:11:18 -0600, "Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> >wrote: > >>I thought it was hilarious when they disbanded the Grievance Committee, >>locked the rec

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 22:43:21 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: > And to think that *YOU* are the sworn guardian of our rights and >liberties?!? "Sworn guardian?" Are you mad? If you aren't my client, I ain't "guardian" of your

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 07:51:44 -0400, "Blip!" <nospam@nospam.com> >In article <no-C6A4A8.14375128092003@news.la.sbcglobal.net>, "no" ><no@no.com> wrote: > >> In article <bl4nhq$7uu$1@driftwood.ccs.carleton.ca>, >> Kevin <nomail@nospam.invalid> wrot

Jon Beaver wrote: > On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:00:23 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> > wrote: > >Jon Beaver wrote: > >> On 30 Sep 2003 08:59:49 -0700, jtnospam@yahoo.com (jitney) wrote: > >> > >> >There are some well stated points here. > >>

Chas wrote: > "Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote > > Whining about "corruption" is immature. Factor it into your plan and > > move on. They'll stab you in the back? Don't let them get behind > > you. They"ll say you didn't pay? Get a receipt.

Jon Beaver wrote: > On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:57:48 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> > wrote: > >Jon Beaver wrote: > >> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:37:55 -0600, "Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> > >> wrote: > >> >"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote

s_knight8 wrote: > GOLDEN, Colo. - A county treasurer is handing out booklets to > potential jurors saying they are answerable "only to God almighty" and > not to the law when it comes to deliberations. Good for him! > The 61-page booklets promot

Chas wrote: > "Ken Smith" <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote > > > Why do you think that you people are such a bad joke? > > As Dershowitz said (about lawyers, btw), "Any group that has a > > reputation like that has done *something* to deserve it."

"Theodore A. Kaldis" wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > Jon Beaver wrote: > >> jitney wrote: > > >>> There are some well stated points here. I believe the main function of > >>> the jury is as a barrier to judicial corruption. > > >> Judicial corrupt

> > Having said that, the basic flaw in the decision is that free-speech > > was never the issue. The real issue is whether or not it's my > > responsibility to furnish the means by which others can have their > > speech reach me. > > > This is

Mr. F. Le Mur wrote: > On 1 Oct 2003 19:16:22 -0700, s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) wrote: > > ->The 61-page booklets promote "jury nullification," a concept promoted > ->by conservative groups that say juries have the right to not only > ->decid

Child wrote: > "Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:3F7BA6BB.3020303@hotmail.com... > >>Child wrote: >> >>>"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:3F7B9FCC.30305@hotmail.com... >>> >>> >>>>Robert Lee wrote: >>>>

The Terran carbon-based unit designating itself as "AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net> shared its ideas in misc.legal on Wed, 01 Oct 2003 20:31:00 GMT: > > "Douglas S. Ladden" <nospamreply@nowayjose.org> wrote in message > news:Xns94077BA35DBABLega

I'll put it a different way. Congress and the the FTC/FCC did not say "Here's categories of speech and here's where we will allow them." That's forbidden, I'd say. Instead they said "Here's a mode of communication - one not pertinent to free sp

"Jim Alder" <jimalder@ssnet.com> wrote in message news:Xns9407AEB8379C3jimaldersssnetcom@216.168.3.44... > > > > Why not? It's a great joke, and since he's not a judge, he > > would probably get a chuckle from it. Heck, he could even > > tell it

Child wrote: > "Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:3F7B9FCC.30305@hotmail.com... > >>Robert Lee wrote: >> >>>In article <3F7B7C08.6080904@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Did the SS INTEND t

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 17:32:11 GMT, David Friedman <ddfr@daviddfriedmanNOSPAM.com.invalid> wrote: >One possible compromise would be to require that the company be willing >to sell the hardware that the A.I. was running on to the A.I.--assuming >it w

"Plainsman" <Plainsman@NOSPAMcableone.net> wrote in message news:vnma01aeo7eu11@corp.supernews.com... > You are finishing your basement in your home. You get your building permit, > do the work yourself and get the completed work inspected. > > The

Chas wrote: > "Ellen Mercer" <EllenAMercer@aol.com> wrote > >>This is scary- you are very very clearly *certain* that he "forced >>himself on her". But *how*? How can you *possibly* be certain of this >>disputed fact, given that you were nowhere nea

"Jennifer Lynn" <jenlyn@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:lyGeb.1175$3S.875@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net... > In July 1990, I moved to another state and left no forwarding address. I > also left some unpaid bills, one of which is just over $10

"Ellen Mercer" <EllenAMercer@aol.com> wrote > This is scary- you are very very clearly *certain* that he "forced > himself on her". But *how*? How can you *possibly* be certain of this > disputed fact, given that you were nowhere near him at the time?

Robert Lee wrote: > In article <6bd12cd6.0310011816.3180a77@posting.google.com>, > s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) wrote: > > >>http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=519&ncid=519&e=8&u=/ap/200 >>31001/ap_on_re_us/biblical_booklets >>

s_knight8 wrote: > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=519&ncid=519&e=8&u=/ap/20031001/ap_on_re_us/biblical_booklets > > GOLDEN, Colo. - A county treasurer is handing out booklets to > potential jurors saying they are answerable "only to

"Peter H. Proctor" <drp@drproctor.com> wrote in message news:941mnv86rbkbh466kr30djk6ufbk7aptvb@4ax.com... > On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:11:18 -0600, "Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> > wrote: > > >I thought it was hilarious when they disbanded the Grievanc

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:56:28 -0400, "McWebber" <mcwebber@my-deja.com> wrote: >"AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net> wrote in message >news:vnlfmjhospic06@corp.supernews.com... >> his phone for as long as he wants. But where does it say he has to right

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:48:21 -0400, "AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net> wrote: > But where does it say he has to right to >the use of *my* appliance and *my* electricity to get me to listen? Oklahoma.

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 20:47:16 GMT, "brad.madison" <brad.madison@mail.tds.net> wrote: > > >Douglas S. Ladden wrote: >> >> It is a long-standing foundation of First Amendment law that prior >> restraints on speech based on their content are n

I had to pass along this gem from misc.legal.moderated. On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 16:42:28 -0400, Paul Robinson <postmaster@paul.washington.dc.us> wrote: >"Robert H. Risch" wrote: > >> On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 09:24:34 -0400, "Stuart O. Bronstein" >> <stu@

Robert Lee wrote: > In article <3F7B7C08.6080904@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > >>Did the SS INTEND to destroy Jews when they were all required to >>register and wear arm bands? >> >>Same crap, different victims. > >

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 19:09:35 GMT, "Douglas S. Ladden" <nospamreply@nowayjose.org> wrote: >The Terran carbon-based unit designating itself as "AllYou!" ><idaman@conversent.net> shared its ideas in misc.legal on Wed, 01 Oct >2003 18:50:43 GMT: > >>

"Larry" <none@nowhere.com> wrote > >And conspiracy is probably the single most charged crime in America. > >Good thinking. > What America are you living in? The one wherein conspiracy is charged next to just about any other felony- you? > Conspi

"Marc DeLuca" <Marc@CompatibleForms.com> wrote in news:CyEeb.9645$_N1.9042@twister.austin.rr.com: > > "jitney" <jtnospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:b8002be7.0310010805.7c5d0fbf@posting.google.com... >> Where did you find this attorney? I

On 2 Oct 2003 04:12:45 GMT, blujuju <jumping@shadows.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: > >A true intelligence would, indeed, decide for itself. >Just imagine being a 'new' sentient species. >What would you do? > I'd want to get a blowjob, first

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:42:03 -1000, "Maxie P. Diddly" <mepi@do.not.spam.me.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: > >Right, which is exactly why I say it shoudn't be confined by our >"laws". > If you don't have to follow them, are they really "laws"? L

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:33:49 -0400, Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote: >In article <1064933933.724452@irys.nyx.net> in misc.consumers, Barry >Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote: >>No, I *don't* approve of a threat to a judge. I approve of peop

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:22:28 -1000, "Maxie P. Diddly" <mepi@do.not.spam.me.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: >> the other night. >> I should have said 'a cop 'should' be able to think about a >> situation, not react. > >Remember, robocop wasn't allow

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:29:08 -0400, Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote: >In article <%v9eb.158608$0v4.11899583@bgtnsc04- >news.ops.worldnet.att.net> in misc.consumers, DGDevin ><dgdevin@worldnet.att.invalid> wrote: >>"Threat?" Since wh

"Karl Hungus" <karlhungus@comcast.net> wrote in news:H86eb.634790$Ho3.123451@sccrnsc03: > > "Jim Alder" <jimalder@ssnet.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9405E2C745F5Cjimaldersssnetcom@216.168.3.44... >> Frank Ney <n4zhg@icqmail.com> wrote in >> n