|
|
David Marc Nieporent wrote
>>>Yes.
>
>>David, this is a tough concept for him to grasp. I hope he appreciates
>>your simplicity.
>
>"I tried a one syllable word. Harder to misread. Not impossible, of course.
Thanks David !!! Its great to see
|
|
|
Robert H. Risch wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 18:45:41 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Robert H. Risch wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:32:25 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The function of law is to
|
|
|
"Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:TkEfb.24560$f11.17135@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
[...]
> > Suppose A kidnaps B in New York, transports B to NEw Jersey, and keeps
her
> > hostage there for a week. Both states can try
|
|
|
"Larry" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:none-0410031407080001@192.168.2.4...
> In article <vnto4pn2j0223e@corp.supernews.com>, "Larry Smith"
> <dbrigman3@charter.net> wrote:
>
> >"Robert H. Risch" <rhrisch@optonline.net> wrote in message
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
news:o6utnvso49n0iot12r64ad0masjsq4d3nu@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 16:08:13 GMT, Robert H. Risch
> <rhrisch@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 08:44:38 -0700, Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.c
|
|
|
"David Marc Nieporent" <nieporen@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote in message
news:nieporen-E8349C.18082904102003@news.fu-berlin.de...
> In article <cJGfb.25255$f11.15931@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >"Dav
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
news:h1rtnv4i27nrmb9243gkq2egqptm744fo6@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:51:37 -0400, "Larry Smith"
> <dbrigman3@charter.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >"David Marc Nieporent" <nieporen@alumni.princeton.edu> w
|
|
|
Larry wrote
"A ctually, last I looked, Jon, David, and I disagree with your definition,
while only Chas supports it So if we want to keep score, I think its 3-2, you
lose. Specifically, 3 lawyers to 2 non-lawyers."
Oooooh. Tight score. Kinda lik
|
|
|
GAG ORDER???
I guess Black People don't deserve equal treatment under the law in Eagle
Colorado?
"s_knight8" <s_knight8@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6bd12cd6.0310041857.12c3d535@posting.google.com...
> http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/200
|
|
|
"Crosscut" <yes@its.me.yup> wrote in message
news:isqunvcp35k2mtg28m40p32s6ljhmljeoq@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 16:21:51 -0400, "AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net>
wrote:
>
> >
> >"Crosscut" <yes@its.me.yup> wrote in message
> >news:nvjtnv0bd4
|
|
|
In article <p3Hfb.1718$Qy2.324@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>, "Bo
Raxo" <invasions_r_us@thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote:
> It
> is one template for explaining the facts in this case, and worth
> discussing,
It's certainly a more reasona
|
|
|
I have 5000 americana negatives dated 1880's thru 1920 or so... mostly
turnof the century which I wantt o market.
What are the applicable copyright laws relevant to this vintage
collection.
Some of the photos do not even have a name of the phtogra
|
|
|
You just can't stop, can you? It is a little late to pretend
you want to hold a civil argument or discussion. You are just
completely full of it. I've documented my facts and you've done
nothing but spew juvenile ridicule. You even admit it.
G
|
|
|
"Robert Lee" <cranchingwire@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:cranchingwire-475583.11163504102003@news.east.earthlink.net...
> In article <836unvsh3bhi6ki8s1sjca27gbfucoo49b@4ax.com>,
> lemurama@comxcast.net wrote:
>
> >
> > ->>
|
|
|
"Gary Collard" <garycollard@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:3F7EFAE9.A3EA6918@netscape.net...
> Bo Raxo wrote:
> >
> > "eichler4" <eichler4@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:lWrfb.400732$2x.135905@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net...
> > > I don'
|
|
|
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003, Captain James T. Kirk <localhost@nobody> wrote:
>Oh, is Leisure Suit Larry Bullis here too? Cool! His ass must've
>cooled after being busted impersonating an officer of the court.
No. The Larry on misc.legal is a prosecutor of
|
|
|
"Mr. F. Le Mur" <lemurama@comxcast.net> wrote in message
news:i4htnvg7rnj4qg0do280b0ebvos18pljrr@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 09:32:14 GMT, "Bo Raxo"
> <invasions_r_us@thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote:
>
> ->
> ->"eichler4" <eichler4@comcast.
|
|
|
boo
"Bill Smith" <xfwsexyg6001@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:tREfb.37696$%h1.26037@sccrnsc02...
> Well, It's been confirmed. Extorting a merchant is socially un-acceptable
> and illegal. Ya want gentle, go see mumsie. she'll kiss it and make
|
|
|
ood luck... Try a shrink... I hear they can talk you through it.
"Bill Smith" <xfwsexyg6001@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:hkMfb.219828$mp.136901@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net...
> Well, damn. Looks like I'll have to go back to girls then. Oh, wel
|
|
|
In article <kk6unv819smicj6slmhi9f7bnl3u7ag332@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:58:25 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <rmjsnv820vrd2cslsdmhpd4jlnlgftl645@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
>
|
|
|
Merlin wrote
"Jon's right. It was YOU, Scout, who whined that lawyers have a 'majority of
input' and were 'largely to blame' for 'complaints about things that lawyers
have nothing to do with'."
Scout replied
"Ok....if you can show me those
|
|
|
In article <dg6unvgu5e5a8sjpttbmuiij0ac8itt0d5@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:59:15 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <cljsnvc8nohd0u8pgaaa9jd0hcs0i0siho@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
>
|
|
|
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 12:38:20 -0400 (EDT), thisisme <thisisme@cotse.net>
>I have composed this theoretical scenario. A car
>is stopped at the line before an intersection
>which is controlled by a traffic signal, in the
>rightmost lane. The intersecti
|
|
|
"Asmodeus" <asmodeus@removeinsightbb.com> wrote in message
news:Xns940AA37606B6Easmodeusinsightbbcom@204.127.199.17...
> David Marc Nieporent <nieporen@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote in
> news:nieporen-0D4DD2.16553204102003@news.fu-berlin.de:
>
> > He
|
|
|
tjab wrote:
> In article <3F7F5A4A.1030802@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>s_knight8 wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-kobe4oct04,1,2495903.story?coll=la-headlines-sports
>>>
>>>Prosecutors plan to retain a str
|
|
|
"David Marc Nieporent" <nieporen@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote in message
news:nieporen-0D4DD2.16553204102003@news.fu-berlin.de...
> In article <WCBfb.28228$3S.238@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >"Jon Be
|
|
|
In article <3F7F5A4A.1030802@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>s_knight8 wrote:
>> http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-kobe4oct04,1,2495903.story?coll=la-headlines-sports
>>
>> Prosecutors plan to retain a strangulation expert in the
|
|
|
In article <noGfb.28615$3S.25204@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"Allen L. Barker" <alb@datafilter.com> wrote:
> A head full of ignorance is more like it. You apparently did not
> even know the technology existed until a few days ago.
I sti
|
|
|
David Marc Nieporent <nieporen@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote in
news:nieporen-0D4DD2.16553204102003@news.fu-berlin.de:
> He's a PTA member when he's on the PTA, not a
> plumber
On what planet?
--
/"\ ||
\ / ASCII
|
|
|
In article <24736aee.0310021032.589ce8e9@posting.google.com>,
weaselaw@aol.com (Clay S. Conrad) wrote:
> Juries have the prerogative to nullify. There is no reason not to
> have them informed as to that right. While judges can prevent lawyers
> f
|
|
|
Robert Lee wrote:
> In article <z8Gfb.28539$3S.17358@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "Allen L. Barker" <alb@datafilter.com> wrote:
>
>>Robert Lee wrote:
>>
>>>In article <0UFfb.28517$3S.14822@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
>>>"Allen L.
|
|
|
Your're safe if you take off the license plates and sell the car with a
bill of sale.
Without plates, the car cannot be driven on the road. The buyer is forced
to get the car licensed at the DMV and you are in the clear. (Buyer can get
"temporary"
|
|
|
>> I didn't realize till today that the list does not
>> restrict calls from political organizations or so-called
>> charities. Hell, most of the calls I get are probably from
>> those sleazy "charities" (e.g. "support our firemen," "help our
>> cops
|
|
|
It's common sense that if debris is blocking the right-of-
way (ROW), then an individual may stop and move it to the
side (safety permitting), for instance a rock or a hub cap
in the middle of the street.
What is the law that actually permits an ind
|
|
|
In article <z8Gfb.28539$3S.17358@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"Allen L. Barker" <alb@datafilter.com> wrote:
> Robert Lee wrote:
> > In article <0UFfb.28517$3S.14822@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> > "Allen L. Barker" <alb@datafilter.com
|
|
|
Robert Lee wrote:
> In article <0UFfb.28517$3S.14822@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "Allen L. Barker" <alb@datafilter.com> wrote:
>
>> (And I have
>>fairly thick skin by now :-).
>
> Well, I'd assume so, what with all those implants going
|
|
|
'm sorry if I'm breakin your heart.
But I am taken.
"Bill Smith" <xfwsexyg6001@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:0ULfb.499331$cF.176664@rwcrnsc53...
> Aw gee, yer breakin my heart here. Well, so much for little boys.
>
> "Mr. X" <greenbaboon1@
|
|
|
In article <0UFfb.28517$3S.14822@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"Allen L. Barker" <alb@datafilter.com> wrote:
> (And I have
> fairly thick skin by now :-).
Well, I'd assume so, what with all those implants going in and out of
you.
--Rob
|
|
|
scoopdamedia wrote:
> For those in alt.mindcontrol who wonder about Mr. Barker's attackers. Mr
> Barker posts in multple ng groups, such as misc.legal, and alt.true-crime.
> Therefore these people probably are not readers of alt.mindcontrol.
> This m
|
|
|
Geoff Cashman wrote:
> In article <smofb.18879$f11.5018@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> Allen L. Barker <alb@datafilter.com> wrote:
>
>>There are
>>known and documented victims of mind control abuses in the
>>population.
>
>
> Really! C
|
|
|
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/09/30/48hours/main575936.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/09/30/48hours/main575940.shtml
(CBS) "There is no doubt in my mind that she has been taken advantage
of by Kobe Bryant. There is no doubt in my m
|
|
|
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 16:21:51 -0400, "AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net> wrote:
>
>"Crosscut" <yes@its.me.yup> wrote in message
>news:nvjtnv0bd4i0t32qgp8lnrv0rcd9sjbesa@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 06:42:42 -0400, "AllYou!" <idaman@conversent.net>
|
|
|
"Larry" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:none-0410031513570001@192.168.2.4...
> In article <SmEfb.24587$f11.4004@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >"Larry" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
|
|
|
"Larry" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:none-0410031511530001@192.168.2.4...
> In article <F6Dfb.23735$f11.12623@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
|
|
|
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 21:30:52 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
>In article <kk6unv819smicj6slmhi9f7bnl3u7ag332@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
><stars@bars> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:58:25 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
>> wrote:
|
|
|
"Larry" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:none-0410031510210001@192.168.2.4...
> In article <usEfb.24657$f11.3686@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >"Larry" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
|
|
|
In article <SmEfb.24587$f11.4004@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote:
>"Larry" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>news:none-0410031409280001@192.168.2.4...
>> In article <Rgzfb.27721$3S.25981@newsread2.news.atl
|
|
|
In article <F6Dfb.23735$f11.12623@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote:
>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
>news:bnrtnvctodcvjidu17pms5c2bja4q15k1j@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 15:21:14 GMT, "Sco
|
|
|
In article <usEfb.24657$f11.3686@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote:
>"Larry" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>news:none-0410031430050001@192.168.2.4...
>> In article <hfzfb.27713$3S.13672@newsread2.news.atl
|
|
|
Well, It's been confirmed. Extorting a merchant is socially un-acceptable
and illegal. Ya want gentle, go see mumsie. she'll kiss it and make it all
better for you.
"Mr. X" <greenbaboon1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:BHDfb.12785$gi2.11627@fed1read01.
|
