|
Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Cable & Wireless Internet Serv., Inc.
The CAFC found that the appellant had failed to meet the burden of showing
that no reasonable jury could have found the disputed claims to be
nonobvious in light of the evidence presented. Namely, the CAFC was unable
to discern any suggestion or motivation to combine the references as the
appellant suggested.
For more patent information, see
http://www.patentcribsheet.com/Cases/akamai.html.
--------------------------------
This posting contains educational information for lawyers directly
impacting patent preparation and prosecution. It does not constitute legal
advice, nor does it create or constitute any attorney-client relationship.
|
| |
| |
|
