misc.legal

Maren Purves wrote: > azzuri wrote: > > I am getting ready to form an service related internet business, which could > > not be profitable in the first year or 2. The revenue will most likely be > > coming from US businesses. I reside and work in

The only real evidence that mattered at the preliminary hearing was the complainant's statement that the sex was nonconsensual. There was nothing to really rebut that. Lack of injuries - if that is the case - doesn't rebut that. An absence of evid

"Robert Lee" <cranchingwire@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote in message news:Xns941B7D363D03Ccranchingwireearthli@207.69.154.206... > "Alex" <avdeelen.REMOF@wanadoo.nl> wrote in news:3f955ec8$0$2730 > $1b62eedf@news.euronet.nl: > > > Well it sti

"Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote: >"Merlin" <mag@camelot.org> wrote in message >> "Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote: >> >"Merlin" <mag@camelot.org> wrote in message >> >> "Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote: >> >> >Tell me why you ask

solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote: >>Jon Beaver wrote > >> What "record," Counsel? You mean, the "motion" for the "order" requiring the >IME? > >Are you completely stupid? I said I WANT YOU TO POST THE BAR'S BRIEF >TO THE COLORADO SUPREME C

I'm crumbling under the pressure of living with this situation, so maybe someone out there can give me some advice. I don't know what to do (although I'm afraid I think I know the answer, which is "nothing"). My mom's side of the family is incapable

none@nowhere.com (Larry) wrote: >In article <3F8DBC45.806A929F@concentric.net>, Ken Smith ><Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >> >> Yeah, I'd say that our Cub Pwosseccuta is throwing himself a tantrum >>-- at 2:00 PM on the East Coast, and presumabl

tangerine987654@yahoo.com (John) wrote: >Okay, so let's just say, *hypothetically*, I have a Microsoft program, >where I made a copy of the CD at the office, and copied the serial >number, and installed it at home. Everything is fine. Then I get >

Daniel Myers <dhm@best.com> wrote: > > >> >Faculty questions provost's standing >> >The University of the District of Columbia's faculty Senate is challenging >> >the hiring decisions of the school's top academic officer, whose credentials >> >it

solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote: >"Merlin" wrote >Back on topic, according to Black's, a JD is now the basic law degree, >replacing the "LL.B" in the late 1960's. In other words, its *just* a >BACHELOR'S degree. The LL.M is the lawyers "master

"Ellen Mercer" <EllenAMercer@aol.com> wrote in message news:e9d4487a.0310201644.179eb0c3@posting.google.com... <pompous tight ass #@&@^ talk snipped> > Me? I just laugh my a** off over people like that. What better > evidence can there be that one

When I first had aspirations of becoming university educated when I was 20 years old, after my first time in prison, I became interested in a political science degree because it required the least amount of math. Many lawyers, apparently, felt likew

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:09:22 -0400, "rayscar" <rayscar@pagescriptersNOSPAM.com> wrote: >I belong to a club which is a 501(c)3 organization which has a set of >bylaws. Not to be too picky, but it's very unlikely that a "club" would be a 501(c)(3)

John wrote: > Okay, so let's just say, *hypothetically*, I have a Microsoft program, > where I made a copy of the CD at the office, and copied the serial > number, and installed it at home. Everything is fine. Then I get > Cable modem at home, so

rayscar wrote: > I belong to a club which is a 501(c)3 organization which has a set of > bylaws. The club president left her position prior to fulfilling her term > of one year of service. At this point, the club is faced with a Catch-22 > thing.

Christopher Green wrote: > hydrojunky@hotmail.com (mr trademark) wrote in message > news:<a85f8a98.0310181741.3e2156be@posting.google.com>... >> Trademark Question am I slimy or smart? > [proposal to engage in trademark infringement and domain name

"Merlin" <mag@camelot.org> wrote in message news:3f95beac.13679640@news.sf.sbcglobal.net... > "Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote: > >"Merlin" <mag@camelot.org> wrote in message > >> "Scout" <scout_x@earthlink.net> wrote: > >> >"Merlin" <mag@came

Christine wrote: > Hi all...I hope I am posting this on the appropriate board - it's my > first time. As many people, I was recently laid off and I am > collecting unemployment benefits in Missouri. It is becoming nearly > impossible to continue p

Hey, "Primate" <Chick_Hearn_Rules@Yahoo.com>... I'm LAUGHING at the "superior intellect": >"Jon Enslin" <enslinjREMOVEATYOUROWNRISK@uww.edu> wrote in message >news:3F9595CE.6050908@uww.edu... >> Primate wrote: >> >> > "Jon Enslin" <enslinjREMOVEA

"Larry Coon" <lmcoon@nospam_cox.net> wrote > > 'light most favorable to the Prosecution' means accepting the evidence as > > offered- > FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER THERE IS PROBABLE > CAUSE. You missed that part. Well, the judge didn't

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 01:46:46 GMT, "Morton Davis" <oglethorpe@oglethorpe.com> wrote: > >"Merlin" <mag@camelot.org> wrote in message >news:3f95beac.13679640@news.sf.sbcglobal.net... > > >> Sorry, the jury is not a lawless mob "at large" to impose a

white dove wrote: > Car 3 hits Car 2 and Car 2 is pushed into Car 1. Car 3 runs like hell and > no one remembers the license plate. This was on the highway where everyone > was very concerned about getting into the emergency lane and not causing >

"Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> wrote in news:yY-dnTNR7oP6DAiiRVn-hg@comcast.com: > Subject: Re: Mackey receives more than 40 death threats > From: "Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> > Newsgroups: > alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers,soc.men,misc.lega

"Don Tiberone" <weswNOSPAM@concentric.net> wrote > You're desperately spinning here. Actually, as someone said here in another post; it's black letter law. > How about spinning this? > "Almost all of the evidence introduced at the preliminary > h

"Alson Wong" <alsonwong@charter.net.block> wrote > Larry's Razor. "The most obvious answer couldn't possibly be right." c.

"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote >....THAT > is the PROPER standard for malicious prosecution, if the > prosecution decides to bring the case to trial. I don't know > whether it's the legal standard. 'Malicious' prosecution impl

Larry Coon" <lcnospam@assist.org> wrote > (sorry it took a while to get back to you on this one) never a worry, buddy. > You keep using this same non-sequiter. She didn't go to > the police and say Kobe gave her a perineal abrasion. She > went

"Bloated Elvis" <returntosender@notell.hotel.not> wrote in message news:qtrapv4f1ml37fh361ppqc7ufmvfcpau6v@4ax.com... > I'm writing up a simple promissory note to loan a family member the > money to buy a car. My note states, "This Note is secured by

"cindykapitan" <cindykapitan@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:d6d9d9c8.0310211019.302aee4a@posting.google.com... > In Colorado, CRCP Rule 60 allows Motion or independent action for > Relief from a Judgment. Does that mean that a party can file a Moti

[Primate (Chick_Hearn_Rules@Yahoo.com)] [Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:58:22 -0700] :Think about the distance between vagina and anus. Think about the severity :of an injury spanning those two points. Now, think about what the accuser :did after she receive

second@duelingoak.com (Messalina) wrote in news:7111e10e.0310210837.384c9d5d@posting.google.com: > Hoist on her petard, I say. > LOL. Everybody knows women don't *have* petards. -- --Robert but if they knew you'd shoot yourself a beas

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:18:27 GMT, Dan Evans <dan@evans-legal.com> wrote: Thanks all for such a great and speedy reply >On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 19:44:23 GMT, "Zen Cohen" <aturny@hotmail.com> >wrote: > >>"Randy" <randy2001@mail.com> wrote in message

"Alex" <avdeelen.REMOF@wanadoo.nl> wrote in news:3f955ec8$0$2730 $1b62eedf@news.euronet.nl: > Well it still doesn't make sense. There is no hard object there to create > a scratch to the pericardeum Not even in the right area of the body. (Also m

"brink" <forget@about.it> wrote in news:bn3sh5$tbv5i$2@ID-177982.news.uni-berlin.de: >> The area between the vagina and the anus is called the perineum. > > bzzzt... everyone knows that's not true... it's called the "taint"! > ;-) Beat me

If somebody dies, how long is it supposed to be before the will is read or probated? How long should other possible people on the will wait before they mention it to the spouse of the deceased who has not "probated" it (whatever tha means)? What is t

edpac@comcast.net (ed) wrote in message news:<a18fc5c2.0310210931.54468e63@posting.google.com>... > thanks for the input, we have sent her a letter certified mail saying > we will be out on Nov. 20th, we are on a written lease the ends March > 31st but

"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote > When the evidence is read in a light most favorable to the > prosecution, it's barely sufficient to indict, and FAR short > of sufficient to convict. That's what the judge said, in > almost those very wor

"Miguelito" <MickBarr@juno.com> wrote > > When the evidence is read in a light most favorable to the Prosecution, that > > simply means that all things being equal, he'd be found Guilty today. > How do you get that? When read in a light most favor

In article <a0133f8d.0310210946.1fcd1e3a@posting.google.com>, Magic Nose Goblin <magicnosegob@yahoo.com> wrote: >tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<bn20ac$sua@rac1.wam.umd.edu>... >> In article <a0133f8d.0310201541.2bf6280c@posting.google.c

Collector? or Junk? On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:58:22 -0500, "Claude Balls" <ClaudeBalls@Lion.Tamer> wrote: > SSchellnas wrote: > > > The city of Danville,CA took 10 of my collector cars and 2 collector >> boats. >> I need to stop them from

"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:3F95AFB3.C0A11D@sprintmail.com... > Chas wrote: > > > "1" <1@1.com> wrote > > > All I know is that the DA better have something or he is in for a > > > countersuit... > > > > Ac

"ag" <latifehm2003@yahoo.com> wrote > Bend over Chas and take it like a man (if indeed you are one). Well come suck my dick and see if I giggle, if there's a question in your mind; #@&@^. Chas

"tinydancer/stargazer" <tinydancer@nospam.com> schreef in bericht news:4nclb.16426$W77.6010@bignews6.bellsouth.net... > > "Alex" <avdeelen.REMOF@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message > > > > "Jon Enslin" <enslinjREMOVEATYOUROWNRISK@uww.edu> schreef in bericht

"Larry Coon" <lcnospam@assist.org> wrote in message news:3F955604.5DF1@assist.org... > Chas wrote: > > > If she went for a walk with three guys, and only one of them beat her up and > > left her in a ditch, the number of walks she took makes no diff

Chas wrote: > 'light most favorable to the Prosecution' means accepting the evidence as > offered- FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER THERE IS PROBABLE CAUSE. You missed that part. > and that, obviously, would result in a guilty verdict.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/21/news/opinion/courtwatch/main579210.shtml So while defense attorneys said Monday that they were, "of course, disappointed," they surely were not surprised. They didn't aggressively attack the prosecution's lon

The same way they united against Clinton? At least they are consistent.

magicnosegob@yahoo.com (Magic Nose Goblin) wrote in message news:<a0133f8d.0310210946.1fcd1e3a@posting.google.com>... > tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<bn20ac$sua@rac1.wam.umd.edu>... > > In article <a0133f8d.0310201541.2bf6280c@posting.g

"Paul Robinson" <postmaster@paul.washington.dc.us> wrote in message news:3F959B3B.CA1CEAAB@paul.washington.dc.us... > Since you were the victim of hit and run, you should be covered under uninsured > motorist rather than comp/collision. They told m

I'm writing up a simple promissory note to loan a family member the money to buy a car. My note states, "This Note is secured by ___________..." On the Certificate of Title, I have entered my name and address as the "Lienor." Obviously, I wish to s