|
|
Lee Hollaar wrote:
> In article <bnncrl01hsq@enews3.newsguy.com> "Richard" <anom@anom>
> writes:
>>"Microsoft Windows" is the registered trademark. Contrary to popular
>>belief,
>>WINDOWS is not.
> And it appears that one group who has that "po
|
|
|
Mike on 28 Oct 2003 suggested:
> What is the basis for offspring to divorce/emancipate themselves from
> parents?
It would depend on each State's laws regarding the topic. In
general, emancipation is defined as the "termination of the righ
|
|
|
ike Brown wrote:
>
> > exactly
> > not "copyright" but "LOGO" i.e. "trademark"
>
> No, Jack. Not exactly. As you would say, "wrong, wrong, wrong".
>
> It is true that I made a typographical error in the original answer,
> which I fixed, correct
|
|
|
"Dan Pressnell" <dan_pressnell@yahoo.com> the corporate blowwhore wrote:
> "Joel" <joelc999@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2ibspv4c5tvn3s28bav80t4oe3qt0d1agv@4ax.com...
> > dan_pressnell@yahoo.com (Dan Pressnell) wrote:
> >
> > >You guys just
|
|
|
"Roger Schlafly" <rogersc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:5jBnb.2019$F53.600470628@twister2.starband.net...
> "Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
> > fact, it is not generally SAID that the law is that a jury has the
> > "right" to "decide the
|
|
|
Can anyone offer suggestions on how to deal with a fee dispute with an
accounting firm. For the last three years the firm was preparing taxes
for my partnership and the bill was $500-700. This year final bill was
around $2500. There is no explanation w
|
|
|
"Richard" <anom@anom> wrote in message
news:bnncrl01hsq@enews3.newsguy.com...
> Doc wrote:
>
> > It's my understanding that a title can only be trademarked if it
> > applies to
> > a series - i.e. "Complete Idiot's Guide" etc.
>
> > Does this a
|
|
|
tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<bnn8ns$7qs@rac1.wam.umd.edu>...
> In article <a0133f8d.0310281724.6e59c832@posting.google.com>,
> Magic Nose Goblin <magicnosegob@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >"Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> wrote in message news:<
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:05:57 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net>
wrote:
> My all-time favorite Jon-quote is, "You have to stop being an angry,
>bitter, self-righteous, confrontive[sic], accusatory asshole -- that's your
>lawyer's job!" And to
|
|
|
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 02:31:03 GMT, none@nowhere.com (Larry) wrote:
>In article <3F9E9779.463EAE99@concentric.net>, Ken Smith
><Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> Think about it for a moment. I have invested literally hundreds of
>>thousands of
|
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:28:46 GMT, Doc
<docsavage20_Down@With_hot_DAMN_mail_SPAM.com> wrote:
> It's my understanding that a title can only be trademarked if it applies to
> a series - i.e. "Complete Idiot's Guide" etc.
>
> Does this apply to a serie
|
|
|
Scout wrote:
> Scout wrote:
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Scout wrote:
>>>> Scout wrote:
>>>>> Ok, you assert it is not vague. So list for me the specific and
>>>>> objective standards for which he shall be tested for. After all, if
>>>>> it
|
|
|
Doc wrote:
> It's my understanding that a title can only be trademarked if it
> applies to
> a series - i.e. "Complete Idiot's Guide" etc.
> Does this apply to a series of audio CD's - such as "Sounds Of The
> Forest",
> "Sounds Of The Forest"
|
|
|
Yardpilot wrote:
>
> "AH#49" <"AssholeT#49"@ your.net> wrote in message
> news:TVvnb.3859$78.1258225@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> > Jon Beaver wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 05:35:24 GMT, "Yardpilot" <yardpilot@comcast.net>
> > > wrote:
>
|
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:44:44 GMT, "Yardpilot" <yardpilot@comcast.net>
wrote:
>
>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
>news:580tpvs9v90jgveftc4rqpjvmldihrk7tp@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 07:14:41 GMT, "Yardpilot" <yardpilot@comcast.n
|
|
|
On 29 Oct 2003 03:08:44 GMT, solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote
>
>>Why is mental fitness to practice law different from mental fitness to
>practice accountancy, nursing, or auto repair?
>>
>
>"It may not be. I'd watch my
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
> fact, it is not generally SAID that the law is that a jury has the
> "right" to "decide the law" because it is generally the rule that the
> judge decides the law and instructs the jury and that the jury must
> ob
|
|
|
In article <a0133f8d.0310281724.6e59c832@posting.google.com>,
Magic Nose Goblin <magicnosegob@yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> wrote in message news:<tNedncNFlcePOgCiRVn-jA@comcast.com>...
>> "Magic Nose Goblin" <magicnosegob@yahoo.com
|
|
|
It's my understanding that a title can only be trademarked if it applies to
a series - i.e. "Complete Idiot's Guide" etc.
Does this apply to a series of audio CD's - such as "Sounds Of The Forest",
"Sounds Of The Forest" vol II, etc.?
How many con
|
|
|
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 02:48:32 GMT, none@nowhere.com (Larry) wrote:
>In article <1ltspvki1pg5hliqp9nk1im0t6tpg0c6qf@4ax.com>, Jon Beaver
><jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 05:55:03 GMT, none@nowhere.com (Larry) wrote:
>>
>>>In article
|
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:58:16 GMT, "Roger Schlafly"
<rogersc@mindspring.com> wrote:
>"Merlin" <mag@camelot.org> wrote
>> Jon gave his definition of "jury nullification" -- A jury rendering
>> a verdict in deliberate disobedience of the law. What el
|
|
|
I forgot to ask this ib the previos message. I am assuming that it has
to cost something do conduct a wire tap on a cell phone? Do they even
have to go to a judge to get one?
|
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:46:04 GMT, "Yardpilot" <yardpilot@comcast.net>
wrote:
>Let's say I'm on a jury. I vote to acquit. You, as the DA, decide I
>have engaged in jury nullification, and elect to go after me for this
>"illegal activity." Cite the law
|
|
|
"Merlin" <mag@camelot.org> wrote
> Jon gave his definition of "jury nullification" -- A jury rendering
> a verdict in deliberate disobedience of the law. What else could
> anyone be talking about? A verdict in conformance with law could
> hardly be
|
|
|
How easy is it for local police to get a wire tap on a cell phone? I
have friend who bought a couple of grams of coke from a someone and
is worried that maybe his or the guy he got the stuff from, phone may
be tapped? Can they just go ahead and tap so
|
|
|
In article <20031028045357.06789.00000176@mb-m16.aol.com>,
solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote:
>Yardpilot wrote
>>> This isn't a criminal proceeding.
>"I'm quite aware of that. Did you read what I actually said, or just jump right
>to spin mo
|
|
|
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 03:59:38 GMT, mag@camelot.org (Merlin) wrote:
>Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:50:58 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net>
>>wrote:
>>> You made this debate personal -- and now, you're paying th
|
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:26:17 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net>
wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:50:58 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net>
>> wrote:
>> > You made this debate personal -- and now, you're paying the
|
|
|
In article <3F9DEEA6.617CA006@concentric.net>,
Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote:
>"Theodore A. Kaldis" wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>> > Try reading Tattered Cover. Or Bivens. The injury to an applicant's
>> > rights occurs the moment the
|
|
|
"Merlin" <mag@camelot.org> wrote
> Incidentally, I've noted that you've defamed me
> several times in posts, to my grave injury, which you know
> you shouldn't do, and was wondering whether you were
> trying see whether I would do something about it.
|
|
|
"Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> wrote
> In the Laura Kriho case, they were reduced to trying to use a contempt of
> court for not volunteering answers to unasked questions- it was hilarious,
Kriho was the exception that proves the rule. No other juror
|
|
|
"Larry" <none@nowhere.com> wrote
> >And they're lawyers when they're judges; lawyers when they're
legislators;
> >lawyers when they're sportscasters or oil consultants or managing the
family
> >affairs.
> So then how does a "lawyer" become a "non-la
|
|
|
"Ellen Mercer" <EllenAMercer@aol.com> wrote
> And the story about flashing people at a bar in Canada while Kobe
> appeared at the hearing to answer her rape charges? If that is even
> 10% of the true story, that would be pathological in the extreme.
|
|
|
"AH#49" <"AssholeT#49"@ your.net> wrote in message
news:TVvnb.3859$78.1258225@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> Jon Beaver wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 05:35:24 GMT, "Yardpilot" <yardpilot@comcast.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >"Jon Beaver" <jb
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
news:3q1tpvsusedqf4n7grb5e3093c25liggvr@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 05:35:24 GMT, "Yardpilot" <yardpilot@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
> >news:5es
|
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote
> You have knowledge that he didn't just have a civil wedding? Please
> explain? The public wants to know.
He's big in the church; very publicly pious- goes with his Mom; all that.
Chas
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
news:gf2tpv452kkec0sc415sfheu398d3pfsv5@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 07:31:42 GMT, "Yardpilot" <yardpilot@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Merlin" <mag@camelot.org> wrote in message
> >news:3f9e05
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:3F9F05BE.71BFA74C@concentric.net...
> Larry Smith wrote:
>
> > "Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
> > news:0h5tpvcqfvm08d00qg7rj1lu1qvcom7q00@4ax.com...
> > > On Tue, 28 Oct 2
|
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message
news:IY5296KW37922.3672222222@Gilgamesh-frog.org...
> WHY couldn't HItler have kept the OVENS on a little longer?
>
> ROAST JEW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> I HATE JEWS
Yet another pathe
|
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message
news:XIPU53ZK37922.3399189815@Gilgamesh-frog.org...
> WHY couldn't HItler have kept the OVENS on a little longer?
>
> ROAST JEW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> I HATE JEWS
Yet another pathetic
|
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message
news:ZXYD3T2737922.3359722222@Gilgamesh-frog.org...
> WHY couldn't HItler have kept the OVENS on a little longer?
>
> ROAST JEW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> I HATE JEWS
Yet another pathe
|
|
|
"Rocker" <terry75115@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f4c2f522.0310281111.31bf8dd2@posting.google.com...
> I can't seem to find anyone who knows what the law is in Texas for a
> murder.
> I was told that in Texas your only tried for the death penalt
|
|
|
"Jasbird" <Jasbird#dead-mail-box#@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:jqcspv84u87eb4nbgoiqsne30hu58ak8b8@4ax.com...
> If you're going to keep starting new threads to discuss the same topic
> then can you please stop posting this to news:talk.politic
|
|
|
"Cate" <orson14850invalid@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bnmug3$13hd33$1@ID-137534.news.uni-berlin.de...
> "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message
> news:bnmuma$9a7$4@stan.redhat.com...
> > Cate wrote:
>
> > > I'm pointing out, ac
|
|
|
"Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> wrote in message
news:BoudnW-XdaIMnQKiRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
> "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote
> > Hey, *you're* the one talking about "the statutory crime
> > of adultery". If anyone's advocating a return
|
|
|
"Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> wrote in message
news:h6SdnSnXl4dNZwOiRVn-uw@comcast.com...
> "tinydancer" <tinydancer@nospam.com> wrote
> > > > Waiting to hear 'harlot' somewhere in here.......... ;)
> > > Brazen hussy <g>
> > Strumpet ;)
>
>
|
|
|
"Cate" <orson14850invalid@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bnbteg$v4okb$1@ID-137534.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> "KM" <kthynnyl@com.com> wrote in message
> news:bnbsvg$vv6k4$1@ID-203179.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > x-no-archive: yes
> >
> > "Cate" <orson14
|
|
|
>> "Chas" <chas@chasclements.com> wrote in message
>> news:BoudnW-XdaIMnQKiRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>>
>>> "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote
>>>
>>>> Hey, *you're* the one talking about "the statutory crime
>>>> of adultery". If anyone's adv
|
|
|
"Magic Nose Goblin" <magicnosegob@yahoo.com> wrote
> The jury doesn't have to believe a single word the defence says to acquit.
> If the PROSECUTION does not have a credible case, then the defence could
> be as simple as "HA!" and still win.
Cling t
|
