|
|
| |
| |
kenpangborn@aol.com (Kenpangborn) wrote in message news:<20031204224851.11235.00000142@mb-m11.aol.com>... From: robgautier@DCEmail.com (Robert Gautier) Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, soc.men, alt.atheism, fl.general, alt.true-crime
((David Dennis Moore)) NOPE. Say Davey, did you get the photo from Cuba??
You are a liar Pangborn. You don't know my address so if you had been in Cuba you never would have been able to send me a picture from there. http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com proves you are a liar. You have never been to Cuba.
|
| |
| |
From: robgautier@DCEmail.com (Robert Gautier) Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, soc.culture.cuba, alt.psychology, misc.legal
((David Dennis Moore said:)) Say Davey, did you get the photo from Cuba??
You are a liar Pangborn. You don't know my address so if you had been in
Cuba you never would have been able to send me a picture from there. Oh I see, so you deny the photo I sent you as a file attachment. I have made an offer to have one of the participants here on the Cuba newsgroup vouch for photos of mer IN Cuba with my family and a scan of my boaring pass for the flight to Cuba. Ball is in your court, would THAT be acceptable PROOF that I went? I have asked him to destroy the photo and not circulate it because I **KNOW* that you would contact the authorities in the Castro goverment in an effort to cause them as much HARM as you could! But if one of the participants here vouches for it will you STFU and leave here???
You have never been to Cuba.
WLL DAVEY?? Bluff called! ========================= On several newsgroups that Mr. Moore is obsessed with crossposting his many psychotic claims, he has had several different positions on the facts. On one he claims he never fot a JPEG file I sent to him because I don't know his "REAL" address (Interesting admission for a man of so many ID's on Usenet) On other hje ANGRILY claims that the photo doesn't prove that I was there or that I took the photo. So I have come back to counter Moore on the CUBA newsgroup to offer to have a LONG TERM USER there who is from Cuba originally, see the photo of me IN Cuba and a scan of my boarding pass? Will the PSYCHOTIC DAVID MOORE accept that proof and leave the people in the Cuba newsgroup alone? Okay folks place your bets!
|
| |
| |
<< Subject: Re: Moore claims re.. my trip to Cuba From: kenpangborn@aol.com (Kenpangborn) Date: Sat, Dec 6, 2003 08:11 AM Message-id: <20031206111148.15352.00000314@mb-m03.aol.com>
From: robgautier@DCEmail.com (Robert Gautier) Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, soc.culture.cuba, alt.psychology, misc.legal
((David Dennis Moore said:)) Say Davey, did you get the photo from Cuba??
You are a liar Pangborn. You don't know my address so if you had been in
Cuba you never would have been able to send me a picture from there. Oh I see, so you deny the photo I sent you as a file attachment. I have made an offer to have one of the participants here on the Cuba newsgroup vouch for photos of mer IN Cuba with my family and a scan of my boaring pass for the flight to Cuba. Ball is in your court, would THAT be acceptable PROOF that I went? I have asked him to destroy the photo and not circulate it because I **KNOW* that you would contact the authorities in the Castro goverment in an effort to cause them as much HARM as you could! But if one of the participants here vouches for it will you STFU and leave here???
You have never been to Cuba.
WLL DAVEY?? Bluff called! ========================= On several newsgroups that Mr. Moore is obsessed with crossposting his many psychotic claims, he has had several different positions on the facts. On one he claims he never fot a JPEG file I sent to him because I don't know his "REAL" address (Interesting admission for a man of so many ID's on Usenet) On other hje ANGRILY claims that the photo doesn't prove that I was there or that I took the photo. So I have come back to counter Moore on the CUBA newsgroup to offer to have a LONG TERM USER there who is from Cuba originally, see the photo of me IN Cuba and a scan of my boarding pass? Will the PSYCHOTIC DAVID MOORE accept that proof and leave the people in the Cuba newsgroup alone? Okay folks place your bets! FRANKLY SPEAKING: My bet is that your case would fall apart in a court of law. Any of the new digital cameras allow you to manipulate the subjects in a very convincing manner. For my last birthday my wife used my new Sony digital to put me in the middle of a picture where I was surrounded by strippers, (one particularly volumputious one licking my ear). It is so simple to doctor photos and documents that using the photo that you descirbed or a scanned boarding pass as evidence that you were in a certain place at a certain time instead of using the real thing draws suspicion on you especially if you email it from your computer where it could have been doctored. This is what con artists do every day. Can I ask why you posted in misc.legal? Doesn't it belong in the Cuba ng? FRANK
|
| |
| |
Don't trade with Cuba petition: http://www.xld.com/public/cuba/SOLUTIONS/corpus.htm Lillian http://xld.com/public/cuba/cuba.htm --------------------------
kenpangborn@aol.com (Kenpangborn) wrote in message
news:<20031204224851.11235.00000142@mb-m11.aol.com>... From: robgautier@DCEmail.com (Robert Gautier) Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, soc.men, alt.atheism, fl.general, alt.true-crime ((David Dennis Moore)) It isn't just a claim Pangborn. You did make the "Disgrace to all Mankind" post. Then you nuked it. NOPE. Say Davey, did you get the photo from Cuba??
You are a liar Pangborn. You don't know my address so if you had been in Cuba you never would have been able to send me a picture from there. http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com proves you are a liar. You have never been to Cuba.
|
| |
| |
franklyspeaks@aol.com (Frankly Speaks) wrote in message news:<20031206174623.11786.00000268@mb-m25.aol.com>...
<< Subject: Re: Moore claims re.. my trip to Cuba From: kenpangborn@aol.com (Kenpangborn) Date: Sat, Dec 6, 2003 08:11 AM Message-id: <20031206111148.15352.00000314@mb-m03.aol.com> ((David Dennis Moore said:)) Say Davey, did you get the photo from Cuba?? Cuba you never would have been able to send me a picture from there. Oh I see, so you deny the photo I sent you as a file attachment. I have made an offer to have one of the participants here on the Cuba newsgroup vouch for photos of mer IN Cuba with my family and a scan of my boaring pass for the flight to Cuba. Ball is in your court, would THAT be acceptable PROOF that I went? I have asked him to destroy the photo and not circulate it because I **KNOW* that you would contact the authorities in the Castro goverment in an effort to cause them as much HARM as you could! But if one of the participants here vouches for it will you STFU and leave here??? WLL DAVEY?? Bluff called! ========================= On several newsgroups that Mr. Moore is obsessed with crossposting his many psychotic claims, he has had several different positions on the facts. On one he claims he never fot a JPEG file I sent to him because I don't know his "REAL" address (Interesting admission for a man of so many ID's on Usenet) On other hje ANGRILY claims that the photo doesn't prove that I was there or that I took the photo. So I have come back to counter Moore on the CUBA newsgroup to offer to have a LONG TERM USER there who is from Cuba originally, see the photo of me IN Cuba and a scan of my boarding pass? Will the PSYCHOTIC DAVID MOORE accept that proof and leave the people in the Cuba newsgroup alone? Okay folks place your bets! FRANKLY SPEAKING: My bet is that your case would fall apart in a court of law. Any of the new digital cameras allow you to manipulate the subjects in a very convincing manner. For my last birthday my wife used my new Sony digital to put me in the middle of a picture where I was surrounded by strippers, (one particularly volumputious one licking my ear). It is so simple to doctor photos and documents that using the photo that you descirbed or a scanned boarding pass as evidence that you were in a certain place at a certain time instead of using the real thing draws suspicion on you especially if you email it from your computer where it could have been doctored. This is what con artists do every day. Can I ask why you posted in misc.legal? Doesn't it belong in the Cuba ng? FRANK
They say that at one time he claimed to be a lawyer but no one woul believe him. http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com might have something about it. We also found this link where Pangborn used child rape as a witticism http://www.argate.net/~liz/fathers/ and he also got elected KOOK of the Month http://www.lart.com/auk/whiners.html.
|
| |
| |
From: franklyspeaks@aol.com (Frankly Speaks) Newsgroups: misc.legal
FRANKLY SPEAKING: My bet is that your case would fall apart in a court of law. Any of the new digital cameras allow you to manipulate the subjects in a very convincing manner. But easily detectible.
For my last birthday my wife used my new Sony digital to put me in the
middle of a picture where I was surrounded by strippers, (one particularly volumputious one licking my ear). It is so simple to doctor photos and documents that using the photo that you descirbed or a scanned boarding pass as evidence that you were in a certain place at a certain time instead of using the real thing draws suspicion on you especially if you email it from your computer where it could have been doctored. So PLEASE tell me just WHAT is the "REAL THING" on Usenet? If NOTHING posted counts, what is the "REAL THING?"
This is what con artists do every day. Can I ask why you posted in
misc.legal? Doesn't belong in the Cuba ng? FRANK Well you will have to ask Mr. Moore who is OBSESSED with crosposting. Note that AOL software does NOT PERMIT corsposting to more than one newsgroup at a time as our resident vandal's does. I am VER interested in what your concept of this "REAL THING" is and how one gets it onto newssgroups? I find that concept amazing since you claim that anything can be doctored. NOW, as to YOUR situation, it seems your lawyer may have fallen down a little bit by not doing discovery to see what evidence was coming, not consulting you on it, and not having the doctored photo examined. When a photo is examined you can detect altered pixels. Moorer considers himself to he America's GREATES expert on Photoshop, and it has been, along with Lotus, the mainstay of his computer (IT) consulting business that just went bankrupt November of 2002. Yes photos CAN be altered, but you can see it even in Photosop. These have NOT been altered. Moore is a compulsive LIAR!
|
| |
| |
kenpangborn@aol.com (Kenpangborn) wrote in message From: franklyspeaks@aol.com (Frankly Speaks)
FRANKLY SPEAKING: My bet is that your case would fall apart in a court of law. Any of the new digital cameras allow you to manipulate the subjects in a very convincing manner. But easily detectible.
It would depend on the skill of the person doing the altering. What a putrid waste of a puny penis you are. For my last birthday my wife used my new Sony digital to put me in the
middle of a picture where I was surrounded by strippers, (one particularly volumputious one licking my ear). It is so simple to doctor photos and documents that using the photo that you descirbed or a scanned boarding pass as evidence that you were in a certain place at a certain time instead of using the real thing draws suspicion on you especially if you email it from your computer where it could have been doctored. So PLEASE tell me just WHAT is the "REAL THING" on Usenet? If NOTHING posted counts, what is the "REAL THING?"
You should face legal action for your attempt to impersonate a man, you ridiculous little mascara face-painted Jerk-In-The-Box. Haven't you heard? Usenet has decided that you don't KNOW reality from fantasy.
misc.legal? Doesn't belong in the Cuba ng? FRANK Well you will have to ask Mr. Moore who is OBSESSED with crosposting.
He responded to YOUR post on misc.legal, you you nauseating assault on the senses. Note that
AOL software does NOT PERMIT corsposting to more than one newsgroup at a time as our resident vandal's does.
He responded to YOUR post that YOU made Pangborn. Shut up before someone gets enough of your lame lying and sticks a red flag up your ass and throws you into a bull ring with a herd of cloned bulls genetically altered to ramrod gimps
I am VER interested in what your concept of this "REAL THING" is and how one gets it onto newssgroups? I find that concept amazing since you claim that anything can be doctored.
Your mental illness can't be doctored Pangborn.
NOW, as to YOUR situation, it seems your lawyer may have fallen down a little bit by not doing discovery to see what evidence was coming, not consulting you on it, and not having the doctored photo examined. When a photo is examined you can detect altered pixels. Moorer considers himself to he America's GREATES expert on Photoshop, and it has been, along with Lotus, the mainstay of his computer (IT) consulting business that just went bankrupt November of 2002. Yes photos CAN be altered, but you can see it even in Photosop. These have NOT been altered. Moore is a compulsive LIAR!
(Everyone on usenet looks around.........sees no pictures.......thinks Pangborn is crazier than ever..........)
|
| |
| |
kenpangborn@aol.com (Kenpangborn) wrote in message
Yes photos CAN be altered, but you can see it even in Photosop. These have NOT been altered.
"These" pictures have NOT been SEEN! You didn't go to Cuba.
|
| |
| |
Don't trade with Cuba petition: http://www.xld.com/public/cuba/SOLUTIONS/corpus.htm Lillian http://xld.com/public/cuba/cuba.htm
kenpangborn@aol.com (Kenpangborn) wrote in message "These" pictures have NOT been SEEN! You didn't go to Cuba.
|
| |
| |
|