|
|
Welcome to the NFL. They aren't judges. They weren't really appointed as
judges. They don't act like judges, nor are they considered by real judges
to be judges. They're administrative folk, revenue agents. Just don't speed
in a state with the death
|
|
|
"Bryan J. Maloney" <cavaggione@sbcglobal.nmungemungt> wrote in message news:<Xns944ECF78C10AEdogfaceinsightbbcom@206.141.193.32>...
> christopher.buyers@virgin.net (Christopher Buyers) nattered on
> thusnews:38e9db65.0312111049.7617c240@posting.google.c
|
|
|
"Pierre Aronax" <pierre_aronax@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3fd8d689$0$20783$79c14f64@nan-newsreader-02.noos.net>...
> "Christopher Buyers" <christopher.buyers@virgin.net> a écrit dans le message
> de news:38e9db65.0312111049.7617c240@posting.goo
|
|
|
It is more like showing up at the door out of the blue, and then expecting
to be let in.
Not just walking in.
And showing up for any reason, none at all would ever be considered an
emergency.
I thought there was a 24 hour notice law in CO.
|
|
|
"The Rifleman" <stevenospam@day273723.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bra4f7$4gr$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk...
>
> "Jackeroo" <Jackeroo@nospam.net.au> wrote in message
> news:RvZBb.48560$aT.25484@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> > Hi absolutely
|
|
|
Thanks for you help. I called and talked to the customer relations guy at
the dealership this morning, and he said he hadn't heard a thing about it.
He said he would check it out and get back to me. He called this afternoon
and they have all of a sud
|
|
|
"David Fabian" <david.m.fabian@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>"Robert Miller" <rmiller0100@comcast.net> wrote in message news:-MadndW4ZOZnBEWiRVn-uw@comcast.com...
>>
>> Today rationalism tries to make the opposite claim,
>> that God is irrational and shoul
|
|
|
"Christopher Buyers" <christopher.buyers@virgin.net> a écrit dans le message
de news:38e9db65.0312111049.7617c240@posting.google.com...
> yanbee2@yahoo.com (Yannis) wrote in message
news:<a75bea69.0312101019.39cc6aa0@posting.google.com>...
> > chris
|
|
|
"Robert Miller" <rmiller0100@comcast.net> wrote in message news:-MadndW4ZOZnBEWiRVn-uw@comcast.com...
>
> Today rationalism tries to make the opposite claim,
> that God is irrational and should be dismissed.
I find it difficult apply reasoning to th
|
|
|
>> 1. How long does a landlord have to "charge" an ex-tenant for damage? In CA
>I
>> know it's something like 21 days. Does anybody know what it is in TX? Does
>10
>> months sound insane to anyone else?
>
>I am a TX landlord and it doesn't sound i
|
|
|
n article <shnatvkd0md8rcm48nd3m2esnvpdr8jdp6@4ax.com>,
miguel <theleg@newsguy.com> wrote:
>kim wrote:
>>Steve Chaney wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 08:10:29 -0500, cbianco <medusa2@newsguy.com>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> here's a question for the studi
|
|
|
n article <3fdbbb3c.45657782@news.sf.sbcglobal.net>,
Steve Chaney, NR's Tormentor ® <gunhed57@NRismykicktoy.pacbell.net> wrote:
>In <4jc4tvgftskvu7kib8gjfptvha6vof1ivl@4ax.com>, kim
><kimonnetNOSPAM@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
>>On 6 Dec 2003 19:38:35 GMT, Joh
|
|
|
In article <8dt2tvgrj6je8jqi06ls4kg9vg8dm9rmeh@4ax.com>,
miguel <theleg@newsguy.com> wrote:
>"Charlotte L. Blackmer" <clb@rahul.net> wrote:
>
>>In article <us80tvoq5v5pvbjqbcher0b9i2kpv1241h@4ax.com>,
>>miguel <theleg@newsguy.com> wrote:
>>>cbianc
|
|
|
> Not necessarily. They don't have unfettered discretion to determine this
and
> they don't necessarily have the right to tow w/o notifying you first.
Also,
> did they see the car prior to your signing the lease or did you park the
car
> there for a
|
|
|
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:44:39 -0700, "Wizardlaw" <wizardlaw@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>The following US Supreme Court Petition for Certiorari was
>entirely researched and written by Robert A. Hirschfeld, JD,
and is pretty much gibberish.
Which is why it
|
|
|
"Dave M" <djm_gb@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I seem to detect that you have edited the text of the thread so that
> it only includes what you want to (or think you can) deal with.
No, I did not. These games of diversions and veiled insults don't
|
|
|
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:36:54 -0800, "McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com>
wrote:
>The only crime is trespass.
Or theft of services.
**Dan Evans
**I post information, not advice.
|
|
|
"Don Priebe" <priebe@iname.com> wrote in message
news:jNSBb.2589$JW3.2133@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > Need some advice.
>
> <long storty, bought car, dealer provided insurance, but really didn't,
> multi-car accident, everybody pointing fingers,...
|
|
|
araMind Brainstorming Software will give you a free copy of its legal
brainstorming program, for a limited time, in response for feedback.
After you get your program, you will have one week to respond to us
with comments. When you respond, you wll get
|
|
|
Dxer410! wrote:
> It is more like showing up at the door out of the blue, and then
> expecting to be let in.
> Not just walking in.
> And showing up for any reason, none at all would ever be considered an
> emergency.
> I thought th
|
|
|
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:39:31 GMT, "David Fabian"
<david.m.fabian@sbcglobal.net>
>"Ripley7173" <ripley7173@aol.com> wrote in message news:20031210230911.13641.00000570@mb-m10.aol.com...
>> 1. How long does a landlord have to "charge" an ex-tenant for
|
|
|
Scott <golden@uslink.net> wrote in message news:<3FD8B155.CE26F284@uslink.net>...
> The daughter of a friend of ours bought a home that had been
> remodelled by the boyfriend of the realtor. (he buys houses,
> remodels them, and his girlfriend sells t
|
|
|
A few years ago, I paid $20,000 for 20% interest in a small corporation that
a friend of mine owns and runs. My friend kept the remaining 80%. Now I
would like to sell my shares back to the corporation for what I paid for
them. My friend agrees and
|
|
|
"Ripley7173" <ripley7173@aol.com> wrote in message news:20031210230911.13641.00000570@mb-m10.aol.com...
> 1. How long does a landlord have to "charge" an ex-tenant for damage? In CA I
> know it's something like 21 days. Does anybody know what it is in T
|
|
|
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:36:54 -0800, "McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> said:
>You would
>be instantly suspected of being a drug peddler.
Well that's stupid. If they're gonna nail someone, it should at least be
on a basis that's grounded in truth instead
|
|
|
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:16:50 -0500, "Robert Miller"
<rmiller0100@comcast.net> wrote:
> ... None of the four wars in my lifetime came about
> because we were too strong. It is weakness ... that
> invites adventurous adversaries to make mistaken
> ju
|
|
|
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:32:37 -0800, Robert Broughton
<rbronews@brou8ghton.ca> wrote:
>stan-LEE 98 wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:34:16 GMT, "PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Workers are not children, they don't nee
|
|
|
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:36:33 -0800, Robert Broughton
<rbronews@brou8ghton.ca> wrote:
>Bob Broughton
>http://broughton.ca/
>Vancouver, BC, Canada
>"Watch your mouth, if you ever want to cross the border. Bad things
>can happen to Canadians who use
|
|
|
"michael" <deadboyart@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b76d774e.0312102333.4f5ea69@posting.google.com...
> "Zen Cohen" <aturny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<mSfzb.91030$Vs1.45015@twister.austin.rr.com>...
> > "michael" <deadboyart@yahoo.com> w
|
|
|
mickeycgriffith@cox.net (Mickey) wrote in message news:<654bb765.0312110925.16ad138@posting.google.com>...
> This seems like a simple question, but can an employer ask an employee
> for a specific reason on a sick call? For example, if you call in
> s
|
|
|
Does anyone know of a law in Colo. that has something to do with a landlord
being able to just show up at the house without first giving a 24 hour notice
unless it is a real emergency.
I could have sworn there was an actual state statute concerning t
|
|
|
dxer410@aol.com (Dxer410) wrote in message news:<20031211111931.14167.00000692@mb-m28.aol.com>...
> Does anyone know of a law in Colo. that has something to do with a landlord
> being able to just show up at the house without first giving a 24 hour noti
|
|
|
stanlee_98@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:36:33 -0800, Robert Broughton
> <rbronews@brou8ghton.ca> wrote:
>
>>Bob Broughton
>>http://broughton.ca/
>>Vancouver, BC, Canada
>>"Watch your mouth, if you ever want to cross the border. Bad
|
|
|
stan-LEE 98 wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:32:37 -0800, Robert Broughton
> <rbronews@brou8ghton.ca> wrote:
>
>>stan-LEE 98 wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:34:16 GMT, "PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Work
|
|
|
"s_knight8" <s_knight8@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6bd12cd6.0312090809.19114b29@posting.google.com...
>
http://www.vaildaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20031208/NEWS/312080104
>
>
> "The judge can limit the scope of what inf
|
|
|
Mickey! wrote:
> This seems like a simple question, but can an employer ask an employee
> for a specific reason on a sick call? For example, if you call in
> sick, can I ask you 'what's wrong?' (flu, stomach, etc.)
> Or, would you be justifie
|
|
|
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in
news:3FD61292.2C18FF91@sprintmail.com:
> Not Me wrote:
>
>
>> Why would it not be Constitutional. There's no provision that says "No
>> one shall be forced to rat out another person who com
|
|
|
"Bryan J. Maloney" <cavaggione@sbcglobal.nmungemungt> a écrit dans le
message de news:Xns944E4F02AD517dogfaceinsightbbcom@206.141.193.32...
> yanbee2@yahoo.com (Yannis) nattered on
> thusnews:a75bea69.0312102356.1ec52d2c@posting.google.com:
>
> > D
|
|
|
Alun wrote:
>
> I would think that you have a right to not identify the driver, but then
> they will fine you.
True. But it's a no-points infraction.
> It's probably cheaper at that point to pay the fine
> than to challenge it.
But it's
|
|
|
Robert Miller wrote:
> We are not going by the 1800's definition of Dollar. The Silver Libertys
> are 1 troy oz. of .999 fine silver. They have a face value of $10.
And isn't the spot value of silver about $4 per oz.?
|
|
|
est in Paradise,
I have some "inside" info for you on that Rapoza case...Paris Hilton
is making a monetary contribution to Eddie's defense fund...Psych, but
it would be nice! You know allegedly he was under the influence of
methamphetamines at the
|
|
|
I changed the subject line so it would fit.
--
Christopher A. Young
Learn More about Jesus
www.lds.org
www.mormons.com
"JaBrIoL" <Jabriol@excite.com> wrote in message
news:d222de3e.0311240701.666be8b5@posting.google.com...
The Amis
|
|
|
yanbee2@yahoo.com (Yannis) nattered on
thusnews:a75bea69.0312102356.1ec52d2c@posting.google.com:
> Don Aitken <don-aitken@freeuk.com> wrote in message in this respect.
>>
>> How many generations does Greek citizenship go, for those living
>> abro
|
|
|
Break the law for 18 months and get a life time pension with medical coverage.
Social Security checks could go south of border
Sergio Bustos
Gannett News Service
Dec. 10, 2003 12:01 AM
Related link
• Special report: Border security >>
|
|
|
The daughter of a friend of ours bought a home that had been
remodelled by the boyfriend of the realtor. (he buys houses,
remodels them, and his girlfriend sells them). The disclosure
form stated that "everything is in working order". There was no
h
|
|
|
he following US Supreme Court Petition for Certiorari was
entirely researched and written by Robert A. Hirschfeld, JD,
on behalf of the self-representing Petitioner, Carnell Smith.
It is Hirschfeld's eleventh Supreme Court Petition. His
prior US Supre
|
|
|
Dxer410! wrote:
> Does anyone know of a law in Colo. that has something to do with a
> landlord being able to just show up at the house without first giving a
> 24 hour notice unless it is a real emergency.
> I could have sworn there was an
|
|
|
"David Fabian" <david.m.fabian@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:gqVBb.599$DI.592@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com...
> "Robert Miller" <rmiller0100@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:VMmdnfWe-9wAyUqi4p2dnA@comcast.com...
> > Is David Fabian your real na
|
|
|
yanbee2@yahoo.com (Yannis) wrote in message news:<a75bea69.0312101019.39cc6aa0@posting.google.com>...
> christopher.buyers@virgin.net (Christopher Buyers) wrote in message news:<38e9db65.0312092324.7df17715@posting.google.com>...
I will not answer every
|
|
|
This seems like a simple question, but can an employer ask an employee
for a specific reason on a sick call? For example, if you call in
sick, can I ask you 'what's wrong?' (flu, stomach, etc.)
Or, would you be justified to say, "I'd rather not say"
|
