|
|
Bob Erwin wrote:
> Hello,
> I just got out of a bench trial, in which I *know* the officier was
> lying based on evidence from a car manufacturer that I was not allowed
> to submit as evidence.
> The Car information was from the actual Sub
|
|
|
Lehar V. Osvald wrote:
> I posted a message about this earlier this year. To recap, I'm an
> American expatriate who has no residence in the US, thus no state that
> I consider my home. I want to change my name, and some people who
> replied sai
|
|
|
Elephant Ele wrote:
> does anybody know how driver license is managed across different
> jurisdictins? i.e.,
> if a guy gets DL from cali., then he moves to florida, he applies for
> Florida license with his california DL, by surrendering his
|
|
|
>From: berwin@msbob.com (Bob Erwin)
>
>Hello,
>
>I just got out of a bench trial, in which I *know* the officier was
>lying based on evidence from a car manufacturer that I was not allowed
>to submit as evidence.
>
>The Car information was from
|
|
|
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=1687168
Bryant's lawyers argued that evidence collected during a search of
Bryant's hotel room should be thrown out because investigators did not
tell him they had a warrant.
The defense said the T-shirt
|
|
|
>OK, I've decided to represent myself in court.
>
>I will be filing suit against the retailer for slander and false arrest.
>
>Questions:
>
>1) Should I file just before Christmas, so to improve chances of a default
>judgement?
No one's going t
|
|
|
truckinsp@aol.com (Truckinsp) wrote in message news:<20031215180808.01860.00000987@mb-m18.aol.com>...
> >From: berwin@msbob.com (Bob Erwin)
>
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >I just got out of a bench trial, in which I *know* the officier was
> >lying based
|
|
|
On 15 Dec 2003 13:03:12 -0800, Bob Erwin <berwin@msbob.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just got out of a bench trial, in which I *know* the officier was
> lying based on evidence from a car manufacturer that I was not allowed
> to submit as evidence.
>
|
|
|
Some quotes from the motions.
"If the defendant intends to present any evidence of false reporting of
sexual assaults by the victim, then the prosecution requests that the
defendant comply with the procedures set forth"
"Mr. Bryant's Offer of Proo
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 06:38:37 -0500, Moonbug <Moonbug@NotSure.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 18:44:05 -0700, Uncle Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:15:54 +0000, rumik <rumik@sympatico.ca>
|
|
|
Moonbug wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 18:44:05 -0700, Uncle Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
>
>
>>On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:15:54 +0000, rumik <rumik@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>stanlee_98@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:04:16 -
|
|
|
Moonbug wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:13:48 +0000, rumik <rumik@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>
>>Moonbug wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:04:16 -0800, Robert Broughton
>>><rbronews@brou8ghton.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Robert Broughton wrote
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:15:54 +0000, rumik <rumik@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>
>>stanlee_98@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:04:16 -0800, Robert Broughton
>>><rbronews@brou8ghton.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060303050606050704020108
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Robert Miller wrote:
> The $100 FRN
>this year will likely lose 3%
|
|
|
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:08:11 +0000, Tam <tamsuraiya@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Possible in principle if the judge finds you more credible than the tenant.
> I've seen it happen where the company alleges that it is their policy that
> no customer can do busines
|
|
|
"s_knight8" <s_knight8@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6bd12cd6.0312151827.3c5ca0e@posting.google.com...
> defense also states that Kobe was immobile due to the surgery..
Maybe that's the real reason the victim is pissed, KB just laid there & ma
|
|
|
On 15/12/03 17:21, in article 20031215122151.08176.00000941@mb-m16.aol.com,
"Waitumminsir" <waitumminsir@aol.com> wrote:
>
> How do I go about subpoenaing the security tape? What are the likelihood it
> was
> erased? Btw, this was a major retailer
|
|
|
On 15/12/03 15:51, in article brklhg012vi@enews2.newsguy.com, "Ted Kerin"
<tf.kerin@gte.net> wrote:
>
> "Bob Stock" <xxx@x.com> wrote in message
> news:5p3ptvk0a58o4vn3v9fv1au1kb5b7i5g1h@4ax.com...
>> On 14 Dec 2003 16:16:26 GMT, waitumminsir@aol.
|
|
|
Possible in principle if the judge finds you more credible than the tenant.
I've seen it happen where the company alleges that it is their policy that
no customer can do business with them without signing the standard contract,
and that it's impossible
|
|
|
It's more common in industry than in university because academics have to
publish, and what they publish is often a re-hash of their PhD dissertation.
My PhD mentor told me that his department had thrown out a student who had
been found to have plagi
|
|
|
napgirl wrote:
> Unfortunately, I've been very disorganized and can not find my copy of
> the original lease. My tennants have been consistently late on rent
> for several months and are now determined to use their security
> deposit for their l
|
|
|
Baghdad Bob <Baghdadbob> wrote in message news:<6ba10fb1683f315dbd56dd0f53ed75e4@news.teranews.com>...
> robgautier@DCEmail.com (Robert Gautier) wrote in
> news:e45fbc08.0312141151.57b5528c@posting.google.com:
>
> > Bush spoke to the nation more tha
|
|
|
Defendant's Motion to Submit Juror Questionaire
http://www.courts.state.co.us/exec/...motn_submit.pdf
Defendant's Motion for Expanded Voir Dire
http://www.courts.state.co.us/exec/...or_expanded.pdf
Motion for Evidentiary Hearing Pursuant to C.R.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:01:05 GMT, Alan Bell <alanbno2spam@blk.com> wrote:
>
> My guess is that the manufacturer could sue the auctioneer for selling a
> machine he didn't have the right to sell and try to get the machine back. I
> could then sue the
|
|
|
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FDE2271.3CF153FB@sprintmail.com...
> Robert Miller wrote:
>
> > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:3FDA11BF.52D12D69@sprintmail.com...
> > > Ro
|
|
|
>Had an individual arrested you; detained you for forty minutes by force,
I wasn't physically forced but they did surround me. I could be wrong but
doesn't false imprisonment also cover implied?
>moved you from one area to another, attempted
|
|
|
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:07:50 +0000, rumik <rumik@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:15:54 +0000, rumik <rumik@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>stanlee_98@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:04:16 -
|
|
|
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:13:33 +0000, rumik <rumik@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 06:38:37 -0500, Moonbug <Moonbug@NotSure.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 18:44:05 -0700, Uncle Samuel <stars@bars> w
|
|
|
>1. If you ask substantial damages, you will be dealing with an insurance
>company and not a retailer. The insurance company will probably be quick to
>settle for a modest sum with a lawyer, but perhaps not so quick to settle
>with a someone representi
|
|
|
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:37:27 -0700, Chas <c.clementsPAM@comcast.net> wrote:
> "Isaac" <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote
>> Judges are hostile to pro pers because unrepresented litigants make so
> many
>> mistakes that the judge's life is made into
|
|
|
>I am assuming a charge of shoplifting or other failure to pay for an
>item owned by the store. You (and/or other responders) can correct me
>if I am wrong.
>
>Having known people who worked retail store security, cases brought
>under these situati
|
|
|
I posted a message about this earlier this year. To recap, I'm an
American expatriate who has no residence in the US, thus no state that
I consider my home. I want to change my name, and some people who
replied said that I would have to do it in the co
|
|
|
"Waitumminsir" <waitumminsir@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031215122928.08176.00000942@mb-m16.aol.com...
> >Had an individual arrested you; detained you for forty minutes by force,
>
> I wasn't physically forced but they did surround me. I could
|
|
|
"Tam" <tamsuraiya@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:BC03C57C.32B5%tamsuraiya@yahoo.ca...
> On 15/12/03 15:51, in article brklhg012vi@enews2.newsguy.com, "Ted Kerin"
> <tf.kerin@gte.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Bob Stock" <xxx@x.com> wrote in message
> >
|
|
|
veh@nomail.com wrote:
>
> yes. Certainly, dealers keep better track of selling and buying prices than
> do their customers. I think the dealer got a good profit. Hopefully buyer
> will enjoy the product. :-/
>
Sounds like the buyer allowe
|
|
|
Two months ago, I bought a copier at a physical public auction (not eBay)
for $500 which is worth maybe $2000 or $3000. The company had gone belly up.
I called the manufacturer for parts and was told that the machine was on
lease and should not have be
|
|
|
First, all the greedy lawyers have to bleed the settlement dry. Then,
you will get a tiny fraction of your losses, maybe enough for you to
buy a little beer to cry in.-Jitney
|
|
|
"cyber" <georgekspam@humboldt1.com> wrote in message
news:georgekspam-03CFEA.17352814122003@corp.supernews.com...
> we made an offer on a home , but contingent on the tenants leaving before
> we could close. And they show no intent to move. They have
|
|
|
"Alan Bell" <alanbno2spam@blk.com> wrote in message
news:5VkDb.399990$ao4.1315471@attbi_s51...
> Two months ago, I bought a copier at a physical public auction (not eBay)
> for $500 which is worth maybe $2000 or $3000. The company had gone belly
up.
|
|
|
<veh@nomail.com> wrote:
>I thought there are various "cooling
>off" periods that are legally required for various legal dealings
I believe that there are cooling-off periods in some states. I also
believe that in California, the subject state, the
|
|
|
<stanlee_98@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:lnfqtv46mii1p4fnum3fu6bbtbvg0j541n@4ax.com...
> You're an idiot if you think authors don't have a saying in where
> their work is published. If you copy a newspaper article without
> permission, and post
|
|
|
In article <3FDDF069.2050909@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Dave M wrote:
>> tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<brcgf6$c4p@rac2.wam.umd.edu>...
>>
>>>In article <3FD75B95.80801@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com
|
|
|
In article <27fce6dd.0312150558.7ecf8404@posting.google.com>,
Dave M <djm_gb@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<brcgf6$c4p@rac2.wam.umd.edu>...
>> In article <3FD75B95.80801@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wr
|
|
|
In Florida, right of rescission is only for goods delivered to your home.
Not vehicles and such.
Recently we did a refinance where they did the closing in my home and I had
a 3 day right of rescission.
Something you might look for is a breach of c
|
|
|
Robert Miller wrote:
> "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3FDA11BF.52D12D69@sprintmail.com...
> > Robert Miller wrote:
> >
> > > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:3FD8EC79.
|
|
|
Hello,
I just got out of a bench trial, in which I *know* the officier was
lying based on evidence from a car manufacturer that I was not allowed
to submit as evidence.
The Car information was from the actual Subaru Web site and was
printed direc
|
|
|
stanlee_98@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 05:15:54 GMT, "PRSmith"
> <prsmith@houston.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>>>> Bobo, you're late with the royalty payments.
>>>>> In case you're not familiar with copyright laws,
>>>>> you can be fined $100,0
|
|
|
OK enough!
Send it to the insurance company and deal with it.
You spent thousands on a house with one smoke detector and an alarm the
rings logical only.
|
|
|
"Najena" <najena@coldmail.com> wrote
> How risking mistakes that cause you to both lose the case AND have
> sanctions awarded against you?
His case, as stated, isn't frivolous.
If he made a habit of wasting the Court's time, pointlessly, he might ha
|
|
