|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Oh man that is awesome.
In an Islamic culture I can get laid all I want with no consequence!
Logos <angel@heaven.com> wrote:
>In muslim societies, having sex outside the marriage is illegal. So,
>if a girl den
|
|
|
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> Terry Hatchett@altopia.net the abusive ISP <thatchett@rotangoprep.org> wrote in message news:<bsq77s$ip5$0@pita.alt.net>...
>
....
>
>
>>>>>>It's already so small the company car is a tricycle.
>
>
>
>>>>>Clo
|
|
|
On 29 Dec 2003 19:48:23 -0800, in alt.astrology, alchameth2@yahoo.com
(Edmond Wollmann) wrote:
>Terry Hatchett@altopia.net the abusive ISP <thatchett@rotangoprep.org> wrote in message news:<bsq77s$ip5$0@pita.alt.net>...
>
>> I can drive across my 5
|
|
|
In article <bspol00td3@enews1.newsguy.com> "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> writes:
> Lee Hollaar wrote:
>
> > In article <bsoep002qfj@enews1.newsguy.com> "Richard" <anonymous@127.000>
> > writes:
> >>Question, when was it written?
>
> > "The letter i
|
|
|
Robert Lee <cranchingwire@piddlydiddlydoo.earthlink.net> wrote in
news:Xns946077A191B50cheezycreezy@207.217.77.203:
> It's my business whether I abuse the stuff or not, and I'm
> sick of doctors insisting on giving me Tylenol 3
Whoops, not even
|
|
|
Terry Hatchett@altopia.net the abusive ISP <thatchett@rotangoprep.org> wrote in message news:<bsq77s$ip5$0@pita.alt.net>...
> EHWollmann wrote:
> >>From: Terry Hatchett thatchett@altopia.net
> >>Message-ID: <bspolq$llf$0@pita.alt.net>
> >>Edm
|
|
|
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
http://www.nocem.org/
http://www.rahul.net/falk/quickrefs.html#W
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
@@BEGIN NCM HEADERS
Version: 0.9
Issuer: wollmannizer@spam.free
Type: spew
Action: hide
Count: 1
Noti
|
|
|
AlephNull_42@yahoo.com (Aleph Null) wrote in
news:7a3d5c77.0312291105.7f5a1b27@posting.google.com:
> But it doesn't
> mean that a doctor would necessarily prescribe Zyprexa to an
> individual presenting with difficulties sleeping who had no other
|
|
|
MysticJohn@webtv.net (Grace M. John) wrote in message news:<11384-3FEF39A8-112@storefull-2311.public.lawson.webtv.net>...
> A woman from Pennsylvania, age sixty five, born in Poland and a U.S.
> citizen for over thirty five years, has no one and has a p
|
|
|
----------------------------- <^> <(·¿·)> <^> -----------------------------
"Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote
> |-|erc wrote:
>
> >> Otherwise you are paranoid, or don't know who you are.
> >>
>
> > Strange article to have
>
> > INVEST
|
|
|
jonathan wrote:
> Does this applicable only for copyright that is registered within 3
> months of publication or before the infraction? Also, does lack of
> copyright warning will help the defendant in anyway?
> Sorry for keep asking this. I f
|
|
|
saylo1234@aol.com (LovingPerson) wrote in message news:<fed77941.0312280959.724780a6@posting.google.com>...
> Interesting point. Well put.
>
> I will take it into consideration the next time I drive fast.
>
> Certainly 74 isn't the same as 55 in
|
|
|
In article <k2hjuvolr3m1n5p7lrr40qm0dnma17b75e@4ax.com>,
Charlie Toohey <toohey@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>I've been reading the Nolo books on estate planning, and the examples given
>state that when a piece of property is transferred into a living trust,
|
|
|
>Subject: Re: I got a speeding ticket in fast lane only doing 74 mph
>From: Katherine Griffis-Greenberg egylist@griffis-consulting.com
>Date: 12/29/2003 1:51 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <i3rvuvcu6g0lt530urrr6djivl0iq6ugl5@4ax.com>
>
>"Mo
|
|
|
As an attorney, I am asked if students can be forced to recite the
pledge of allegiance and salute the flag in government schools.
In the 1930s, the National Socialist German Workers' Party passed laws
that required everyone to pledge allegiance, sim
|
|
|
"Robert Lee" <cranchingwire@piddlydiddlydoo.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Xns946077A191B50cheezycreezy@207.217.77.203...
> AlephNull_42@yahoo.com (Aleph Null) wrote in
> news:7a3d5c77.0312291105.7f5a1b27@posting.google.com:
>
> > But it doe
|
|
|
"Aleph Null" <AlephNull_42@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7a3d5c77.0312291105.7f5a1b27@posting.google.com...
> "tinydancer" <tinydancer@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:<yNwEb.14466$3k6.3688@bignews5.bellsouth.net>...
> >
> >
> > So there's you
|
|
|
Does this applicable only for copyright that is registered within 3
months of publication or before the infraction? Also, does lack of
copyright warning will help the defendant in anyway?
Sorry for keep asking this. I feel that I am not asking the qu
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Logos <angel@heaven.com> wrote:
>On 25 Dec 2003 13:15:22 -0800, horb@net.hr (crohawk) wrote:
>
>>Logos <angel@heaven.com> wrote in message news:<5ioluvsfb9f34lvbbn34fchaj4clm9bftp@4ax.com>...
>>> In muslim societi
|
|
|
----------------------------- <^> <(·¿·)> <^> -----------------------------
"Lee Hollaar" <hollaar@faith.cs.utah.edu> wrote in message
> In article <ytLHb.13198$WQ3.3467@lakeread05>
"Betty Boop" <bettyboop@gorgeous.as> writes:
> > I was sent a copy
|
|
|
>From: Katherine Griffis-Greenberg egylist@griffis-consulting.com
>
>Actually, I gave that URL earlier, which was
>
>http://www-ucs.usc.edu/~karl/MTN/npd.htm
>Narcissistic Personality Disorder
>DSM IV
You did, my mistake!
>
|
|
|
>From: saylo1234@aol.com (LovingPerson)
>
>Hey Kath:
LOLOLOL....loosing the "politeness" now aren't you?
>
>otherwise, I would not have survived the academic, nor the
>military world.
LOLOLOL....still holding on to that story, huh? Give it
|
|
|
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:26:43 -0800,
Hans
<nospam@anonydomain.com> wrote:
> "Clay Colwell"
> <eris@io.com> wrote:
>
>> "Theodore A. Kaldis"
>> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Daniel Jetson wrote:
>> >
>> > > The Designer's first t
|
|
|
John A. Weeks III <john@johnweeks.com> wrote:
>I am very much against letting Hinckley have unsupervised
>temporary leave from the hospital. The last time he was in
>public unsupervised, he shot 4 people, nearly killing our
>President, leaving one pe
|
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message news:<BIuHb.643$ma.22950@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>...
> ----------------------------- <^> <(·¿·)> <^> -----------------------------
>
> "Your name" <abelard_malcolm_tyler_lindsay@yahoo.com> wrote
|
|
|
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:48:34 -0500 (EST)
From: ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>
[ Add to Address Book | Block Address | Report as Spam ]
To: barbaraschwarz@excite.com <barbaraschwarz@excite.com>
Subject: RE: Complaint against cyber criminal G
|
|
|
Say you see a problem in internet. Say you retold the problem in your
own words in your work? Does that violate copyright if you do not know
who the original author is?
2 arguments:
1. Your analyzing and retelling of the problem count as derivative
|
|
|
The film "Haiku Tunnel" is pretty good.
(THe first time I've seen BART in a film!)
but I know a few things about lawyers.
so the film didn't seem realistic.
Most lawyers are mean, arrogant SOBs, esp. to temps.
TO come to think of it, I can't
|
|
|
"Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in
> It is not slander by the newspaper. They are merely quoting what the police
> said to them.
> You should sue the police spokesperson and the prosecutor.
"The threat to the public is very real," Senior
|
|
|
he Council of Europe ECHR search engine is temporarily out of
service.
This is a list of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
that have been posted to the ECHR Web site in ASCII text format. Cases
subsequent to 1996 are posted in MS W
|
|
|
> Otherwise you are paranoid, or don't know who you are.
>
Strange article to have
INVESTIGATOR FOUND GUILTY OF DEFAMING
as the feature related story.
check the picture
I can't sue the police force, I CAN sue the newspaper.
"dlk
|
|
|
Lee Hollaar wrote:
> In article <bsoep002qfj@enews1.newsguy.com> "Richard" <anonymous@127.000>
> writes:
>>Question, when was it written?
> "The letter is dated 1939."
>>If it was written before there was any such thing as copyright, then
|
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message news:<_aSHb.167$hU2.6259@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>...
> ----------------------------- <^> <(·¿·)> <^> -----------------------------
>
> "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote
> > |-|erc wrote:
>
|
|
|
"tinydancer" <tinydancer@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<yNwEb.14466$3k6.3688@bignews5.bellsouth.net>...
>
>
> So there's your answer to all those who have the girl half in the looney
> bin. Can't recall the name of the script, as it's fairly ne
|
|
|
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:37:05 +1000, |-|erc <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
: This is a newspaper report on me, I was later cleared and have no crim record.
:
:
: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/03/08/1015365742538.html
:
[.
|
|
|
"tinydancer" <tinydancer@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<15vGb.17749$n01.6061@bignews5.bellsouth.net>...
>
>> "she has a minor case maybe
>> of BEING bipolar.
>
>
> And you're willing to say this statement is significant?
> 'She has a mino
|
|
|
Rock_On_GWB@yahoo.com (Cleopatra) wrote in
news:d81ac9f.0312251052.5280abb4@posting.google.com:
> Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote in message
> news:<3FEAE208.BE9DC835@concentric.net>...
>
> (snip)
>
>> > How can you still have faith
|
|
|
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:30:26 +1000, "|-|erc"
<trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
>> Otherwise you are paranoid, or don't know who you are.
>>
>
>Strange article to have
>
> INVESTIGATOR FOUND GUILTY OF DEFAMING
>
>as the feature related st
|
|
|
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 01:14:25 GMT, malachi <malachi@ot.com> wrote:
>
>
>Richard wrote:
>
>> |-|erc wrote:
>>
>> >> http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/03/08/1015365742538.html
>>
>> > The Age knows the police were setting me up.
>>
>>
|
|
|
Boycotting Irish Companies ~ $555 Billion Homeland Security Contracts
National security demands the utmost vigilance and American hi-tech
defense industries must take care not to sub-contract any of the $555
Billion (FY 2004) U.S. Department of Homel
|
|
|
On 29 Dec 2003 04:14:49 GMT, marianneluban@aol.comnospam (MarianneLuban)
in misc.legal, wrote the following:
when I wrote:
>>Get a hobby, Marianne, and leave me be.
>
>What's your new hobby--psychoanalysis?
>Here is Dr. Moser, grousing because he
|
|
|
The first step is to find out the value of the estate. If the stock turns
out to be valuable, the second step is to see a probate attorney about
filing a probate. If the estate has no value other than the assets you are
presently dealing with, the ne
|
|
|
This site is an exposition of a personal case-history, and exposes serious
allegations of corruption and Human Rights abuses, involving UK government,
corporate, and institutional malfeasance in NHS research practices dating
from the 1960's. The issue
|
|
|
In article <bsoep002qfj@enews1.newsguy.com> "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> writes:
>Question, when was it written?
"The letter is dated 1939."
>If it was written before there was any such thing as copyright, then there
>is no copyright, even with t
|
|
|
This article states Sneddon wants to go through a, costly change of
jury selction systems before Michael's trial begins.
He is seeking to go from a one-step system to a two-step system.
I understand that the present one-step system is when qualified
|
|
|
Cleopatra <Rock_On_GWB@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Eeeeeeeeeew! So what? There is a natural percentage of the species
>that will do a great many nasty, disgusting, foul, stinky, unhealthy
>and socially destructive things.
As you so nicely demonstrate.
--
|
|
|
MB <""soaring\"@ c0.com> on 28 Dec 2003 suggested:
> If someone signs a contract then later dies without fulfilliing their
> part of the deal, what happens, does their estate have to complete it,
> are they in breech or??
>
The short answer
|
|
|
If someone signs a contract then later dies without fulfilliing their
part of the deal, what happens, does their estate have to complete it,
are they in breech or??
|
|
|
>Subject: Re: I got a speeding ticket in fast lane only doing 74 mph
>From: Katherine Griffis-Greenberg egylist@griffis-consulting.com
>Date: 12/28/2003 4:27 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <elsuuvkgh7jqr05ufnh7dspgu97t7sr48m@4ax.com>
>
>On 28
|
|
|
On 28 Dec 2003 18:48:54 -0800 jonathan <jonathanthio@yahoo.com.sg> whittled these words:
> If you answer my question about copyright law, and someone else say, I
> saw someone answer this in internet, chance is that would be okay
> right?
Nope - jus
|
