|
|
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:40:27 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote:
: I concur wholehartedly. It's an outrage/pity that the people running
: the state bar admission process don't have enough integrity or com-
: mon decency to perform
|
|
|
On 12/30/03 9:45 AM, in article 3ff18f88_2@news.sydney.pipenetworks.com,
"Rarin Horse" <rearinhorse@hotmail.com> wrote:
> So in other words, for purposes of a discussion about sexuality, she wasn't a
> "child" , because she was over the age of sexual
|
|
|
tjab wrote:
> In article <3FF371BB.1060105@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Dwayne White wrote:
>>
>>>On 12/30/03 9:45 AM, in article 3ff18f88_2@news.sydney.pipenetworks.com,
>>>"Rarin Horse" <rearinhorse@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
|
|
|
Well. Truckinsp. You are top cop. You have single handedly
diagnosed a narscisitic personality disorder; You have thwarted a con
man trying to con a car group; you have spotted a non-MD plate in a
picture of a Prelude car.
Now that you have been
|
|
|
"Stop the persecution" <CSA_is_a_con@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5d03867.0312311041.5d79f5dc@posting.google.com...
> "P. Tierney" <silviomossa@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:<bt0Gb.627789$HS4.4576571@attbi_s01>...
> > "Dave M" <djm_gb@y
|
|
|
XXX wrote:
> mshlomb@yahoo.com (Raul) wrote:
>
>>>And certainly most children of that age do not comprehend, nor are they
>>>prepared for the consequences
>>>that even consensual sex can bring. How many 12 year olds are ready to
>>>raise a child o
|
|
|
Geeez Dave.., you sound like your upset because someone asked the
question. Actually all I have is a copy of the incorporation charter which
had that title on it, and as I mentioned, issued by the State of Delaware.
However, I have read somewhere i
|
|
|
On 31 Dec 2003 12:35:57 -0800, nj_1975@hotmail.com (nick) wrote:
>I could find very little info on the VA state bar, but had 2
>questions:
>
>Could a misdimeanor that will be about 10 years old preclude me from
>gaining admission to the bar?
>
>D
|
|
|
"Larry Smith" <dbrigman3@charter.net> wrote in
news:vv5hudllpnh656@corp.supernews.com:
> Are you so sure about that? Prison labor creates a tempting
> incentive to go get more prisoners to increase the labor force. That
> in turn invites cutti
|
|
|
"The Holy Kafir" <x@x.x> wrote in news:bstvrm$eu0j$1@news3.infoave.net:
>
> I can agree with that. I do not know the particulars. It may be that
> the government has to bid to the corporations. It really depends on
> supply and demand, who's sell
|
|
|
hollaar@faith.cs.utah.edu (Lee Hollaar) wrote in message news:<bsqfd6$n2u$1@coward.ks.cc.utah.edu>...
> In article <797a9cfc.0312291526.4ab00d2f@posting.google.com> jonathanthio@yahoo.com.sg (jonathan) writes:
> >Does this applicable only for copyright
|
|
|
Dwayne White <budwhite@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<BC18CC45.78F%budwhite@earthlink.net>...
> On 12/30/03 9:45 AM, in article 3ff18f88_2@news.sydney.pipenetworks.com,
> "Rarin Horse" <rearinhorse@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The reasons for statutory
|
|
|
Abraxas wrote:
> Jade wrote:
>> Since it appears that your mother is the one who is in debt, no one but
>> your mother should be asking these questions. Most collectors
>>would want to speak with the person owing the debt, unless that person
|
|
|
>From: saylo1234@aol.com (LovingPerson)
> None-the-less, what I am trying to say is that I didn't realize that
>you were LE. I jsut thought you were some punk kid or some uneducated
>person jumping on the Moser-bashing wagon.
You might quit the
|
|
|
81mm wrote:
> I recently went through some old papers found in an old bookstore. In
> these papers I ran across an old copy of a corporate charter, which read
> "Internal Revenue Tax and Audit Service, Inc.", issued April 15, 1986, by
> the
|
|
|
IRS wrote:
> 31 Questions & Answers about the IRS
> http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm
Had you read that thing, you'd find in the first 2 questions that it is
anything but the truth.
Answer: The IRS appears to be a collection agency
|
|
|
81mm wrote:
> Geeez Dave.., you sound like your upset because someone asked the
> question. Actually all I have is a copy of the incorporation charter
> which had that title on it, and as I mentioned, issued by the State of
> Delaware.
>
|
|
|
81mm wrote:
> Mmmm? You mentioned "authorized" by etc., etc....! I don't get the
> "feeling" you what your talking about.., just where, when, and under
> which section..? A little more information might help.., y'ah think..?
hmmmmmm. I gu
|
|
|
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:39:12 GMT, "81mm" <res0n8e5@verizon.net> in
misc.legal, wrote the following:
> Mmmm? You mentioned "authorized" by etc., etc....! I don't get the
>"feeling" you what your talking about.., just where, when, and under which
|
|
|
Rev. Don Spitz <Glory2Jesus@ArmyofGod.com> wrote:
>The homosexuals that are molesting the children are not Christians.
They're not even homosexuals.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
|
|
|
ichard wrote:
> You need to understand that this is not legal advice which is only obtained
> by hiring an attorney.
> This is merely a discussion on helpful possibilities to remedy your
> situation.
> I don't pretend to be an attorney as some arou
|
|
|
Howard Goldstein wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>> I concur wholehartedly. It's an outrage/pity that the people running the
>> state bar admission process don't have enough integrity or common decency
>> to perform their evaluation process before a ca
|
|
|
81,
You may have in your possession some documents of a company calling
itself by that name, which is similar but not the same as the IRS. Why does
it confuse you that a tax service would have a name that is similar to a
taxing body? From the tit
|
|
|
IlLawgix00@aol.com (Kaia Gardner) wrote in message news:<62292ca8.0312311013.5a90c238@posting.google.com>...
> Two days ago I received a phone call from a police officer saying that
> she was holding my 17 y/o son and three of his friends at a Dillard's
|
|
|
Mmmm? You mentioned "authorized" by etc., etc....! I don't get the
"feeling" you what your talking about.., just where, when, and under which
section..? A little more information might help.., y'ah think..?
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:06:31 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
>> ~^ beancounter ~^ wrote:
>>> patsy is a freek...
>>
>> Psycho #@&@^ from hell ...
>
> About sums you up penny...
Who's penny? ... you obseq
|
|
|
erry Hatchett@alt.net <thatchett@rotangoprep.org> wrote in message
news:<bsr79f$e60$0@pita.alt.net>...
> Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> > Terry Hatchett@altopia.net the abusive ISP <thatchett@rotangoprep.org> wrote in message news:<bsq77s$ip5$0@pita.alt.n
|
|
|
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
http://www.nocem.org/
http://www.rahul.net/falk/quickrefs.html#W
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
@@BEGIN NCM HEADERS
Version: 0.9
Issuer: wollmannizer@spam.free
Type: spew
|
|
|
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> In article <BC18CC45.78F%budwhite@earthlink.net>
> Dwayne White <budwhite@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>>The reasons for statutory rape laws have very little to do with hating
>>sexuality but a lot to do with protecting our yout
|
|
|
Dwayne White wrote:
> On 12/30/03 9:45 AM, in article 3ff18f88_2@news.sydney.pipenetworks.com,
> "Rarin Horse" <rearinhorse@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>So in other words, for purposes of a discussion about sexuality, she wasn't a
>>"child" , because
|
|
|
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:05:40 GMT, "Manhattaner32" <mattypom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>I have a question regarding law school application questions. Specifically,
>a question asking "Have you ever been arrested or convicted of violating any
>law (other tha
|
|
|
n the nearly two months since the Aiken County Probate Court ruled in
favor of Creighton and appointed him as his mother's personal
representative, Creighton has done absolutely nothing to implement the
court's decision. He has not taken any steps to p
|
|
|
> >ONE, the email recipient was skeptics@kasm.com
> >
> >Say that fast 3 times, I know that wont hold in court but its meaningful
> >and related to my parnormal claim that names have meaning.
>
> Uhm, I see....Well, no, I don't, so I have to assume i
|
|
|
>
> Change her phone number to an unlisted one.
It already is. They are getting my number through the guarantor who has
received the loan default due to my mother filing bankruptcy.
> Get an aswering machine and let them yell at it.
They don't
|
|
|
I recently went through some old papers found in an old bookstore. In
these papers I ran across an old copy of a corporate charter, which read
"Internal Revenue Tax and Audit Service, Inc.", issued April 15, 1986, by
the State of Delaware. Mmmm, any
|
|
|
o goes the law
"w.kimbler" <w.kimbler@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:7TWHb.68535$VB2.134076@attbi_s51...
> Judge: Elders not required to report abuse
> Saturday, June 21, 2003
> By ANDREW WOLFE Telegraph Staff, wolfea@telegraph-nh.com
>
>
|
|
|
>From: saylo1234@aol.com (LovingPerson)
>
>Hi Truckinsp:
>
> You are not in my kill-file. Kill file was a figurative term
>meaning mentally was where I filed your posts. Now. Give me a
>second and hear me out a bit before you respond, plea
|
|
|
Larry Smith wrote:
> "Najena" <najena@coldmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns94621960F46Dnajenahotmail@63.218.45.21...
> > "The Holy Kafir" <x@x.x> wrote in news:bstqks$essr$4@news3.infoave.net:
> >
> > > Yeah yeah, we can all read, but is it goo
|
|
|
Howard Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:05:40 GMT, Manhattaner32 <mattypom@yahoo.com> wrote:
> :
> : If I respond no to the question, how likely is it to ever become an issue?
> : I would certainly reveal these events when applying to
|
|
|
Tim Provis wrote:
> If you respond no to the question, you are lying on your application. You
> could be dismissed from this school if they discovered your lie after
> admission. A lawyer's obligation to be truthful begins with his/her
> applicatio
|
|
|
After moving out of your apartment, I doubt your landlord would persue
you for rent owed, while not living there. It would cost him time and
money to fight this in court and he may not win if you are presently
destitute.
There is a Program in Philad
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am looking to go to law school within the next 3 years. I have a
misdimeanor conviction that in 1999 for an unfortunate encounter with
a police officer who brought charges against me that were completely
false, and the subsequent plea agreement.
|
|
|
Good grief!
Contact a lawyer immediately! Do _not_, repeat _not_, post admissions of
guilt in public like this.
|
|
|
Gauche to follow up to my own post, I know....but to just to amplify
it a little bit perhaps you would take this as an opportunity to
practice at something you'll be doing routinely as an attorney, i.e.,
disclosing adverse material to the tribunal.
|
|
|
"- Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
news:SArIb.763$CH5.66522@news.uswest.net...
>
>
> "- Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:...
> >
After scanning through this mass of verbiage I was unable to find a single
line of co
|
|
|
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:05:40 GMT, Manhattaner32 <mattypom@yahoo.com> wrote:
:
: If I respond no to the question, how likely is it to ever become an issue?
: I would certainly reveal these events when applying to the bar. I wonder,
: however,
|
|
|
You need to understand that this is not legal advice which is only obtained
by hiring an attorney.
This is merely a discussion on helpful possibilities to remedy your
situation.
I don't pretend to be an attorney as some around here do.
Abraxas
|
|
|
Bob Stock wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:05:40 GMT, "Manhattaner32" <mattypom@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>>I have a question regarding law school application questions.
>>Specifically, a question asking "Have you ever been arrested or convicted
> o
|
|
|
81mm wrote:
> I recently went through some old papers found in an old bookstore. In
> these papers I ran across an old copy of a corporate charter, which read
> "Internal Revenue Tax and Audit Service, Inc.", issued April 15, 1986, by
> the
|
|
<