|
|
"John James" <not@all.co.uk> wrote in message news:<3ff4c213$0$32271$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.com>...
> You'd sure make a great juror though. "I think the guy's innocent...".
> "Why?" ask the rest of the panel. "Well, I know it's not PC... but he *said
|
|
|
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 18:11:06 -0700, "** Vox Dei ©" <vox@dei.rex>
wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 11:05:18 -0700, "** Vox Dei ©" <vox@dei.rex>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:36:28 -0700, "=> Vox
|
|
|
> Once tax season starts up in earnest, we will see posts asking "can
> tax refunds be taken by the bankruptcy trustee"? And the answer is
> YES. Your tax refund is one of your assets and it can be used to pay
> off your debts.
Partially. While a
|
|
|
I'd rather not mention the school, but I will say that I have seen more than
a few different law schools ask about arrests in addition to convictions.
"Bob Stock" <xxx@x.com> wrote in message
news:o6t5vvc6t025fqhsm795grh3sh4rsr8k97@4ax.com...
> On Wed
|
|
|
>From: "Richard" anonymous@127.000
>FYI, truckins [truck inspector] is not to be trusted as a source of law
>interpretation.
>He only claims to be employed as a "truck inspector" whose main job is
>working at truck weigh stations.
LOLOLOL.....lo
|
|
|
I loaned someone $1,000.
He wrote me 10 blank but signed checks, which were to be deposited once
per month for $100, for 10 months.
I was able to deposit the first two months, but the past
6 months, he has told me I can't deposit because he has
|
|
|
>This whole affair is nothing more than damn politics.
We don't really know anything, yet.
In other news:
"Q: What did Michael Jackson say when he heard he was having a child?"
"A: I hope it's a boy!"
C//
|
|
|
In article <QS3Jb.19600$IM3.11916@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
N Raghavan <raghavann@earthlink.net> wrote:
>If a person is 2months short of eligibility to retire with pension benifits
>and gets his/her job terminated does the peron have a good c
|
|
|
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 13:52:02 -0600, "Richard" <anonymous@127.000>
wrote:
> Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH wrote:
>
> > Michael Jackson under fire on brutality claim
> > Michael McKenna
> > 02jan04
>
> > MICHAEL Jackson was threatened with new cri
|
|
|
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 19:33:57 +0000, Katherine Griffis-Greenberg
<egylist@griffis-consulting.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 11:49:08 -0700, Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH <>
>in misc.legal, wrote the following:
>
>>Michael Jackson under fire on br
|
|
|
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 19:30:22 GMT, Courageous
<joekraskaREMOVETHIS@san.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Even if michael was deliberately lying, this is no crime.;
>
>Yeah, I have a hard time understanding what the charge could be.
>
>>My god - cop
|
|
|
"sparkup" <junksender888@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ECA0AF4.3030308@hotmail.com...
>
>
> Robert Miller wrote:
> > "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
> > news:nzvva.40$x%2.47759@news.uswest.net...
> >
> >>"Ian Bailey" <ianbai
|
|
|
>From: ">Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH <>
>My god - cops falsely accuse people all the time and nobody gives two
>#@($s about it.
Police DON'T falsely accuse people "all the time"....they bring evidence to
court based on what they see and what
|
|
|
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 11:49:08 -0700, Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH <>
in misc.legal, wrote the following:
>Michael Jackson under fire on brutality claim
>Michael McKenna
>02jan04
>http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,8300837%
|
|
|
> Even if michael was deliberately lying, this is no crime.;
Yeah, I have a hard time understanding what the charge could be.
>My god - cops falsely accuse people all the time and...
I think that people care quit a bit about malici
|
|
|
drawnai@hotmail.com (Ian) wrote in message
> Great excuse, loads of blokes, myself included have been fancied
> by girls when they were coming of age. It's a great compliment,
> but sometimes you've just got to keep your cock in your trousers.
>
>
|
|
|
Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3FF4960F.4070803@hotmail.com>...
> Hillary uses a very old truth and twists it into her feminist theory. A
> village raises better children than a city. No single mom is able to
> raise a child wel
|
|
|
John James wrote:
> "The Mighty Quenelle" <hahahohohehe666@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:7c769753.0401011609.38b16f31@posting.google.com...
>
>>Maybe it's just me but in this case it's clear that the real victime
>>is the man. I know that not
|
|
|
The Mighty Quenelle wrote:
> Maybe it's just me but in this case it's clear that the real victime
> is the man. I know that not PC to tell that, but the girl is not a
> victim, she just wanted to have sex and she had it. I don't think
> she's traumati
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" wrote:
> Howard Goldstein wrote:
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
[snip]
> Ken is quite articulate, I'll give him that. And apparently Ken does quite a
> bit of legal research on a given issue -- though other attorneys have
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------92190C6A3AF85E9ACF8A53D2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
"Theodore A. Kaldis" wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
> > [...] IOW, even if I actually d
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" wrote:
> Howard Goldstein wrote:
>
> > Ken's reply article was well written IMO, I feel sad for him that for
> > whatever reason, he can't comply with the bar examiners.
>
> Oh yes, I almost forgot. Ken's latest move was to f
|
|
|
As I posted in the other post, I am not interested in continuing to
bicker, Truckinsp.
Now, how about some substantive answers to my questions. I am done
with the back and forth posts of name calling and one-upsmanship. I
am ready for some decent
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 11:05:18 -0700, "** Vox Dei ©" <vox@dei.rex>
> wrote:
>
>> Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:36:28 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>>> On Wed,
|
|
|
In article <3FF4960F.4070803@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Raul wrote:
>> Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3FF3B25B.5060709@hotmail.com>...
>>
>>
>>>In fact no woman is ready to raise a child on her own. Desp
|
|
|
In article <XhFIb.17252$IM3.10324@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Abraxas <charlesmartinNOMO@RESPAMmindspring.com> wrote:
>Richard wrote:
>I've been told that recording my calls may not be legal...is that true?
It depends on the state. Federa
|
|
|
Once tax season starts up in earnest, we will see posts asking "can
tax refunds be taken by the bankruptcy trustee"? And the answer is
YES. Your tax refund is one of your assets and it can be used to pay
off your debts.
If you file bankruptcy betw
|
|
|
Maybe it's just me but in this case it's clear that the real victime
is the man. I know that not PC to tell that, but the girl is not a
victim, she just wanted to have sex and she had it. I don't think
she's traumatized by the sex itself (maybe by the
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Howard Goldstein wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> [snip]
>> Ken is quite articulate, I'll give him that. And apparently Ken does quite
>> a bit of legal research on a given issue -- though
|
|
|
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 01:49:10 +1100, "Rarin Horse"
<rearinhorse@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
>news:53d9b2ac590e2149b91ac60264504d16@dizum.com...
>> In article <BC18CC45.78F%budwhite@earthlink.net>
>> Dway
|
|
|
drnobody <noone@invalid.antispam.com> wrote in message news:<slrnbv7ba2.1la.noone@localhost.localdomain>...
> What about DNA evidence that the brother is the
> biological father to the sister's baby?
>
There's no need. Men's word is worth twice th
|
|
|
s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) wrote in message news:<6bd12cd6.0312202112.11aef3a1@posting.google.com>...
> http://www.theroyalgazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20031219/NEWS/112190078
>
> A two time sex pest was sent to prison for ten years y
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> [...] IOW, even if I actually did have a psychiatric condition (I don't),
>> There are those who say that, based on your conduct here in misc.legal over
>> the past 6 months,
|
|
|
Raul wrote:
> Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3FF3B25B.5060709@hotmail.com>...
>
>
>>In fact no woman is ready to raise a child on her own. Despite a
>>century of feminist nonsense, two parents are needed as a minimum to
>>ra
|
|
|
31 Questions & Answers about the IRS
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm
"81mm" <res0n8e5@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:luBIb.7177$nK2.4768@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> I recently went through some old papers found in an old bookstore.
|
|
|
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 11:05:18 -0700, "** Vox Dei ©" <vox@dei.rex>
wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:36:28 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:06:31 -0700, "=>
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------A5EB876DC4B9916F6AF33845
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
"Theodore A. Kaldis" wrote:
> Howard Goldstein wrote:
>
> > Ken Smith wrote:
[sn
|
|
|
LovingPerson wrote:
> Dear Kathy et. al:
> Bear with me. This isn't the same old re-hash of the thread.
> I know the discussion on the newsgroup has been quite heated.
> I just re-read many of everyone's posts. This time, I a
|
|
|
I agree that you need a lawyer ASAP.
But although it is important that you keep a felony off his record,
you might consider that it would be a useful lesson for him to face
some discomfort from this, so that he learns a lesson early in life.
Has he do
|
|
|
Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH wrote:
> Michael Jackson under fire on brutality claim
> Michael McKenna
> 02jan04
> MICHAEL Jackson was threatened with new criminal charges yesterday for
> accusing Californian police of brutality during his
|
|
|
Hello!
Sorry if this has been asked before!
My father is thinking about putting his house in my name, in the event
of his untimely passing, as my mother is ill and is not in the state
to make certain financial decisions.
However, I have several
|
|
|
Howard Goldstein wrote:
[snip]
> I think he brings up a subject that seems to cross professional lines.
> The NY Times (think it was the times) ran a piece a couple or three
> months ago on a NJ physician's battles with his state's licensing bod
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------ED18446CAC16BE19E02A063D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Howard Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:58:59 -0800, Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldi
|
|
|
In article <797a9cfc.0312312125.5389ba85@posting.google.com> jonathanthio@yahoo.com.sg (jonathan) writes:
>Without notice how can we be sure that the work is not registered
>within 3 months of publication?
Look up the registration at the Copyright Of
|
|
|
Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3FF3B25B.5060709@hotmail.com>...
> In fact no woman is ready to raise a child on her own. Despite a
> century of feminist nonsense, two parents are needed as a minimum to
> raise a healthy child.
|
|
|
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:58:59 -0800, Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
: Howard Goldstein wrote:
:
: > Ken Smith wrote:
:
: >> I concur wholehartedly. It's an outrage/pity that the people running the
: >> state bar admissi
|
|
|
In article <3FF3C21E.40301@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>tjab wrote:
>> In article <3FF371BB.1060105@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Dwayne White wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 12/30/03 9:45 AM, in article 3ff18f88_2
|
|
|
Michael Jackson under fire on brutality claim
Michael McKenna
02jan04
MICHAEL Jackson was threatened with new criminal charges yesterday for
accusing Californian police of brutality during his arrest for child
sex abuse.
Santa Barbara sheriffs d
|
|
|
nick wrote:
> I am looking to go to law school within the next 3 years. I have a
> misdimeanor conviction that in 1999 for an unfortunate encounter with
> a police officer who brought charges against me that were completely
> false, and the sub
|
