|
Deering Precision Instruments, L.L.C. v. Vector Distrib. Sys., Inc.
The CAFC remanded a case to the district court to determine the question is
whether the patentee can rebut the Festo II presumption that the amended
text was composed with awareness of this rule and that the territory
surrendered is not an equivalent of the territory claimed. The CAFC decided
that this question is better addressed in the first instance by the district
court.
For more patent information, see
http://www.patentcribsheet.com/Cases/deering.html.
--------------------------------
This posting contains educational information for lawyers directly
impacting patent preparation and prosecution. It does not constitute legal
advice, nor does it create or constitute any attorney-client relationship.
|
| |
| |
|
