|
|
On 2 Jan 2004 04:49:44 -0800, ausstu@primus.com.au (ausstu) wrote:
>"- Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:<8XrIb.186$xo.146856@news.uswest.net>...
>> "Abu-Alwafa" <almared_alarabi@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:ScpIb.3117$Ur.14982
|
|
|
"Joyce" <JoyceInGates@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:1434-3FFEB202-43@storefull-3252.bay.webtv.net...
>
> Well, Bullis, or Richard certainly get's
> everyone to respond to his posts....
>
> As much as you all wish he would disappear to another n
|
|
|
In article <e2eb3c97.0401082007.739039e2@posting.google.com>,
pigfarm9999@yahoo.com (Laura Bush - America's kid-killer) wrote:
> steve sullivan <steve@spamhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:<steve-3B517E.19081407012004@news.sf.sbcglobal.net>...
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:58:40 GMT, slim <pickins486@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>Phil wrote:
>>
>> On 8 Jan 2004 17:06:47 -0700, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >And that's the end of it. Those against smoking bans in restaurants
|
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:01:03 GMT, slim <pickins486@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>> All you have to do is post like an adult, Mike.
>
>I did.
>
>>That means honestly and without insults.
>
>I did.
>
>>And I'm not talking for one or two posts.
>
>
|
|
|
Phil wrote:
>
> On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:21:24 GMT, slim <pickins486@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Phil wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 03:11:48 GMT, slim <pickins486@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> The way you post, you must not want
|
|
|
Phil wrote:
>
> On 8 Jan 2004 17:06:47 -0700, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson)
> wrote:
>
> >And that's the end of it. Those against smoking bans in restaurants
> >and bars have only one, I repeat, only one, valid opposition--that
> >bans
|
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:17:42 GMT, FredR@SkepticTank.REMOVE.ORG
(Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
> desertphile@cchr.ws (Dr. Desertphile) wrote:
> >REPOSTED FOR ALT.USENET.KOOKS TO ENJOY.
> >Funny how it's often raving psycho lunatics who work so hard tryin
|
|
|
Smoker's widow awarded $20 million
Award against tobacco company is first by New York state jury
NEW YORK (AP) --The widow of a longtime smoker killed by lung cancer was awarded
$20 million in punitive damages Friday, though her ability to collect mo
|
|
|
Mark Anderson wrote:
> In article stanlee_98@yahoo.com says...
>>>> The ban, however, exempts bars and restaurants.
>>>
>>> Give them a few months.
>>
>> You're an idiot. I bet you don't even know where Jackson (or MS) is
>> located, so why don't y
|
|
|
|
|
|
In article stanlee_98@yahoo.com says...
> >>The ban, however, exempts bars and restaurants.
> >
> >Give them a few months.
>
> You're an idiot. I bet you don't even know where Jackson (or MS) is
> located, so why don't you mind your own damn busin
|
|
|
In article vox@dei.rex says...
> Sure Matt, like every other prediction made by loser
> drug addicted smoker scum that the laws wouldn't
> stand, would be repealed, would be ignored, would
> ruin businesses, wouldn't spread nation/worldwide ...
> the
|
|
|
On 8 Jan 2004 17:06:47 -0700, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson)
wrote:
>And that's the end of it. Those against smoking bans in restaurants
>and bars have only one, I repeat, only one, valid opposition--that
>bans hurt business. They don't. End
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>> I'll just comment on this bit:
>>> The timing is also suspicious. He files for visitation in October, and
>>> she suddenly "falls off" a cliff in November.
>> He filed for
|
|
|
On 8 Jan 2004, manwithabook@hotmail.com (HomeMadePizza) wrote:
> [ OP wrote: ]
>
>> "I am almost certain that were I to file for divorce,
>> my husband would take all of his money, leaving my
>> son and me homeless and destitute."
>
> . . . first
|
|
|
"MB" <""soaring\"@ c0.com> wrote in message
news:5nnLb.894$Pg.605@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0108interrogate08.html
> <Summary County Attorney in Phoenix tells schools it's illegal for
> parents to
|
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004, SMZ <SMZ@noemailplease.no> asked/said in
pertinent part in substance:
> I am borrowing about $15,000 from a parent
> to be repaid within some stated (probably 4 or
> 5 year) fixed term to enable me to repay another
> debt whos
|
|
|
Hi All,
I have some legal issues regarding the resignation from a job and I
sincerely hope that someone who may know the answer can help me.
I once joined a marketing research company and resigned from the
company with one-month's notice before I
|
|
|
On 8 Jan 2004, kidrides4u@yahoo.com (tim) said in pertinent part in
substance:
> I am currently employed in Nebraska by a trucking
> company that hasn't paid $1,300 in current and
> back wages, enough to keep it in small claims court,
> i know. Ho
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
I'll just comment on this bit:
> The timing is also suspicious. He files for visitation in October, and she
> suddenly "falls off" a cliff in November.
He filed for visitation in Feb. of '99 and it was granted in Oct. of '99.
|
|
|
A dramatic device often used in courtroom dramas is the existence of a
"smoking gun", such as an audio or video tape, which absolutely proves
the case for one side, but which cannot be presented at trial due to
the rules of evidence. I've often wonder
|
|
|
> Scott Weiser wrote:
>>> Personally I don't care, I'll get around one of those LLB idiots on
>>> the right, or even take
>>> them on the shoulder when they aren't paying attention. I even got
>>> around the infamous
>>> Scott Weiser in his Humme
|
|
|
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:14:10 -0700, Scott Weiser
> <fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Really? How interesting. What color was it? When did you do so? Any special
>> distinguishing characteristics of my Hummer you might have noticed which
|
|
|
On 8 Jan 2004 20:28:43 -0700, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson)
wrote:
>>
>>Riverside County, CA Bans Hiring of Deputies that Smoke [12/18-3]
>>
>>On the Internet, many help-wanted ads for police officers across the nation
>>include not smoking
|
|
|
On 8 Jan 2004 17:08:16 -0700, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson)
wrote:
>In article <eamLb.55$iE6.33564@news.uswest.net>, ** Vox Dei © <--> wrote:
>>Sweden to Become World's 5th Smokefree Country [12/23-5]
>>
>>
>>Excerpts from: Sweden to Become
|
|
|
On 8 Jan 2004 17:07:27 -0700, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson)
wrote:
>In article <89mLb.54$iE6.33548@news.uswest.net>, ** Vox Dei © <--> wrote:
>>Jackson, MS Approves Smoking Ban; Exempts Bars and Restaurants [12/26-4]
>>
>>
>>Excerpts from: C
|
|
|
On 8 Jan 2004 17:06:47 -0700, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson)
wrote:
>And that's the end of it. Those against smoking bans in restaurants
>and bars have only one, I repeat, only one, valid opposition--that
>bans hurt business. They don't. End
|
|
|
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 02:43:57 -0500, "asdf"
<dariussquaredREMOVE---@---THIShotmail.com> wrote:
>This group (alt.quit.smoking.support) is not here to force it's beliefs upon
>others.
The same with nyc.general
Phil
|
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:21:24 GMT, slim <pickins486@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>Phil wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 03:11:48 GMT, slim <pickins486@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> The way you post, you must not want me to answer your question.
>> >
>
|
|
|
Phil wrote:
>
> On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 03:11:48 GMT, slim <pickins486@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >> The way you post, you must not want me to answer your question.
> >
> >Semantic mouth-boxing is not your forte, you liar.
>
> All you have to do, M
|
|
|
FredR@SkepticTank.REMOVE.ORG (Fredric L. Rice) wrote in message news:<vvsed2th0b2p65@corp.supernews.com>...
> desertphile@cchr.ws (Dr. Desertphile) wrote:
>
> >REPOSTED FOR ALT.USENET.KOOKS TO ENJOY.
> >Funny how it's often raving psycho lunatics who
|
|
|
Dan Evans <dan@evans-legal.com> wrote in message news:<1hnrvv0ute60hdsge75i7oafpt1fkpl5kb@4ax.com>...
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:50:38 GMT, SMZ <SMZ@noemailplease.no> wrote:
>
> >My questions:
> >
> >* What elements are required in a loan agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
I found a good legal website.
very helpful and useful information.
http://www.goforlaw.com/
|
|
|
unavailable at this time wrote:
> To take on a defamation case on a contingency basis.
> Against employer. Deep pockets.
> Please let me know asap if you want to discuss details.
From South Africa?
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.
|
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 20:45:28 GMT, Krusty <krusty9875@SPAMBLOCKyahoo.com> wrote:
: I'm a law student who is trying to get to get a job. Does anyone have
: any tips as to making a good legal resume (format, appearance,
: relevant info that should
|
|
|
Roberto wrote:
> Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote in message news:<3FEAE208.BE9DC835@concentric.net>...
> > Bob wrote:
> >
> > > "Hans" <nospam@anonydomain.com> wrote in
> > > news:vuk79k8eonlk1f@corp.supernews.com:
[snip]
> > >
|
|
|
his is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------DB63A8DAB7983A33E87BA38E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
"Theodore A. Kaldis" wrote:
> Ken, here is my response to your latest meanspirited sland
|
|
|
"Morf" <central222@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FFDDBB4.3EB@hotmail.com...
> Steve Furbish wrote:
> > And your rhythmic chanting of that particular mantra falls short of even
> > qualifying as an argument. All instances of deadly force are no
|
|
|
"Phil" <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote in message
news:lerrvv0tc6e56rgniunb9kojrum7vb79hs@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:08:33 -0500, "Steve Furbish"
> <sfurbish@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
>
> >> >Actually, numerically very few died as a result of the
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken, here is my response to your latest meanspirited slander:
> You don't have anything to say in rebuttal, because everything I say is
> true. Sucks for you, doesn't it?
Ken, we're going to pu
|
|
|
In article <6f9e1b49.0401081618.5312ec07@posting.google.com>,
papajack@stic.net (Papa Jack) wrote:
>
> BTW, why do you blame the evils of this temporary
> world on God? The Bible clearly teaches that Satan
> (aka the great Deceiver) brings us th
|
|
|
stanlee_98@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 8 Jan 2004 20:28:43 -0700, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson)
> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Riverside County, CA Bans Hiring of Deputies that Smoke [12/18-3]
>>>
>>> On the Internet, many help-wanted ads for police officers a
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:52:45 -0700, "** Vox Dei ©" <vox@dei.rex>
> wrote:
>
>> Mike Helm wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:35:01 -0700, "** Vox Dei ©" <vox@dei.rex>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Personally I don't care, I'll get around
|
|
|
Scott Weiser wrote:
>> Mike Helm wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:25:50 -0700, "** Vox Dei ©" <vox@dei.rex>
>>>
>>>> Phil Earnhardt wrote:
>>>>> I had one question in this thread. Apologies if it was already
>>>>> covered:
>>>>>
>>>>> When drivin
|
|
|
Contact the Nebraska Department of Labor at 402-595-3095. Find out from
them where the local office is. File a wage claim against both employers.
If your state is like mine, the department of labor will pursue the claims
for you.
McGyver
"tim"
|
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:14:10 -0700, Scott Weiser
<fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>Really? How interesting. What color was it? When did you do so? Any special
>distinguishing characteristics of my Hummer you might have noticed which
>would prove th
|
|
