|
|
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:28:36 -0700, Scott Weiser <fat.chance@privacy.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The science is exact: Maximum highway efficiency is achieved when *all*
>> traffic lanes are *equally* full of vehicles traveling at the *same* speed.
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:34:58 GMT, tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P)
> wrote:
>
>> In article <BC29E3E6.2A8E%fat.chance@privacy.com>, Scott Weiser
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> In article <BC28B699.28ED%fat.chance@privacy.com>, Scott Weis
|
|
|
In article <4004A0CE.5010803@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Even if you had a clue you couldn't explain the time of day. Hate makes
>you sterile. Did you know that?
Is that why you have a niece and not a daughter?
>Idiots
|
|
|
In article <bu27i3$lrl$1@stan.redhat.com>,
Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>tjab wrote:
>> In article <eFKMb.8272$XF6.179107@typhoon.sonic.net>,
>> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in mess
|
|
|
"The Masked Bishop" <tmb@c4.com> wrote in message
news:Fi0Nb.32$BA2.26@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com...
> ????
>
> What the @$#* is all this?
>
>
Sam hit the wrong button? He really meant to fax this somewhere, and instead
in a blur of STD drug in
|
|
|
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:34:58 GMT, tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P)
wrote:
>In article <BC29E3E6.2A8E%fat.chance@privacy.com>, Scott Weiser wrote:
>
>>> In article <BC28B699.28ED%fat.chance@privacy.com>, Scott Weiser wrote:
>
>>>> What a laugh.
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:35:34 -0800, Scott in Aztlán
<slothkills@THEyahooOBVIOUS.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:31:09 -0700, Scott Weiser <fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>
>>Out of arguments and stinging from being thoroughly whipped in the deba
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:31:09 -0700, Scott Weiser
<fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:42:05 GMT, tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P)
>> wrote:
>
>> Of course not he's a known passive/aggressive former "peace officer"
>> w
|
|
|
"Bystander" <marloviannocannedmeat@fsmail.net> wrote in message
news:40044d35$0$9389$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
> Isn't it funny how people who live in one of the Wold's most secular
> societies suddenly rediscover heaven and hell when a he
|
|
|
"Scott in Aztlán" <slothkills@THEyahooOBVIOUS.com> wrote in message
news:sr17005e9pt3odkj1kgdobeoeeumns6hv1@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:08:28 GMT, "Da Parrot-chick" <just@sk.me> wrote:
>
> >A recently retired police chief told me, in respons
|
|
|
On 13 Jan 2004 in alt.hackers.malicious, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
made his/her contribution to mankind by stating in
news:4004148E.4020200@hotmail.com:
> Ann wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:17:26 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:15:19 -0000, "Robbie" <nouser@nodomain.com>
wrote:
>
>"Mike Helm" <mhelm@not.known> wrote in message
>news:hqg600dqckv9tk5q9mui8pvj0gm4g3vrje@4ax.com...
>>
>> I don't think you did. I was trying to be sarcastic.
>>
>
>He
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:22:11 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>just_me1issa wrote:
>> "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote in news:SlWMb.1434$AA6.257@fed1read03:
>>
>>
>>>"Ann" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>>news:3ka700lkam9epo7k01td2
|
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:400370BC.9040703@hotmail.com...
>
> One might think that, but Ann argued that it was about being physically
> grown. Ann said, "All that means is that I need to refine the
> definition. I need t
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:53:50 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Ann wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:17:26 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ann wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:12:51 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.
|
|
|
"Steve" <popmusic@att.net> wrote
> I seem to remember that "Weird Al" Yankovich always got
> permission for his spoofs. Thanks for any info.
Yes, and sometimes he complained that he could not get
permission, and had to drop spoof plans. For commer
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 at 15:53 GMT, Bob wrote in soc.men:
>Ann wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:17:26 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Are you saying, Ann, that the tall girls were "adult" because they
>>>had reached full height
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 at 18:09 GMT, Bob wrote in soc.men:
>Raqui wrote:
>> "Ann" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
>> news:3ka700lkam9epo7k01td2fpjg6v12mg15o@4ax.com...
>>
>>>Yes, but we were also trying to come up with a definition of an
>>>adult.
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 at 08:22 GMT, Ann wrote in soc.men:
>Yes, but we were also trying to come up with a definition of an
>adult. Got any ideas?
I don't have a definition, but the differences between a 21-year-old
(obviously an adult) and a 12-yea
|
|
|
In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Wally Cleaver wrote
in message <pho800t3q4p1538h545lsqtnq0h9gc2tmi@4ax.com>:
>On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:53:09 -0800, <40043E95
|
|
|
--
"I'm at peace
with my lust.
I can kill because in God I trust.
It's Evolution, baby."
Pearl Jam "Do the Evolution"
"Daedalus" <jadeyb@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:vom800h88o0oavjv3jh9s91vhk4ntdgeiu@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2
|
|
|
n Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:53:09 -0800, <40043E95.BB59172E@sprintmail.com> "Arthur
L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote:
>Wally Cleaver wrote:
>
>> On 12 Jan 2004 20:31:30 -0800, <b7fe1abc.0401122031.553e70bf@posting.google.com>
>> david_michael@
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 at 15:18 GMT, Sky King wrote in soc.men:
>I think its difficult to come up with a universal definition that
>would fit every country and every culture.
Profound words from the poster with more experience than anybody else
of fi
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:37:45 GMT, gunhed57@NRismykicktoy.pacbell.net
(Steve Chaney, NR's Tormentor ®), wrote:
>
>Awwwwwwwww, what happened dood?
>GOT KICKED OFF OF HOTMAIL for your rape threat antics?
>
>So much for your bragging about how the rul
|
|
|
>Bob SD wrote
>I wonder if your mythical christ molested young children like the minion
priests and bishops who claim to represent him now?
Maybe. Maybe worse stuff too that didnt make it into the official version of
The Bible we have today.
Di
|
|
|
"Katherine Griffis-Greenberg" <egylist@griffis-consulting.com> wrote
> but that seems to be the focus of the inquiry as to whether
> prison staff were negligent.
Well, should prison officers prevent a prisoner commit suicide, and if yes
why?
|
|
|
Why is Liddy lying about where he really was on 26 May 1972?
Note the ALL CAPS EMPHASIS in the following excerpts of Liddy's
self-conflicting stories of the evening of 26 May 1972.
CAREER-LIAR LIDDY'S FIRST STORY IN HIS BOOK, "WILL":
"On 26 May
|
|
|
Hi, I am a beginner photographer that is looking into selling some of my
photos.
Where I live there are many historical significant buildings around. Some
of these buildings are now private homes and are either owned by
individuals, or non-pro
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:55:00 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
>Mike Helm wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:30:28 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ok Bob. You keep thinking that way. I'll read about your arrest in
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:31:09 -0700, Scott Weiser <fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>Out of arguments and stinging from being thoroughly whipped in the debate by
>me, Unka Sam resorts again to childish ad hominem attack.
>
>Loser.
, he said, resorti
|
|
|
"Crystal Dreamer" <crystaldreamer02@trashhotmail.com> wrote in message news:<1008693b2od44a7@corp.supernews.com>...
> This situation is very absurd and childish. I have requested that it be
> dropped many times but this person keeps going on.
>
> In
|
|
|
> > I seem to remember that "Weird Al" Yankovich always got
> > permission for his spoofs. Thanks for any info.
>
> Yes, and sometimes he complained that he could not get
> permission, and had to drop spoof plans. For commercial
> use, you need per
|
|
|
Mike Helm wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:26:01 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
>
>
>>Ann wrote:
>
>
>>>That's what we've been arguing about all along. To just reiterate it
>>>isn't much good. I don't think a 12 year old is a woman and I
|
|
|
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:54:05 -0700, Scott Weiser
> <fat.chance@privacy.com>
>
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:16:24 -0700, Scott Weiser
>>> <fat.chance@privacy.com>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Why should I risk them scraping the side of my car whe
|
|
|
Peter J Ross wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 at 20:31 GMT, Bob wrote in soc.men:
>
>
>>just_me1issa wrote:
>>
>>>Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in news:40045155.20002@hotmail.com:
>>>
>>>
>>>>The classic man hating feminazi. She believes that
|
|
|
Peter J Ross wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 at 01:32 GMT, Mike Helm wrote in soc.men:
>
>
>>On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:31:51 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com>
>>
>>>just_me1issa wrote:
>>>
>>>>Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in news:40045155.20002@
|
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4003374F.8090507@hotmail.com...
>
> Here's one.
>
> From dictionary.com
>
>
> adult \A*dult"\, n. A person, animal, or plant grown to full size and
> strength; one who has reached maturity.
|
|
|
eternallyinlove2222@hotmail.com (The real Barbara Schwarz) wrote in message news:<4e128d38.0401131455.12801f1f@posting.google.com>...
>> But actually, you =cannot= explain where you got this information,
>> because if you search your memory, you will
|
|
|
King Pineapple wrote:
> Smirking Leftist College Freshman "Ken Smith" <Ranger57@concentric.net>
> wrote in message news:4004030D.EE4EC18A@concentric.net...
> > King Pineapple wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > There is only one possible conclusion
|
|
|
"MAK" <maks70@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8ep7001495gt9qje8o5p06kutf6lfmh1gq@4ax.com...
> Hello,
> I got a ticket for not wearing seat belt in SFO,CA. I was waiting for
> the notice for paying my fine. I did not receive it for month or so.
>
|
|
|
solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote in message news:<20040113155822.15381.00002740@mb-m12.aol.com>...
> >Bob SD wrote
>
> >I wonder if your mythical christ molested young children like the minion
> priests and bishops who claim to represent him no
|
|
|
Isn't it funny how people who live in one of the Wold's most secular
societies suddenly rediscover heaven and hell when a headline beckons?
|
|
|
Supreme Court OKs 'informational roadblocks'
By Gina Holland
Associated Press
The Journal Gazette
Tuesday, January 13, 2004
Washington - The Supreme Court, in a
case watched anxiously by law
enforcement agencies across the
United States, held
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:34:20 GMT, "Da Parrot-chick" <just@sk.me> wrote:
>> <Sound of Oregon being crossed off the list of Scott's potential vacation
>> destinations for next summer>
>
>Ah, Scott--you remember Oregon's old tourism slogan: "Come visit
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:28:36 -0700, Scott Weiser <fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>The science is exact: Maximum highway efficiency is achieved when *all*
>traffic lanes are *equally* full of vehicles traveling at the *same* speed.
>
>Mandating that
|
|
|
"just_me1issa" <just_me1issa@somewhere.com> wrote:
> Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> >> So we could all argue our points and opinions until
> >> we are blue in the face, the bottom line is
> >> that it is ILLEGAL. I don't care if the
|
|
|
"Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote:
> "Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote:
> > "just_me1issa"<just_me1issa@somewhere.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Chomp chomp! LOL
> > >
> > >"Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote in message
> > >news:ttDMb.129$AA6.98@fed1read03
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:54:05 -0700, Scott Weiser
<fat.chance@privacy.com>
>
>
>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:16:24 -0700, Scott Weiser
>> <fat.chance@privacy.com>
>>
>>>
>>>> Why should I risk them scraping the side of my car when they try to put
|
|
|
"Mike Helm" <mhelm@not.known> wrote in message
news:hqg600dqckv9tk5q9mui8pvj0gm4g3vrje@4ax.com...
>
> I don't think you did. I was trying to be sarcastic.
>
Hehe, what a fool I am......
Robbie
---
Please scan any attatchments with your ow
|
