|
|
"welby" <welby@REMOVETHISpcslink.com> wrote:
> "David James Polewka" wrote:
> > There's plenty of justification for unleashing SARS
> > and new flus.
> > You would rather procrastinate than look at it.
>
> You're right. I'd rather put off readi
|
|
|
"Beth" <jobeth66@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:da094148.0401221654.2ea25994@posting.google.com...
> The policy definition states that a temporary substitute vehicle is a
> vehicle you use while your primary vehicle is out of service due to
> acci
|
|
|
When Bob shreiks, it sounds something like:
> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>> When Bob shreiks, it sounds something like:
>>
>>
>>>Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>So how do you get from "a feminist cannot help you understand
>>>>>soc.men
|
|
|
"Sir Bob" <sirbob@penguinking.com> wrote in
news:40105883$1@news3.accesscomm.ca:
> "No 33 Secretary" <taustin+usenet@hyperbooks.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns947859B7BEC2Ftaustinhyperbookscom@216.168.3.50...
>> "Sir Bob" <sirbob@penguinking.com>
|
|
|
When Chas shreiks, it sounds something like:
> "Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote
>> Do you socmen *all* snip so thoroughly because you're cowards, or
>> because you're all so embarassed of what you type?
>
> I see this in 'misc.leg
|
|
|
C.R. Krieger wrote:
> This would not be the first troll we have
> evicted because he failed to understand what rec (*recreation*, as in having
> *fun*) . autos (*automobiles*, not rolling military refugee behemoths) .
> driving (which has nothin' to
|
|
|
When Raqui shreiks, it sounds something like:
>
> "Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote in message
> news:40104b45$0$4811$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net...
>> When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
>>
>> > Robert Buchana
|
|
|
When Bob shreiks, it sounds something like:
> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>> When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
>>
>>
>>>Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>
>>>>When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
|
|
|
When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>> When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
>>
>>
>>>Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>
>>>>When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
>>>>
>>>>
|
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:34:18 -0700, Scott Weiser
<fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:26:13 -0600, "C.R. Krieger"
>> <warp2_shadowMAPS@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Uncle Samuel" <stars@bars> wrote in message
>>> news:q4d01
|
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:07:41 -0700, Scott Weiser
<fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 16:47:02 -0700, Scott Weiser
>> <fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Scott Weiser" <fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote in mess
|
|
|
Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???> wrote in
news:40103afc$0$4811$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
> When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
>
> "Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote in message
> news:400ffaaa$0$4812
|
|
|
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:13:54 -0800, "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote:
>
>"Ann" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
>news:g45u00hrnffhl0oa46kaqg31pcbhkvp42h@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:06:07 -0800, "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
|
|
|
"Nik Coughin" <nrkn!no-spam!@woosh.co.nz> wrote in message
news:RiYPb.20637$9k7.380416@news.xtra.co.nz...
> Bill Jackson wrote:
> > "Nik Coughin" <nrkn!no-spam!@woosh.co.nz> wrote in message
> > news:WzWPb.20564$9k7.377911@news.xtra.co.nz...
> >> B
|
|
|
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:12:10 -0800, Michael Snyder
<msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>Ann wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:52:17 -0800, Michael Snyder
>> <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ann wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:30:13 -0800, Mi
|
|
|
> Satpal was charged with the murder of Clarke Pierce. His barrister did not
meet with him and only saw him for about 40 minutes before the trial.
That might help to explain his conviction.
Yours faithfully,
John Aidiniantz
www.homepage-lin
|
|
|
"Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message
news:bupfdt017gq@enews4.newsguy.com...
> What's your problem?
Bullis, you are the problem.
> If you don't like what I have to say, learn to use your killfile and be
done
> with it.
> I do not own
|
|
|
"realitytrucker" <timp1232@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.0401212316.55b90a94@posting.google.com...
> Cain, Informant...truce for a while ok? So I can make a point.
>
> Ok,so Bullis is an asshole. We don't need Cain, Informant, or anyone
|
|
|
"David James Polewka" <joseywales@outlaw.nospam> wrote:
> If governments decided to stop suppressing SARS and new flus,
> it would not be murder. Period, end of story.
1) Nice to hear that governments can not only keep the ten
commandments out of
|
|
|
"Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message
news:bupfdt017gq@enews4.newsguy.com...
> What's your problem?
> If you don't like what I have to say, learn to use your killfile and be
done
> with it.
>
How come you don't do that yourself?
> I
|
|
|
"seo mark" <yonnermark@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bupa2d$kimv5$1@ID-132564.news.uni-berlin.de...
> by the way, he worked on susan's case for free if I remember correctly.
> You're little amateur site suggests he's a mercinary, working to free
|
|
|
Billy wrote:
> My wife is filing for divorce and has filed a fictitious police report to
> get a restraining order to remove me from the home. We have 2 pets that I
> could not take from the house and one needs special care.
> I'm told by in-l
|
|
|
"SEO Mark" <yonnermark@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bup9ou$jgt1p$1@ID-132564.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Alexander Baron wrote:
> > This publication is now available on-line. Please spread the word.
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/satpalramisgui
|
|
|
"Nik Coughin" <nrkn!no-spam!@woosh.co.nz> wrote in message
news:WzWPb.20564$9k7.377911@news.xtra.co.nz...
> Bill Jackson wrote:
> > "Nik Coughin" <nrkn!no-spam!@woosh.co.nz> wrote in message
> > news:9dWPb.20532$9k7.377876@news.xtra.co.nz...
> >> B
|
|
|
What a a bunch of loony dumbasses.
There is no such thing as "medicinal marijuana". Marijuana is illegal by
FEDERAL law.
Federal law over rides any state law.
The states may impose stiffer penalties, but they can not legalize which has
been made il
|
|
|
In article <buptru$t5i$2@stan.redhat.com>,
Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>tjab wrote:
>> In article <bupi65$sn0$4@stan.redhat.com>,
>> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>tjab wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <bup8uu$s9r$1@stan.re
|
|
|
>
> Qui s'inquiète ?
Oh mais, je ne m'inquiète pas..... je ne fais que m'interroger ... ;-)
Fabrice.
|
|
|
When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>> When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
>>
>> "Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote in message
>> news:400ffaaa$0$4812$ad3619e8@news.netc
|
|
|
In article <40107D17.4090604@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Robert Buchanan wrote:
>> ... a third-rate troll like me...
>
>That about sums him up.
Does that put him ahead of or behind you?
|
|
|
In article <bupt8p$t57$1@stan.redhat.com>,
Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>It's not false. They're drafted because they're men. They die because
>>>they're drafted. They can't vote because they've died. A leads to B
>>>leads to
|
|
|
Try findlaw.com ED
|
|
|
"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote
> >But unlike some here, I don't think only people who have been in combat
> >should be allowed to vote.
> Er, do some people here (where?) really think that?
It's kind of an extension of Robt. Heinlein's i
|
|
|
|
|
|
"First Prophet of Kaos" <kaos@ecn.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:qau010140vpe4rj4tvb37l271b2tji2ftm@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 07:31:04 -0600, "Sir Bob" <sirbob@penguinking.com>
> wrote:
>
> >"First Prophet of Kaos" <kaos@ecn.ab.ca> wrote in mess
|
|
|
"Sir Bob" <sirbob@penguinking.com> wrote in message
news:40109651$1@news3.accesscomm.ca...
> "First Prophet of Kaos" <kaos@ecn.ab.ca> wrote in message
> news:qau010140vpe4rj4tvb37l271b2tji2ftm@4ax.com...
> > On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 07:31:04 -0600, "Sir
|
|
|
When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>> When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
>>
>>
>>>"Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote in message
>>>news:400ff8c1$0$4812$ad3619e8@news
|
|
|
Les "Temoins" ont s'en "Jehovah" pas mal!
"JaBrIoL" <Jabriol@excite.com> wrote in message
news:d222de3e.0401220708.4342ccc6@posting.google.com...
> Bonjour à tous et toutes !
>
>
>
http://radio-canada.ca/regions/Montreal/nouvelles/200401/16/005-j
|
|
|
When Chas shreiks, it sounds something like:
Do you socmen *all* snip so thoroughly because you're cowards, or because
you're all so embarassed of what you type?
> "Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote
>> Do you know anything about mi
|
|
|
When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
"Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote in message
news:400ffaaa$0$4812$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net...
>> Why do socmen make these childish attempts to turn every issue into a
>> ge
|
|
|
"Nik Coughin" <nrkn!no-spam!@woosh.co.nz> wrote in message
news:9dWPb.20532$9k7.377876@news.xtra.co.nz...
> Bill Jackson wrote:
> > "realitytrucker" <timp1232@aol.com> wrote in message
> > news:8a7d8469.0401212259.60888e7e@posting.google.com...
> >
|
|
|
My wife is filing for divorce and has filed a fictitious police report to
get a restraining order to remove me from the home. We have 2 pets that I
could not take from the house and one needs special care.
I'm told by in-laws that I still have contac
|
|
|
"welby" <welby@REMOVETHISpcslink.com> wrote:
>"David James Polewka" wrote:
>> If governments decided to stop suppressing SARS and new flus,
>> it would not be murder. Period, end of story.
>
>Government decisions require justification as much or
|
|
|
When Michael Snyder shreiks, it sounds something like:
>
> "Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote in message
> news:400ff8c1$0$4812$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net...
>> When tjab shreiks, it sounds something like:
>>
>> > In article <400
|
|
|
"Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote
> Thanks very much for your response. You see, your ignorance is of great
> value to me.
Yes; you seem to have a representative collection of it.
I particularly like your display of Arrogant Ignoran
|
|
|
by the way, he worked on susan's case for free if I remember correctly.
You're little amateur site suggests he's a mercinary, working to free any
murderer who can pay enough dough
|
|
|
discoverybay@aol.comstipated (FabulousDisneyBabe.com) wrote in message news:<20040119213823.22792.00000355@mb-m18.aol.com>...
> Hey, they allowed a fake election, why not?
>
> Fab
>
> ROY AND STANLEY ARE RIGHT!!!
> http://www.fabulousdisneybabe.co
|
|
|
Alexander Baron wrote:
> This publication is now available on-line. Please spread the word.
>
> http://www.geocities.com/satpalramisguilty/ram_tainted_intro.html
>
> http://www.geocities.com/satpalramisguilty/
All I know is that mansfield support
|
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 07:31:04 -0600, "Sir Bob" <sirbob@penguinking.com>
wrote:
>"First Prophet of Kaos" <kaos@ecn.ab.ca> wrote in message
>news:c3lu00d5bvma1bblo3plmcj032b45trcpm@4ax.com...
<snip>
>> Or email to khaot @ icq.com <alternate email addr
|
|
|
ere's a repost for Arif's sake:
>> I wrote:
>> What is lawful is normal,
> Some other Usenet pundit bloviated:
> ROTFL! Hardly. I can think of myriad activities that are lawful that
> are FAR from normal.
So, I replied:
That depends on y
|
|
|
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:42:07 -0600, "Richard" <anonymous@127.000>
> Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
>
> > State Supreme Court Allows Fake Police Reports
>
> > By Paul Glusman
> > Special to the Planet
> > BERKELEY DAILY PLANET
> > Friday, January 16, 20
|
|
