|
|
"welby" <welby@REMOVETHISpcslink.com> wrote:
> "David Polewka" wrote:
> > Putting demented geezers in rest homes to
> > suffer in infirmity is calculated neglect.
>
> But if any person would choose such an existence over your misanthropic
> idea
|
|
|
Did our dear skipper really choke on a pretzel or did he fall cos he was
drunk or perhaps he was knocked out by his mistress?!
|
|
|
On 23 Jan 2004, heckidontknow1@hotmail.com (I get scammed) wrote:
> ... here is where I contend the fraud is. This is the specific
> wording "You were selected to receive this offer on the basis of a
> report provided by a credit reporting agency'
|
|
|
Scott Weiser wrote:
> In the law, the law defines what is "normal" behavior and what is
proscribed
> behavior. Proscribed behavior is abnormal behavior. It's abnormal because
> it's proscribed, in the context of the law.
That argument is circu
|
|
|
"s_knight8" <s_knight8@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6bd12cd6.0401231921.2dba2197@posting.google.com...
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4031624/
>
> "There is lots of history about black men being falsely accused of
> this crime by white women," M
|
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:54:35 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Michael Snyder wrote:
>> Ann wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:12:10 -0800, Michael Snyder
>>> <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> They weren't denied the
>>> vote
|
|
|
I jumped into this thread late, and it's kind of hard to follow anyway
since it has gotten so huge from people quoting every response. The
only thing I have to add is that here in Washington State, this
situation is pretty well addressed in the motor
|
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:19:29 -0800, Michael Snyder
<msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>Ann wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:13:54 -0800, "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Ann" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>>news:g45u00hrnffhl0oa46kaqg3
|
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:15:01 -0800, Michael Snyder
<msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>Ann wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:12:10 -0800, Michael Snyder
>> <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ann wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:52:17 -0800, Mi
|
|
|
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 07:36:28 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote
>> Why are you bringing up jail cells?
>
>Because prison is the punishment for refusing the draft (when applicable).
>Men
|
|
|
On 23 Jan 2004 09:50:30 -0500, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>In article <bISdnfPhyIXzrIzdRVn-ig@comcast.com>,
>Chas <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>>"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote
>>> Why are you bringing up jail cells?
>>
>>
|
|
|
Alexander Baron <a_baron@abaron.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<8LshHlDb9BEAFws$@abaron.demon.co.uk>...
> This publication is now available on-line. Please spread the word.
>
> http://www.geocities.com/satpalramisguilty/ram_tainted_intro.html
>
|
|
|
This message refers to laws in the United States.
A friend of mine with admittedly poor judgment recently told me about
a law, that makes it a DUI or, physical control of a motor vehicle
while intoxicated, which is roughly equivalent to have the keys i
|
|
|
stanlee_98@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:07:25 -0500, "dnarshAKAmax"
> <dnarsh@intergate.com> wrote:
>
>
>>To see the graphic methods used to promote the addicion to nicotine, however
>>innocently it was done, watch Turner Classic Movi
|
|
|
National Tricolour a fundamental right: SC
The Pioneer
Saturday, January 24, 2004
Indraprasth (Agencies) -Fifty seven
years after India's independence, the
Supreme Court Friday declared that
citizens have a fundamental right to
hoist the Natio
|
|
|
n article <4b6d2dd6.0401231725.24a37@posting.google.com>, Nate Nagel
<njnagel@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Scott Weiser <fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:<BC3469B1.392A%fat.chance@privacy.com>...
>
> And who are you to determine who is and
|
|
|
In article <539c21bd.0401231514.392d843f@posting.google.com>,
Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>I have to thank you again for this lead. Thru it, and several
>more that it led me to, I have now been able to increase my
>list of states an
|
|
|
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4031624/
Inga Causey, attorney for the Resource Center of Eagle County, said
releasing more details about Bryant's accuser would lead to fewer
women reporting rapes. She said rape reports dropped in Florida after
William
|
|
|
Michael Snyder wrote:
> Overlooking the above -- how do you figure? What behavior
> would enable a jury to conclude that he must have understood
> that she wasn't consenting?
> [. . .]
> Well, that's a problem in itself -- but its a separate probl
|
|
|
"DemocRAT Exterminator" <joninblvu@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht
news:a0a7c60a.0401230609.55be09fa@posting.google.com...
> > this paragragh above. If she was ambigous in withdrawing consent, then he
> > might not have known. You say a jury could stil
|
|
|
Chas wrote
>> Do you socmen *all* snip so thoroughly because you're cowards, or because
you're all so embarassed of what you type?
>
>I see this in 'misc.legal'
As do i. As much as i wish it wasnt here... LOL
-------
have a GREAT day !!!!!
|
|
|
A Usenet persona calling itself Arif Khokar wrote:
> Arif Khokar wrote:
>>> When are you going to post that cite equating illegal with abnormal,
>>> dumbass.
>
> Scott Weiser then posted a lie:
>
>> I did. You must have missed it.
>
> No, yo
|
|
|
"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message
news:busg7m$kqm@rac1.wam.umd.edu...
> In article <539c21bd.0401231514.392d843f@posting.google.com>,
> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >I have to thank you again for this lead. Thru it, an
|
|
|
cott Weiser <fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote in message news:<BC3469B1.392A%fat.chance@privacy.com>...
>>>>>> Traffic ahead of you moving slower? move left.
>>>>>
>>>>>No, slow down and maintain a safe following distance.
>>>>
>>>>Why? If you're ob
|
|
|
Usenet persona calling itself Arif Khokar wrote:
> Scott Weiser wrote:
>
>> In the law, the law defines what is "normal" behavior and what is
> proscribed
>> behavior. Proscribed behavior is abnormal behavior. It's abnormal because
>> it's proscr
|
|
|
John James wrote:
> "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message
> news:burui7$i8$1@stan.redhat.com...
>
>>Raqui wrote:
>>
>>
>>>But this is 2004 and not the way voting is determined today. As far as
>
> my
>
>>>comments about Bob.
|
|
|
"Patrick Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkisj2te06.fsf@fnord.io.com...
> Wally Cleaver <wally_cleaver@mayfield01net> writes:
>
> >On 23 Jan 2004 12:53:16 -0600, <szkad4ebioz.fsf@fnord.io.com> Patrick
Humphrey
> ><patrick@io.com> w
|
|
|
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:50:20 -0500, "Robert Miller"
<rmiller0100@comcast.net> wrote:
>I've read much about doing a FOIA request lately. I've never been in
>trouble with the law. I've been thinking about doing one about myself
>out of curiosity. W
|
|
|
"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:20a110hs5n76pclpgnnfpm2t7l57g1me96@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:05:23 -0700, "Chas"
> <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >"Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote
>
|
|
|
"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9e8110dto4igkhhqjsi1973b8padh4q4g7@4ax.com...
> On 22 Jan 2004 10:37:00 -0500, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
> >In article <MZRPb.10061$XF6.206735@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> >Michael Snyder <
|
|
|
"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ol711058iaqslqu9vritoksk5vlc6ir9hj@4ax.com...
> And for that matter, why throw in a law that discriminates against
> men, because she's talking about a law that discriminated against
> women
|
|
|
Michael Snyder wrote:
> tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<burq7g$r2s@rac2.wam.umd.edu>...
>
>>In article <539c21bd.0401230948.56b40fba@posting.google.com>,
>>Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrot
|
|
|
To anyone who doesn't believe in encouraging trolls, I've discovered
that "Robert Buchanan" is a fake identity created only 3 weeks ago,
and used primarily for cross-post trolling between various newsgroups
and the troll-group alt.usenet.kooks. Easily
|
|
|
Bob wrote:
> Michael Snyder wrote:
>
>> tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message
>> news:<burq7g$r2s@rac2.wam.umd.edu>...
>>
>>> In article <539c21bd.0401230948.56b40fba@posting.google.com>,
>>> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
|
|
|
"Cleopatra" <LiberalsAreScoundrels@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8df02577.0401221423.7af41a46@posting.google.com...
> tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message
news:<buoqr0$n59@rac3.wam.umd.edu>...
> > In article <J3SPb.10064$XF6.206276@typhoon.so
|
|
|
"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6i8110p82udqdhseafpu7e2mqqe2ivuvok@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:18:05 GMT, "Michael Snyder"
> <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote
|
|
|
"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message
news:bup5l8$sv6@rac3.wam.umd.edu...
> In article <QpUPb.10099$XF6.206843@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >Well good for you! I think the vote should be extended to w
|
|
|
Sky King wrote:
> On 23 Jan 2004 09:50:30 -0500, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
>
>>In article <bISdnfPhyIXzrIzdRVn-ig@comcast.com>,
>>Chas <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote
>>>
>>>>Why ar
|
|
|
Ann wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:54:35 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Michael Snyder wrote:
>>
>>>Ann wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:12:10 -0800, Michael Snyder
>>>><msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>>>The
|
|
|
"DemocRAT Exterminator" <joninblvu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a0a7c60a.0401221215.64ca0cd9@posting.google.com...
> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message
news:<bun95c$p8i$1@stan.redhat.com>...
> > DemocRAT Exterminator wrote:
>
|
|
|
n 23 Jan 2004, heckidontknow1@hotmail.com (I get scammed) wrote:
> ... The words "pre-approved" [in connection with unsolicited
> credit card offers] DO NOT mean "you're eligible to receive
> an advertisement".
In general, this is incorrect. Y
|
|
|
"Ann" <me@privacy.net> wrote
> For your information Bob, I'm a logician. I'm also a woman.. but
> hell... I can reconcile the two...
Oooooh; every time you tell a lie, it makes the Baby Jesus cry-
c.
|
|
|
"Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote
> No..the feminist want women to have the same duties as men in the
> military but not the same physical standards. This is reflected in
> the physical requirements being lower for women starting in basic
> train
|
|
|
Linda Goldstein wrote:
> I had a perfectly good PC with Comcast connection.
> I decided to try SBC/Yahoo DSL. When they installed it with me my PC
> stopped working immediately.
> Now I cannot even hook up with Comcast. My PC doesn't work.It i
|
|
|
"Jim Beebe" <jbeebe@centurytel.net> wrote in message news:<PL-dncXsJPFTA43dRVn-sw@centurytel.net>...
> A cult of abuses
>
> Arizona Republic, January 22, 2004
>
> Colorado City females are property, to trade and 'assign'
>
> Children kept out of
|
|
|
In article <burumv$i8$3@stan.redhat.com>,
Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>BTW, why *do* you add so many blank lines to the end of all your posts?
Required by the server for reasons that I have no say over. My apologies.
It's a pain
|
|
|
"Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote in message
news:kjfQb.9725$bg1.1071@fed1read05...
>
> "just_me1issa" <just_me1issa@justguess.com> wrote in message
> news:40117e81$1_5@127.0.0.1...
> >
> > "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote in message
> > news:_4fQ
|
|
|
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 04:11:29 GMT, Laurie S. <lauriellen@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On 22 Jan 2004 08:15:15 -0500, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
>>In article <400f796f$0$4812$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net>,
>>Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???> w
|
|
|
tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<burq7g$r2s@rac2.wam.umd.edu>...
> In article <539c21bd.0401230948.56b40fba@posting.google.com>,
> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
> >tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<buejm3$ml5@rac
|
|
|
"Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote in message
news:_4fQb.9702$bg1.9505@fed1read05...
> > >>And it is very long and very boring. The same old opinions have been
> > >>posted over and over and are getting nowhere. The femroids insist on
> > >>their
|
