|
|
little over a year ago, while in the midst of a civil custody case
against the government of Missouri, despite years of clean urine test
results, I incurred a false positive hair test for drugs. I began
writing a Trial Brief on the subject of hair test
|
|
|
Michael Snyder wrote:
> Ann wrote:
>> Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>Michael Snyder wrote:
>>>>Ann wrote:
>>>>> Michael Snyder wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>They weren't denied the
>>>>>vote because they were men.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Being men caus
|
|
|
On 22 Jan 2004 01:50:55 GMT, Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???>
with the help of a thousand monkeys banging on keyboards, was finally
able to type out the following:
>When Bob shreiks, it sounds something like:
>
>> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>
|
|
|
emesis wrote:
> On 25 Jan 2004 03:35:59 GMT, Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???>
> with the help of a thousand monkeys banging on keyboards, was finally
> able to type out the following:
>
>>And Vagrak smote Nemesis, damning him to a response
|
|
|
tjab, analog, tjab, Sky King, Laurie S. wrote:
>>>>> Do you mean to tell me that no American women have ever died
>>>>> in the line of duty?
>>>>
>>>> Not in direct offensive ground combat they haven't. They are
>>>> banned from serving there.,
|
|
|
In article <b6p510pusk2qmuf9ssmvcn52vif715smi4@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:44:17 -0700, Scott Weiser
> <noreply@desired.invalid> wrote:
> A search of the leading online legal dictionaries for the term"normal
|
|
|
In article <j8GQb.10383$QA4.3720@news01.roc.ny>, Arif Khokar
<akhokar1234@wvu.edu> wrote:
> Scott Weiser wrote:
>
> > Premise: The law defines "normal" behavior as behavior which is
> > "according to, constituting, or not deviating from an establi
|
|
|
On 24/1/04 21:18, in article buunc0019l6@enews3.newsguy.com, "Richard"
<anonymous@127.000> wrote:
> When the law is worded in that manner, it really gives an officer "carte
> blanche" authority to arrest you simply for the fact you were in a vehicle
|
|
|
On 24/1/04 21:54, in article FOBQb.34981$r05.28805@fe19.usenetserver.com,
"Thomas Anantharaman" <tsa@biostat.wisc.edu> wrote:
>> I am normally a fan of the credit card issuer MBNA since they are less
>> aggressive than many other issues in charging f
|
|
|
In article <j2EQb.9506$Z04.2413@news02.roc.ny>, Arif Khokar
<akhokar1234@wvu.edu> wrote:
> >Scott Weiser wrote:
>
> >>In the law, the law defines what is "normal" behavior and what is
> >>proscribed behavior. Proscribed behavior is abnormal behavi
|
|
|
A Usenet Persona calling itself Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:19:29 -0700, Scott Weiser
> <fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>
> >In the law, the law defines what is "normal" behavior
>
> In the Colorado Revised Statutes the term "n
|
|
|
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
>What other splendid insights could we not achieve by a
>prolonged discussion?
any.
hth
-- astri
|
|
|
ew York Times
January 25, 2004
The Tyranny of Copyright?
By ROBERT S. BOYNTON
Last fall, a group of civic-minded students at Swarthmore College received a
sobering lesson in the future of political protest. They had come into
possession of some
|
|
|
>Just because you had been accepted, doesn't mean they can't deny you in the
>future.
>That's business. Live with it.
>
>Don't get mad. Get even. Complain back.
Interesting suggestion... but, "complain back" to whom?
Actually, I am working at ma
|
|
|
"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message
news:buucml$oib@rac1.wam.umd.edu...
> In article <GsnQb.10487$XF6.211656@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message
> >news:buroa0$m
|
|
|
"s_knight8" <s_knight8@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6bd12cd6.0401240938.7a87bdcc@posting.google.com...
>
http://www.vaildaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040123/NEWS/401230101
> "This has served only to re-victimize her over and over,"
|
|
|
I am a technical writer and an independent contractor. In the metro
area where I live, there is an e-mail newswire that goes out to
thousands of local technical companies. They make their revenue by
running ads from local companies that provide servi
|
|
|
You clearly have no written contract, but you may have a legally binding
oral contract with your roommates. Assuming you have an oral contract of
a month to month sublet is reasonable given the facts. On the other hand
I assume you told them you are
|
|
|
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:33:38 GMT, Marc Goodman
<marc.goodman@comcast.net> wrote in message id
<40122CEC.9090509@comcast.net>:
>David Polewka wrote:
>> O.K., Adolf, whatever you say.
>I hereby invoke Godwin's law. This thread is
>officially clos
|
|
|
DemocRAT Exterminator wrote:
> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message news:<bus967$13p$1@stan.redhat.com>...
>
>>DemocRAT Exterminator wrote:
>>
>>>"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message news:<ipbQb.10314$XF6.210034@typ
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C3E269.9E1D9C50
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
http://zinewatch.homestead.com/JohnAndKen.html
------=_NextPar
|
|
|
tjab wrote:
> In article <uuAQb.10577$XF6.213056@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message
>>news:buucml$oib@rac1.wam.umd.edu...
>>
>>>In article <GsnQb.10487$XF6.211656@typhoon
|
|
|
In article <4012F9F3.BD766DF9@ieee.org>, analog <analog@ieee.org> wrote:
>
>tjab wrote:
>>
>> So in other words, the majority of men won't be allowed to vote
>> under your system either, since they've never been in combat.
>
>Nope, only women, be
|
|
|
Raqui wrote:
> "tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message
> news:busg7m$kqm@rac1.wam.umd.edu...
>
>>In article <539c21bd.0401231514.392d843f@posting.google.com>,
>>Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I have to thank you again for this
|
|
|
Gary Collard wrote:
> Michael Snyder wrote:
>
>>"s_knight8" <s_knight8@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:6bd12cd6.0401231921.2dba2197@posting.google.com...
>>
>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4031624/
>>>
>>>Inga Causey, attorney for the Resourc
|
|
|
Rico X. Partay wrote:
> "Jonathan" <jrcdehc@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:umnQb.5443769$be.880995@news.easynews.com...
>
>>OK, assuming two people of the same
>>gender get married in Massachusetts, and
>>move to a state that does not
|
|
|
I recently received a investment offer from South Africa to help the
heirs of a wealthy man get the money outside of the country. The South
African Government wanted to illegally confiscate their money for tax
purposes. I sent $250,000 by wire to the b
|
|
|
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote:
>"BlackWater" <bw@barrk.net> wrote in message
>news:hmtt00te7jo05qjrl6m98pajksv8p0hs0m@4ax.com...
>
>> Oh well, as you noted, there are a great many
>> "selective pacifists" out there.
>
>It's this wa
|
|
|
In article <xKzQb.11444$bg1.10938@fed1read05>, Raqui <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote:
>
>"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message
>news:buud6p$pai@rac1.wam.umd.edu...
>> I take it you don't agree with the proposition that "Taxation
>> without representa
|
|
|
I WAS READING AN ARTICLE FROM ADRIANVI ABOUT REGPAY AND CHILD PORN. FROM
WHAT I UNDERSTAND THOSE SITES SUCH AS BOYS MOVIES DO HAVE THE MESSGE
THAT THEY ARE LEGAL IN USA. ALTHOUGH WEATHER OR NOT I DO NOT KNOW BUT
SOME PICTURES ON THOSE SITES ARE LEGAL.
|
|
|
In article <uuAQb.10577$XF6.213056@typhoon.sonic.net>,
Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message
>news:buucml$oib@rac1.wam.umd.edu...
>> In article <GsnQb.10487$XF6.211656@typhoon.sonic.net>,
>> Michael
|
|
|
(misc.legal added. Original post not trimmed, so misc.legal readers
can follow.)
Ray K wrote:
>
> Took my 16 y.o. daughter to the Los Gatos DMV for her driving test yesterday.
> At the suggestion of her driving school instructor who said, "arrive
|
|
|
Hi there,
I wonder if someone can give me some advice regarding my Landlord-tenant
dispute. To cut a long story short, I'm living a very poorly managed
apartment complex in New Mexico, which I'm trying to get out of. When I
moved in, the apartmen
|
|
|
william lynch <x@y.z> wrote in message news:<BC340BEE.DA5%x@y.z>...
> in article syzPb.4386$5m3.357@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com, Bill Jackson at
> no@noway.con wrote on 1/21/04 10:29 AM:
>
> >
> > "H.B. Elkins" <hbelkins@restrictorplates.mis.net> wr
|
|
|
analog wrote:
> tjab, analog, tjab, Sky King, Laurie S. wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>Do you mean to tell me that no American women have ever died
>>>>>>in the line of duty?
>>>>>
>>>>>Not in direct offensive ground combat they haven't. They are
>>>>>banne
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not searching for legal advice, just an answer to my question. I
recently moved into an apartment with two friends but now due to
personal financial reasons, I'm having to leave. I doing all I can to
find someone to replace me and I'm confident t
|
|
|
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:58:24 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote
>> Sure..as long as ALL women pass the same physical standards as the men
>> starting in basic. We did away with separate stand
|
|
|
A Usenet Persona calling itself Arif Khokar wrote:
> Persona Grata wrote:
>
> > Of course,
> > you've deliberately evaded responding to the information you asked for in
> > that reply, snipping all but a few lines and making an irrelevant and
>
|
|
|
tjab wrote:
> In article <xKzQb.11444$bg1.10938@fed1read05>, Raqui <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote:
>
>>"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message
>>news:buud6p$pai@rac1.wam.umd.edu...
>
>
>>>I take it you don't agree with the proposition that "Taxatio
|
|
|
A Usenet Persona calliing itself Arif Khokar wrote:
> Scott Weiser wrote:
>
> > Arif Khokar wrote:
>
> >>Scott Weiser wrote:
>
> >>>In the law, the law defines what is "normal" behavior and what is
> >>>proscribed behavior. Proscribed behavio
|
|
|
Fixed typo.
Thomas Anantharaman wrote:
> I am normally a fan of the credit card issuer MBNA since they are less
> aggressive than many other issues in charging fees when you might not
> EXPECT them.
>
> However, in December, I took advantage
|
|
|
> >>I am an officer of a LLC. Some its clients sued the corporation about a
year
> >>ago and the case is going to trial. They have named me personally as
DOE-1
> >>and sued me (personally) only 2 months ago. Though I was mentioned by
name
> >>in the
|
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:19:29 -0700, Scott Weiser
<fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>In the law, the law defines what is "normal" behavior
In the Colorado Revised Statutes the term "normal' is not defined in
the traffic code.
http://198.187.128.1
|
|
|
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:44:17 -0700, Scott Weiser
<noreply@desired.invalid> wrote:
>The standard dictionary definition which does seem to apply in the
>legal context defines "normal" as "according with, constituting, or not
>deviating from a norm,
|
|
|
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:41:41 -0700, Scott Weiser
<fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>On 1/22/04 11:01 PM, Uncle Samuel bloviated:
>
>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:34:18 -0700, Scott Weiser
>> <fat.chance@privacy.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2
|
|
|
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 07:19:01 GMT, analog <analog@ieee.org> wrote:
>
>tjab, Sky King, Laurie S. wrote:
>
>>>> Do you mean to tell me that no American women have ever died in
>>>> the line of duty?
>>>
>>> Not in direct offensive ground combat the
|
|
|
">parr\(*>" <gniKyruaL@BTInternet.moc> wrote:
>"David James Polewka" <joseywales@outlaw.nospam> wrote:
>
>| There's plenty of justification for unleashing SARS and new flus.
>| You would rather procrastinate than look at it.
>
>You should have tea
|
|
|
">parr\(*>" <gniKyruaL@BTInternet.moc> wrote:
>"David Polewka" <imbibe@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>| Putting demented geezers in rest homes to suffer
>| in infirmity is calculated neglect. Allowing their
>| lives to come to a merciful end so the you
|
|
|
"michael" <copsR@yourdoor.com> wrote in message news:<4012c68e_1@news.iprimus.com.au>...
> "Greybeard" <graskagg@REMOVETHISwelho.com> wonders:
> >
> > Is religious faith the cause of insanity? Or are insane people religious?
> Or
> > is relegious fa
|
