|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:31:36 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Ann" <me@privacy.net> wrote
>> Some people really do think that dying would be better.
>
>Yes ma'am.
>They stand at the ramparts to protect you.
>A simple 'Thank
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:36:57 -0600, "C.R. Krieger"
<warp2_shadowMAPS@yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Brandon Sommerville" <grimrod@mindless.com.gov> wrote in message
>news:9f93388f9ceaec13954840057d604d61@news.teranews.com...
>
>(Snipping logical argument to S
|
|
|
jmrandom wrote:
> Over the past weekend, I recieved my first traffic citation, a speeding
> ticket for doing 41 in an 18. I had just exited onto a major road from
> the highway. The speed was posted as 30 mph. Now, this road is
> on the fringe o
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:56:29 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote
[...]
>> I also have life experiences that tell me that you have to pick your
>> fights carefully. Telling the average per
|
|
|
What if you live in a mobile home/motor home??
I'm sure there's got to be something non-permanent that you can do to
your car (block the wheels?) to make it irrelevant whether you possess
the keys, provided of course you do not place them into the ig
|
|
|
jmrandom wrote:
> "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message
> news:bv538s02afg@enews3.newsguy.com...
>> Go to the county courthouse and get all the documentation you can get
>> your hands on for that road. An 18mph speed limit? Most lik
|
|
|
On 27 Jan 2004 08:33:16 -0800, ARS-is-a-cult@myway.com (The only true
Barbara Schwarz - other postings with my name are forgeries) wrote:
> Ever heard of freedom of thoughts?
Why don't you take your medication like a good little psycho?
Now then
|
|
|
Tom wrote:
> Howdy.
> About 2 months ago I accidentally knocked over a parked motorcycle on
> private property in CA, no accident report. I found the owner and
> they said, "don't worry about it...it's an older bike and no big
> deal."
|
|
|
ARS-is-a-cult@myway.com (The only true Barbara Schwarz - other postings with my name are forgeries) wrote in message
news:<760804b4.0401270833.2ae152ce@posting.google.com>...
> Ever heard of freedom of thoughts?
Sure we have. We have the freedom t
|
|
|
desertphile@cchr.ws (Rev. Desertphile) wrote in message news:<bv6r68$ok13v$9@ID-197010.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> On 27 Jan 2004 08:33:16 -0800, ARS-is-a-cult@myway.com (The only true
> Barbara Schwarz - other postings with my name are forgeries) wrote:
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:44:17 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote
>> >Submitting to bandits just makes them bolder.
>> Bandits are already bold. Not submitting may get you dead. What if
>> yo
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:16:25 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote
>> You made a claim. I asked for stats. I would have thought that
>> you would have had them handy.
>
>A cursory search yiel
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 19:53:41 +0000, Ann <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:29:28 -0800, "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>news:pr-dnZ1p9OPCKYvdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
>>>
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:51:33 +0000, Ann <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:31:36 -0700, "Chas"
><chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>"Ann" <me@privacy.net> wrote
>>> Some people really do think that dying would be better.
>>
>>
|
|
|
salbelmae@hotmail.com (sallie mae) wrote in message news:<e1f5c05d.0401270908.149f245f@posting.google.com>...
> "Stuart O. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in message news:<suna10lihvcidnleugb7lktjg72hkvhta7@4ax.com>...
> > salbelmae@hotmail.com
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:31:36 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Ann" <me@privacy.net> wrote
>> Some people really do think that dying would be better.
>
>Yes ma'am.
>They stand at the ramparts to protect you.
>A simple 'Thank
|
|
|
"jmrandom" <jmmurphy@olemiss.edu> wrote in message news:<bv6hln$p0l11$1@ID-117967.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> "Christopher Green" <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:c31fa7b1.0401271036.5f39e33@posting.google.com...
>
> > I'm guessing Un
|
|
|
Michael Snyder wrote:
> "Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:poud1019qc3usvse4l3mll46g6h6ofbu09@4ax.com...
>
>>On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:39:27 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Here are Marc Lepine's own words
|
|
|
Please visit http://www.startingover2.com/takeourpoll.htm and read a
short narrative of what a man did to protect his girlfriends daughter
only to be ridiculed by her family. Please cast your vote on whether
or not he made the right decision.
Thanks
|
|
|
In article <4016A45D.4EAA8BB0@sprintmail.com>,
Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote:
>"Martin F. Abernathy" wrote:
>
>> Court records reveal Barksdale, 29, as a tormented man convinced that
>> police, the government, gangsters and others
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:29:28 -0800, "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote:
>
>"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:pr-dnZ1p9OPCKYvdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
>> "Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote
>> > >> Bandits are already bold.
|
|
|
In article <7111e10e.0401271023.333e2bcd@posting.google.com>,
Messalina <second@duelingoak.com> wrote:
>
[snip!]
>
>Say it was you. You're making out with a girl, she tries to back out
>of actual sex. You're frustrated, you're mad, but do you use
|
|
|
"Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote
> >> >The stats are all over the web
> >> Then they would be easy for you to produce.
> >No sweat-
> >hate to have to lead you by the hand though.
> You didn't...you just have to be prepared to back up YOUR claim
|
|
|
"Ann" <me@privacy.net> wrote
> >Tell me what you'd think of a man that gave up meekly and abandoned you
to
> >rape because it's 'prudent'.
> That wasn't what we were talking about. We were talking about a woman
> or child choosing not to fight back
|
|
|
"Messalina" <second@duelingoak.com> wrote in message
news:7111e10e.0401271023.333e2bcd@posting.google.com...
> dim@soda.csua.berkeley.edu (D. Gerasimatos) wrote in message
news:<bv4b2j$26g1$1@agate.berkeley.edu>...
> > In article <7111e10e.040126151
|
|
|
"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote
> >Telling them to roll over with their ass in the air is less so.
> That doesn't address his point, but what it *does* do is sound
> uncomfortably like you're saying those who don't fight back are asking
> t
|
|
|
Hopefully, and I seriously doubt it will, it won't come to any legal
proceedings. Thanks for the info. It was informative.
TOTE@dog-play.com wrote in message news:<bv13hj$lrafp$1@ID-80796.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> On 25 Jan 2004 06:03:31 -0800 Jeff
|
|
|
Scott Weiser <HeyCR@kissmyass.org> wrote in message news:<BC3BE9B5.44F7%HeyCR@kissmyass.org>...
> A Usenet persona calling itself Nate Nagel wrote:
>
> > Scott Weiser wrote:
> >
> >>>>> http://www.ibiblio.org/rdu/sl-irrel.html
> >>>>> Federal High
|
|
|
cott Weiser <HeyCR@kissmyass.org> wrote in message news:<BC3BE7F0.44F3%HeyCR@kissmyass.org>...
> A Usenet persona calling itself Nate Nagel wrote:
>
> > Scott Weiser wrote:
> >
> >> A Usenet persona calling itself Nate Nagel wrote:
> >>
> >>> S
|
|
|
MarianneLuban wrote:
> >Subject: Re: has misc.legal.moderated been compromised?
> >From: "David Martel" marte005@earthlink.net
> >Date: 1/27/2004 4:43 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: <OADRb.28004$i4.19567@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
>
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:32:49 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote
>> >Then you know you're asking a nonsense question- you already know what
>the
>> >answer is- and you have some sort of agenda
|
|
|
Laurie S. wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:39:27 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Laurie S. wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:51:51 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Laurie S. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>[...]
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:44:17 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote
>> >Submitting to bandits just makes them bolder.
>> Bandits are already bold. Not submitting may get you dead. What if
>> yo
|
|
|
A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> Scott Weiser wrote:
>
>
>> According to my Mirriam Webster's, it's the number two definition just after
>> 1 : PERPENDICULAR; especially : perpendicular to a tangent at a point of
>> ta
|
|
|
A Usenet persona calling itself C.R. Krieger wrote:
> "Brandon Sommerville" <grimrod@mindless.com.gov> wrote in message
> news:9f93388f9ceaec13954840057d604d61@news.teranews.com...
>
> (Snipping logical argument to Scotty)
>
> Don't bother, Bran
|
|
|
A Usenet persona calling itself C.R. Krieger wrote:
> "Scott Weiser" <HeyCR@kissmyass.org> wrote in message
> news:BC3B0CF6.44B2%HeyCR@kissmyass.org...
>> A Usenet persona calling itself C.R. Krieger wrote:
>>>
>>> I have litigated *and won* sever
|
|
|
Scott Weiser wrote:
> A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
>
> > Scott Weiser wrote:
> >
> >> A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>> The law does NOT define "normality".
> >>
> >> Sure it does.
|
|
|
Scott Weiser wrote:
> A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
>
> > Scott Weiser wrote:
> >
> >
> >> And why, do you suppose, did the local governments lobby to change the law?
> >> Perhaps because they were finding that the "reaso
|
|
|
Scott Weiser wrote:
> A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
>
>
> > No, it doesn't. The law does NOT define "lawful conduct" as "proper and
> > acceptable".
> > It defines conduct OTHER than "lawful conduct" as illegal
> > (u
|
|
|
A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> Scott Weiser wrote:
>
>> A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
>
>>
>>> The law does NOT define "normality".
>>
>> Sure it does. See previous posts for the legal defin
|
|
|
Scott Weiser wrote:
> > It meets your definition of normal.
>
> Hardly. Here's my definition:
>
> 2 : a principle of right action binding upon the members of a group and
> serving to guide, control, or regulate proper and acceptable behavior
|
|
|
A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> Scott Weiser wrote:
>
>
>> And why, do you suppose, did the local governments lobby to change the law?
>> Perhaps because they were finding that the "reasonable and prudent" test was
>> un
|
|
|
A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> Scott Weiser wrote:
>
>> A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
>>
>>> Scott Weiser wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> According to the FHWA, at least 12,000 people were killed becaus
|
|
|
A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> Scott Weiser wrote:
>
>> A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
>>
>>> Scott Weiser wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> As I described before, your definition of "norm" leads to an una
|
|
|
Richard wrote:
> devin.castleton@usu.edu wrote:
>
> > I wanted to get a consensus opinion about how people in this group
feel
> > about the current litigation in our country. Do you think it's out of
> > control or a good use of our rights?
|
|
|
"Lee Carkenord" <carkenord@juno.com> wrote in message
news:4346b55e.0401270438.61035e7f@posting.google.com...
> My Mom is deaf, and afflicted with Parkinson's disease. She is in her
> mid 80's.
> So she is vulnerable.
>
> Lets say that my brother
|
|
|
"Brandon Sommerville" <grimrod@mindless.com.gov> wrote in message
news:9f93388f9ceaec13954840057d604d61@news.teranews.com...
(Snipping logical argument to Scotty)
Don't bother, Brandon. This one is even more obtuse than ol' Lloyd. It
only *appea
|
|
|
In alt.music.mp3 NewB <no1@no.not> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 20:48:25 +0000 (UTC), Alan Pollock
> <nex@nopanix.com> wrote in alt.music.mp3.winmx:
> >In alt.music.mp3 NewB <no1@no.not> wrote:
> >> Moron
> >> by David Rovics
> >
> >> Francoise
|
|
|
"Scott Weiser" <HeyCR@kissmyass.org> wrote in message
news:BC3B0CF6.44B2%HeyCR@kissmyass.org...
> A Usenet persona calling itself C.R. Krieger wrote:
> >
> > I have litigated *and won* several cases where I *stipulated* that my
> > client's speed was
|
|
|
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:21:13 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote
>> >@$#*'em-
>> >Lining up like a sheep to the slaughter doesn't appeal to me.
>> That is not the question. A person has to be
|
