misc.legal

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:54:35 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Given the way you worship Bu#@($o, I can only say that we ought to consider >> the souse. > >Does this mean that Ken is soused, or th

torresD wrote: > > "slim" <pickins486@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message > news:401A7970.FC3B65E2@nyc.rr.com... > > > > > > torresD wrote: > > > > > > "Morf" <central222@hotmail.com > > > > > > > The fact that a young black man has been cut down

"Lt. John Hadily" wrote: > > "drdoody" <drdoody@dieslowly.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<__kSb.11352$hT6.4288@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com>... > > "Morf" <central222@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:4019CAE5.150E@hotmail.com... > > >

drdoody wrote: > > "Morf" <central222@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:4019CAE5.150E@hotmail.com... > > drdoody wrote: > > > > > > "Morf" <central222@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > news:4019B949.5103@hotmail.com... > > > > > > > Onl

>From: no_spam_for_me_thanks@yahoo.com (gil_grissom) >According to my attorney, you are correct. Here is what I found out: > >1) The statute of limitations has run out. >2) Since my wife was the 'victim', we are still married, and she >doesn'

Kibo informs me that Grizzlie Antagonist <grizzlieantagonist@earthlink.net> stated that: >On 30 Jan 2004 06:19:57 GMT, ?????????@?????????.??? (Robert Buchanan) >wrote: > >>Hi, Grizzlie Antagonist! >>> >>>On 30 Jan 2004 04:07:21 GMT, ?????????@??

http://celebrityjustice.warnerbros.com/news/0401/29a.html "Celebrity Justice" has been told the Oregon hotel worker hasn't yet told her story to Colorado prosecutors, but she has told it to at least one Portland man. And even though he doesn't want h

Ken Smith wrote: > Uncle Samuel wrote: >> Let's revisit why you're not licensed to practice law in this state - > Fine. First, show me that you are competent to discuss constitutional law. > Start by explaining the due process vagueness doctrin

Ken Smith wrote: > Given the way you worship Bu#@($o, I can only say that we ought to consider > the souse. Does this mean that Ken is soused, or that he's been hitting the sauce? -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> But what we can safely conclude is that Larson did not adequately prove to >> the court that he was sufficiently harmed by Ken's unethical actions to >> warrant any damages. Larson later appealled,

so i am no longer in the place, my landlord turns away everyone from renting this place. i have no proof but he told me that he has turned down 80% of the people who have called inquiring. he is running an ad in the local paper. what must i do to pr

"informant" <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote in message news:<101k00gr1naln0e@news.supernews.com>... > By popular request, a poll has been commissioned to determine which nickname > is more appropriate when referring to Bullis. > > 1. St00pid > > 2. Fukkkhead

"Christopher Green" <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:c31fa7b1.0401300949.660c1514@posting.google.com... > roger61611@yahoo.com (Roger D) wrote in message news:<ebeed037.0401291255.fe0219b@posting.google.com>... > > Hi, weird question.

"slim" <pickins486@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message news:401A7970.FC3B65E2@nyc.rr.com... > > > torresD wrote: > > > > "Morf" <central222@hotmail.com > > > > > The fact that a young black man has been cut down in > > > the prime of his life is a ve

"Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message news:bvcct70i61@enews4.newsguy.com... > PTRAVEL wrote: > > > > "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message > > news:bvbo1p02b0o@enews3.newsguy.com... > >> dorin wrote: > >> > > >> Hello,

"Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message news:bvce1n0kc0@enews4.newsguy.com... > Extremely common words can not be protected by copyright. > Here we go again. First of all, extremely common words can be protected by copyright if, ta

On 30 Jan 2004 04:03:10 -0800 JL <JL1234@columbia.edu> whittled these words: > TOTE@dog-play.com wrote in message news:<bvcgul$qlo2h$1@ID-80796.news.uni-berlin.de>... >> Was the stipulation of settlement recorded (i.e. made of record in the >> same pl

"Patrick Cairpre" <cairpre409@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:aba9f5d4.0401292322.53c42260@posting.google.com... > Can failure to perform an illegal act ever be a breach of contract or > fraud? If you breach a contract by failure to do an illegal a

On 1/30/04 10:37 AM, in article 300120041137097840%scotts13@comcast.net, "Scott Schuckert" <scotts13@comcast.net> wrote: > In article <4019A5CA.18223.A9AA53E@localhost>, <son_of_sam@hanmail.com> > wrote: > >> @$#* you @$#*er it's misrepresentation

"Alex" <avdeelen.REMOF@wanadoo.nl> wrote > > ...... a small apparent victory for Bryant's > > defense attorneys Pamela Mackey and Harold Haddon, who have been > > fighting to keep those statements away from the public, saying they > > would hurt Bryan

"Tim or Linda" <lt.stttoops@worldnet.att.netremovettforreply> wrote in message news:UfdSb.32864$6O4.891826@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... > How do I find such an attorney the state bar referral number could not help. .. . . I did a search at

Pat, You may enter into a contract for something that is illegal. Such contracts can be breached. The difficulty arises in enforcing such a contract or recovering damages. The courts in the USA will not consider illegal contracts, so you can't tu

Hi, Peter J Ross! > >On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 at 22:28 GMT, TR_ wrote in alt.usenet.kooks: > >>Pecker G ross <fagfly@PAMmenow.org> wrote : >>>Michael Snyder wrote : >>>>"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote: >> >>So the little fruitpunch returns to beg for m

rjjensen@hotmail.com (RJ) wrote in message news:<ec939b78.0401291752.600e740b@posting.google.com>... > My father-in-law remarried a couple of years ago and just recently > passed away. The new wife said that he had no will or pre-nup and > left everyt

"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message news:XfOdnQeBHN6jIofdRVn_iw@comcast.com... > "Allegedly Melissa" <whatever@justguess.com> wrote > > > Wasn't that you? > > Not that I'm aware of. I'm not into domination or slavery of any kind

torresD wrote: > > "Morf" <central222@hotmail.com > > > The fact that a young black man has been cut down in > > the prime of his life is a very, very sad, tragic event. > > > However, unfortunately, minority youths provoke > > fear among

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:56:06 -0800, spammy <spammy@nospam.invalid> wrote: >Sky King <heaystiem@emas.net> says: >>However, fighting back may anger the attacker and cause him/her to >>attack more brutally. > >Resistance is highly correlated with sup

"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:793k101tvt4ot1c58ki8p330nqilk1848i@4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:44:20 GMT, "Michael Snyder" > <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > >"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in mess

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:58:43 -0500, "Allegedly Melissa" <whatever@justguess.com>, wrote: > >"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:401A6FD8.3010005@hotmail.com... >> TR_ wrote: >> > Laurie S. wrote: >> > >> >>tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab

imbibe@mindspring.com (David Polewka) wrote in message news:<44133c84.0401300025.689cdd75@posting.google.com>... > tgdenning@earthlink.net (tg) wrote: > > > Marc Goodman <marc.goodman@comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > David Polewka wrote: > > > >> > >

"Scott Weiser" <HeyCR@kissmyass.org> wrote in message news:BC3F2995.460D%HeyCR@kissmyass.org... > A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > > > > Find a statute defining "reasonable". > > Been there, done that...many times. Apparen

"Scott Weiser" <HeyCR@kissmyass.org> wrote in message news:BC3EF6FC.45C0%HeyCR@kissmyass.org... > A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > > > Scott Weiser wrote: > > > >> Except that by definition if you are speeding, you are not dr

"Allegedly Melissa" <whatever@justguess.com> wrote > ACK another Melissa. She's fun. Active for gun rights, libertarian/objectivist, pagan, polysexual, Jewish, sci-fi, S&M, feminist- a Renaissance woman, if you will ;-) c.

"Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message news:bve66201141@enews4.newsguy.com... > David Loewe, Jr. wrote: > > > > You know, Cain, you idiots have done the impossible. You've made > > Bullis look sympathetic to these folks by your actions.

"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message news:xdKdnVL8E_eiNYfdRVn-sQ@comcast.com... > "Allegedly Melissa" <whatever@justguess.com> wrote > > > Weren't you trying to drum up some domination scenarios with men as the > > > slaves? Tryi

Laurie S. <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<gjsj10drsg54etsb1po1sqk3brjs0778fj@4ax.com>... > On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:16:59 -0800, Michael Snyder > <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: > > >tjab wrote: > >> In article <KwGRb.11170$XF6.223283@typh

Scott Weiser <HeyCR@kissmyass.org> wrote in message news:<BC3EB3EA.45A6%HeyCR@kissmyass.org>... > A Usenet persona calling itself Nate Nagel wrote: > > > Scott Weiser <HeyCR@kissmyass.org> wrote in message > > news:<BC3D444D.4553%HeyCR@kissmyass.org>

"Allegedly Melissa" <whatever@justguess.com> wrote > > Wasn't that you? > Not that I'm aware of. I'm not into domination or slavery of any kind. If > anything I'd have to say I'm more of a submissive type. I'm not into > politics either. Maybe my

"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message news:-eSdnddIEZFYEIfdRVn-ug@comcast.com... > "Allegedly Melissa" <whatever@justguess.com> wrote > > Are all females feminists??? > > Yes. > Bishop Desmond Tutu would call some 'crrreeptofeemi

jab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<bvc7bq$744@rac1.wam.umd.edu>... > In article <KwGRb.11170$XF6.223283@typhoon.sonic.net>, > Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >news:p

tjab wrote: > Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: >>tjab wrote: >>> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Here are Marc Lepine's

"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:<4017FBB8.3CD1E589@sprintmail.com>... > gil_grissom wrote: > > > They usually ask something to the effect of "Have you ever done > > anything illegal for which you were not arrested

David Loewe, Jr. wrote: > You know, Cain, you idiots have done the impossible. You've made > Bullis look sympathetic to these folks by your actions. > -- > "I pissed a lot of people off today. I'm good at that." > -- Alexander Cain

Laurie S. <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<19ng10p9k8oodeafij791l1omvakcg23dc@4ax.com>... > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:03:54 GMT, "Michael Snyder" > <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > >"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in messag

"Allegedly Melissa" <whatever@justguess.com> wrote > > Weren't you trying to drum up some domination scenarios with men as the > > slaves? Trying to connect with like minded women for political action > > against the common oppressor? > When have I do

Richard wrote: > > PTRAVEL wrote: > > > "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message > > news:bvbo1p02b0o@enews3.newsguy.com... > >> dorin wrote: > >> > > >> Hello, > > >> There is a web site with a lot info that I would like use it

Scott Weiser wrote: > > A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > > > Scott Weiser wrote: > >> > >> A Usenet persona calling itself Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > >> > >>> Scott Weiser wrote: > >>> > >>>> Except that by definition if

In article <4019A5CA.18223.A9AA53E@localhost>, <son_of_sam@hanmail.com> wrote: > @$#* you @$#*er it's misrepresentation and is actionable Nice mouth. Care to explain what you think has been misrepresented and why?

Kibo informs me that Grizzlie Antagonist <grizzlieantagonist@earthlink.net> stated that: >On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 08:21:14 +1100, Lionel <nop@alt.net> wrote: > >>Kibo informs me that Grizzlie Antagonist >><grizzlieantagonist@earthlink.net> stated that:

You should speak with a probate attorney where your FIL lived to find out what the law is in that state, and what options are available to you. -- Brett ***************************************************************** * Personal Injury/Malpract