Since you wish to stir up some ancient #@($, let's get the facts straight
here ok?
I made my debut in usenet in 1997.
I made my first post, just to see how it worked, in reply to a spammer.
Immediately, I got my butt chewed out for doing so.
This sparked a six month long argument with ONE idiot.
It just so happened, that he posted into numerous groups that are known

kiddy porn.
I didn't care. Didn't know any better. Where he went, I went right after
him.
In the mean time, I found out newsgroups were a source for images of naked
kids.
Yes tony, I downloaded them and still do.

Yes, tony, I have seen child pornography and have reported it just the

What is done after I report, I don't know, and don't care.
During this time, there was an investigation taking place by various
agencies all over the world.
I had also reposted many of those images I collected, which are LEGAL.

In the fall, it was announced a 12 country simultaneous raid netted 200
distributors of child pornography.
So do you think I was not looked at carefully? Many of those that were
busted, also posted into those same groups. So how did I escape? Because

image I posted was legal.
A short while later I find the group 24hoursupport.helpdesk. Finding out I
liked the group and began posting a few replies as well. Along comes my

nemesis, under the name of phineas p. fog, and posts that I am a

All hell breaks loose.
Since that fateful day I have been browbeaten by worse than you.
I have stood my ground and I'll be damned if I'm gonna back down to you,

any asshole.
Before you go #@&@
in about, "Well posting pictures of naked kids is
illegal".
No it's not. In some countries it is. But not in the USA.
What is illegal is sexual contact. Or the display of private parts purely
for stimulation.
"Moral Crusaders" say that because one enjoys the sight of naked children,
is a menace to society.
The courts, and even psychiatrists, disagree.
The courts have ruled that merely collecting nude images of children does
not make a person a pedophile.
To be a pedophile, one has to have control of a child he is not entitled

Sexual abuse is sometimes, not always, used as a means to control the

Even a woman can be a pedophile.
I have never touched a child as the claims say I have, I have never posed

child for nude images, nor have I distributed child pornography. Nor will

After over four years, nobody, but absolutely nobody, has ever been able

prove any of the charges or claims against me. It is purely used as a

of harassment.
Alex Cain continues to harass me over this issue, yet has no proof to his
claims.
You are now harassing me merely because you are believing the bull#@($

you read.
If what I do is so illegal, then why is the likes of "National Geographic"
and public televsion, and cable shows allowed to air images of naked
children? Why is network tv allowed to air a commercial depicting a butt
naked 2 year old boy or girl?
In the early history of the USA, witch hunting was a common practice.
Who was a witch? Any one anybody felt like naming because they didn't like
that person.
Testing a witch to prove she was or was not, usually wound up killing the
person.
You sir, like alex cain, are no better than any witch hunter of the

regime.
Grow up. Learn the facts before you go jumping on the bandwagon and hang
somebody because you like the crowd. Only to find out later that the

you hanged was innocent.
Prove the charges or shut the @$#* up.

[now posting as "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> ]
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Smith" <spamwanted@127.0.0.1>
Newsgroups: misc.transport.trucking
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 12:51 AM
Subject: Mr. Alpro
for











































same.









































































any
old
pedophile.
or
to.
child.
a
I.
to
means
lies
puritan
person
GUILTY!!1!

tm wrote

<snip #@($>
Will you people PLEASE stop crossposting this #@($ to alt.html. We are fed
up with all of you.