misc.legal

In article <6bd12cd6.0402021858.7f441b9c@posting.google.com>, s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) wrote: > http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylc=X3oDMTBpZmFlcXBpBF9TAzk1ODYxOTQ4BHNlYwN0 > aA--?slug=ap-bryantcase&prov=ap&type=lgns > > Prosecutors an

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 03:02:09 GMT, Sam <sammy@nospammy.com> wrote: >On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 19:00:38 -0700, Laura Bush murdered her boy friend ><> wrote: > >>As this article explains, fingerprints are by no means the foolproof >>form of ID we've been le

Does a will take precedence over a prenuptial agreement. The is a CD that the deceased owned in his name before and during marriage. There's a prenuptial says the premarital assets remain with each party. The will says that the wife is to get 1/2 of

>Subject: Re: Internet free speech legal question >From: Jon Beaver jbeaver@NO.com >Date: 2/3/2004 9:33 AM Pacific Standard Time >Message-id: <qtlv10h01tih0jsbnfc7dnrrret13agmu1@4ax.com> > >On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:00:05 -0600, "Richard" <anonymous@127

test

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:56:27 -0700, "Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote: >"Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote >> MOST women do not want to have sex within a short time after they have >> been raped. > >And of course you have a cite for s

On 3 Feb 2004 22:33:04 -0800, s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) wrote: >http://www.vaildaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040203/BREAKING/402030151 > >About the only of Bryant's responses Ruckriegle allowed Tuesday was a >description by an under

"Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote > > You've got data? > I don't need it. Do you really believe what you said? I think you do, but > I'm giving you an out here. I was mocking you; consider it rhetorical c.

Does a will negate a pre-nuptial agreement? There is a pre-nuptial agreement saying that what belongs to each before marriage remains theirs. In the will the deceased spouse leaves 1/2 of the premarital assets assets to the widow and 1/2 to the chi

>Subject: Re: Internet free speech legal question >From: "Arthur L. Rubin" ronnirubin@sprintmail.com >Date: 2/3/2004 9:57 AM Pacific Standard Time >Message-id: <401FE0F7.DFF0A95C@sprintmail.com> > >Katherine Griffis-Greenberg wrote: > >> Reporting

http://www.vaildaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040203/BREAKING/402030151 About the only of Bryant's responses Ruckriegle allowed Tuesday was a description by an undercover detective that Bryant "seemed upset" when he accompanied Winters and Lo

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:29:19 -0700, "Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote: >"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote >> >Well; I'm reading it in 'misc.legal', so I don't particularly carry the >PC >> >baggage that seems endemic to your grou

"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote > > The Concierge is *precisely* who would visit a guests room in order to > > provide a service of the hotel. > That's all well and good, but she didn't go there to deliver a message. She told the other e

"Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote > There are MANY investigative reporters, both in print and electronic media, > and they are not all weasels. You've got data? > Journalism is an honorable profession, and so > is investigative journalism. Wel

"geodav" <geodav@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:40206927.2080203@bellsouth.net... > Does a will negate a pre-nuptial agreement? There is a pre-nuptial > agreement saying that what belongs to each before marriage remains > theirs. In the will

A client has refused to pay two invoices for consulting work. In CA, does anyone have an idea about the following two questions: [1] County of jurisdiction. I did most of the work in one county, but the client is in another county, where the "produ

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 20:35:26 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> [blather] > >> Pooooooooor Teddi. He can't tender a substantive response ... > >To what? There m

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:18:56 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > you are one sick mo-fo. But >then again, we already knew that. Even the Examiners' Board of the Colorado >Bar Association was able to see that. Ain't th

"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message news:4-adnZyWtKVWGL3d4p2dnA@comcast.com... > "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote > > > You've got data? > > I don't need it. Do you really believe what you said? I think you do, but > > I'm givi

"Lee Watkins" <spamisforsandwiches-lwatkins@falcon.tamucc.edu> wrote in message news:bvp2li$6on$1@news.tamu.edu... > and only one man. > yet the defense wants to impose the "shes a lying slut" defense. a tad > hypocrital, eh? No more hypocritica

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:12:05 -0700, "Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote: >"1" <1@1.com> wrote >> Having consensual intercourse within less than 36hrs after being brutally >> raped? > >You know, I was very surprised at that, on an anecdotal

"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message news:EOudnWQpAct44r3d4p2dnA@comcast.com... > "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote > > There are MANY investigative reporters, both in print and electronic > media, > > and they are not all weasels

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:29:52 -0600, "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote: > s_knight8 wrote: > > > http://www.thedenverchannel.com/kobebryanttrial/2812198/detail.html > > > By Craig Silverman, 7NEWS Legal Analyst > > I heard from Court TV this mor

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:35:53 -0600, "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote: > s_knight8 wrote: > > > http://www.portlandtribune.com/archview.cgi?id=22909 > > > The following excerpt is from the forthcoming book "Kobe Bryant: The > > Game of His Life

"s_knight8" <s_knight8@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:6bd12cd6.0402021917.634e434d@posting.google.com... > http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/160623p-140879c.html > > Kobe Bryant allegedly sat silent for 30 seconds when cops first asked > h

"C. S. P. Schofield" <cspschofield@erols.com> wrote in message news:BC45AE6E.EE25%cspschofield@erols.com... > in article yWWTb.801$%22.61715@news.uswest.net, => Vox Populi © at > vox@popu.li wrote on 2/3/04 7:21 PM: > > > C. S. P. Schofield wrote

his is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030002040806040606050707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrot

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken, they have NO hard evidence. > Says you. Who, unlike you, is familiar with the case. > As for me, I'll wait for the evidence in court -- not that I care all that > much. So what's with

his is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080005090205060003060807 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> [blather] > Pooooooooor Teddi. He can't tender a substantive response ... To what? There must first necessarily be substantive content before one can substantively respond to it. Why do you

In article <gh50205hvgekoh4e7lbgth1a4134g1n5do@4ax.com>, Sky King <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote: >> >MOST women do not want to have sex within a short time after they have >been raped. And your basis for this is?

and you are going to prove in court who was actually at the keyboard exactly HOW???????? "Lady Veteran" <see.msg@4.email.addy.com> wrote in message news:0HGEZ3PT38014.5278009259@Gilgamesh-Frog.org... > I amplanning to sue an indididual who has cyb

"Gary Collard" <garycollard@netscape.net> wrote in message news:401FF88E.5789F7CB@netscape.net... > Richard wrote: > > > > s_knight8 wrote: > > > > > http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylc=X3oDMTBpZmFlcXBpBF9TAzk1ODYxOTQ4BHN > > > lYwN0aA--?sl

x-no-archive: yes "Bo Raxo" <CheneysHeartIs@deathsdoor.com> wrote in message news:81bfcfe1.0402031755.3842d21d@posting.google.com... > s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) wrote in message news:<6bd12cd6.0402030838.3b90e90b@posting.google.com>... > > ht

The more you hear about it, the more this book sounds like just a smear job. Sad, but I guess even weasels have to make a living. s_knight8 wrote: > > http://www.thedenverchannel.com/kobebryanttrial/2812198/detail.html > > By Craig Silverman, 7

"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message news:IbOdndPzB9DVY4LdRVn-ig@comcast.com... > "Gary Collard" <garycollard@netscape.net> wrote > > The more you hear about it, the more this book sounds like just a smear > > job. Sad, but I gue

"Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in news:bvop7k01ubf@enews2.newsguy.com: > Shapiro should have his book banned from being published and sold. Sure. In fact, we should probably just #@($can the whole Bill of Rights, just for Kobe. -- --Rob

s_knight8 wrote: > > "Did she ever say 'no'?" the investigator pressed. "No," Bryant > replied after his long pause. Well, at least the he said and she said agreed on this point. > The accuser says she repeatedly shouted "no" and the book descri

"Sky King" <heaystiem@emas.net> wrote > >> MOST women do not want to have sex within a short time after they have > >> been raped. > >And of course you have a cite for such a strongly worded point- > >yes? > Over 20 years as a therapist who has had r

Richard wrote: > > s_knight8 wrote: > > > http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylc=X3oDMTBpZmFlcXBpBF9TAzk1ODYxOTQ4BHN > > lYwN0aA--?slug=ap-bryantcase&prov=ap&type=lgns > > > Prosecutors and defense attorneys questioned at least seven witnesse

"Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote > > What do you think 'delivering messages' means? > I don't think "delivering a message" and "visiting" are the same thing....is > that what you think? The Concierge is *precisely* who would visit a guests room in

>I'm a business owner, and have owned my current business for just >under 2 years. It is locally targeted, and is well known in the area. >About 4 months ago, another company began using an "almost" identical >name, offering an identical service. I had

Just testing. I've never used this before. pleas e 1gn0re

"Doltan the Magnificent Flounder" <xanthian@well.com> wrote: >"David James Polewka" <joseywales@outlaw.nospam> wrote: > >> Did these cases get reported as "died after a long illness?" > >One thing should make you perky then, your own death will >c

In article <bvoq3g01v7o@enews2.newsguy.com> "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> writes: >If the RIAA ever comes after me, they'll be in court for damn sure. >Because they will have to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that I >downloaded the stuff onto my mac

http://tinyurl.com/229fo ---------------------------------------------------------------- Your defense of the HypnoWHORE notwithstanding, your daughter still isn't coming back, John. http://tinyurl.com/ysrvt ----------------------------------------

... steve sullivan <steve@spamhotmail.com> wrote in message news:<steve-5AA328.15515503022004@news.sf.sbcglobal.net>... > In article <6bd12cd6.0402021858.7f441b9c@posting.google.com>, > s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) wrote: > > > http://sports.y

"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message news:bvm0ei$m97@rac2.wam.umd.edu... > In article <%5vTb.12228$XF6.238359@typhoon.sonic.net>, > Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >"s_knight8" <s_knight8@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >new

So the phone number to reach Scott Richter is 303-550 9828. Scott Richter's phone number: (303) 550 9828 Scott Richter, phoneno: 303 550 9828 OptinRealBig.com phone number: 303-550-9828 The phone number for Scott Richter is (303)-550-9828

"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message news:pYednZ0DXcXtx73dRVn-ug@comcast.com... > "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote > > > What do you think 'delivering messages' means? > > I don't think "delivering a message" and "visiting" are th