misc.legal

> Robert Miller wrote: > > > Does someone lose their U.S. citizenship if they swear an oath to a > > foriegn government or governmental agency? > > Robert Miller > Hmm... Would you be ging after the Catholics? > Or maybe the Episcopalians this ti

cbreitel wrote: > jrosenbluth@att.com (Josh Rosenbluth) wrote in message > >>That paragraph, taken together with the declaration in your quotes >>that marriage is "one of the 'basic civil rights of man', fundamental >>to our very existence" and th

"Jeff Davis" <luzer15@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:xNadnT3Ee52YXLzdRVn-hg@comcast.com... > > "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message > news:fEdUb.12617$XF6.244723@typhoon.sonic.net... > > > > "tinydancer" <tinydancer@nospam.co

Caroline wrote: > "Josh Rosenbluth" <jrosenbluth@att.com> wrote > >>"Caroline" <caroline10027remove@earthlink.net> wrote >> >>>"Josh Rosenbluth" <jrosenbluth@att.com> wrote >>> >>>>charlesbreitel@yahoo.com (cbreitel) wrote >>>> >>>>>Josh Rosenbl

cbreitel wrote: > jrosenbluth@att.com (Josh Rosenbluth) wrote in message news:<d735d9de.0402040655.4eaa8818@posting.google.com>... > >>>I disagree. The issue in Lawrence was whether there is a Due Process >>>right for consenting adults to engage in p

Californians Can Vote While Cruising Mall Wed Feb 4,10:05 AM ET SANTA ANA, Calif. -- In between visits to the Gap, Cinnabon and Victoria's Secret, why not choose a president? Voting kiosks installed at six Orange County malls will allow re

In article <bvsag201mqt@enews4.newsguy.com>, Richard <anonymous@127.000> wrote: > >Not to mention the fact no grand jury was convened for determining the >validity of a search warrant as is required by the US Constitution. rotfl

In article <RdhUb.12667$XF6.245221@typhoon.sonic.net>, Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: > >"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message >news:dbWdnfddqdEBEbzdRVn-sQ@comcast.com... >> "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote >> > But whe

"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message news:fEdUb.12617$XF6.244723@typhoon.sonic.net... > > "tinydancer" <tinydancer@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:NmcUb.3994$Rl4.2157@bignews5.bellsouth.net... > > > [...] > > > > > > "It was

Raqui wrote: > > "Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:A-SdnVDMs4cq273dRVn-uw@comcast.com... > > "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote > > > Concierge (n) > > > A staff member of a hotel or apartment complex who assists guests o

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:26:18 -0600, "David W." <usenet@walc.com.pluto> wrote: >"Stephen Hyde" <swhyde_ug@hotmail.com> wrote in >news:cuqdnXI2X9xiV4LdRVn-hA@comcast.com: > >> ok, the whole picture here, is that my ex (the petitioner) has had her >

KLM wrote: > > x-no-archive: yes > "tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message > news:bvp11b$fhr@rac3.wam.umd.edu... > > In article <101vt8g7742995c@news.supernews.com>, > > KLM <nonospammer@com.com> wrote: > > >"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in m

"tinydancer" <tinydancer@nospam.com> wrote in message news:NmcUb.3994$Rl4.2157@bignews5.bellsouth.net... > [...] > > > > > "It was consensual." > > > > > > > > How many women out there would find being bent over a chair > > > > and @$#*ed for FIV

Uncle Samuel <stars@bars> wrote in message news:<irb220pklnl0otbbl25o4fdea513mr8vfb@4ax.com>... > On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 16:34:25 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > > That reads like libel to me counselor, I'll archive that for > background instabi

Subject: Re: Internet free speech legal question >From: Katherine Griffis-Greenberg egylist@REMOVETHISgriffis-consulting.com >Date: 2/4/2004 3:21 AM Pacific Standard Time >Message-id: <9tk120pvmb06om2m55jclbkr5vpsneod1f@4ax.com> > >On 04 Feb 2004 02

"steve sullivan" <steve@spamhotmail.com> wrote in message news:steve-C94E7A.01171104022004@news.sf.sbcglobal.net... > In article <vC1Ub.11471$F23.9530@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, > "Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us@thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote:

Raqui wrote: > > "Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:IbOdndPzB9DVY4LdRVn-ig@comcast.com... > > "Gary Collard" <garycollard@netscape.net> wrote > > > The more you hear about it, the more this book sounds like just a smear

Betty, Many attorneys will give a free initial consult. Tell your story to a few attorneys and see if any will take your case on a contingency basis. Be sure that you fully understand what fees and expenses for which you will be liable. Good l

[someone wrote] > >> The Concierge is *precisely* who would visit a guests room in order to > >> provide a service of the hotel. The Concierge is the liaison between the > >> hotel and the guest- when you have a problem with the hotel, you call the

s_knight8 wrote: > http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/news_columnists/article/0,1299,DRMN > _86_2627842,00.html > While the prosecutors did their best Tuesday to depict the discussions > between Bryant and the detectives as a "consensual in

http://www.gjsentinel.com/news/newsfd/auto/feed/news/2004/02/04/1075907949.26609.7112.5866.%20html;COXnetJSessionID=AhgXLvR81TzvnTrNmlRcVT334tgN<br%20/>kjhsecA9fmX1E0cguUYU0vj1!-288763931?urac=n&urvf=10759128552460.13320828361307013 Loya told the court

Robert Miller wrote: > Does someone lose their U.S. citizenship if they swear an oath to a > foriegn government or governmental agency? > Robert Miller > Member of www.norfed.org > Bringing America back to value $1 at a time! Not necess

"Josh Rosenbluth" <jrosenbluth@att.com> wrote > "Caroline" <caroline10027remove@earthlink.net> wrote > > "Josh Rosenbluth" <jrosenbluth@att.com> wrote > > > charlesbreitel@yahoo.com (cbreitel) wrote > > > > Josh Rosenbluth <joshrosenbluth@att.net> wro

"Ruben Patterson and Chris Mihm Both Posterized Snaq" <HowCanTh@t.Be??> wrote in message news:38h12099pfqpfvshqj7tvtfipcopa62vjs@posting.google.com... > On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:00:43 -0800, "Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> blurted: > > > > >"Chas" <chasclem

"Cliff and Linda Griffith" <grifftex@charter.net> wrote > I just now called my friend's son, who was a Concierge in the Adam's Mark in > Dallas. Remember that the Adams Mark is not a residence spa in a tourist town- it serves probably one third the

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004, "Howdy" <nospam@nothere.com> wrote: > 2 people are on the home property title. In the title, > there is NO saying that whether these 2 people are > joint tenant, tenant in common, ect, etc. How is this > translate to who owns wh

robeml6@aol.com (Robert Miller) wrote in message news:<20040204184746.22711.00000939@mb-m19.aol.com>... > > Robert Miller wrote: [snip] > I'll ask the question and make it more simple to understand. If I swear > an oath of loyalty to a Chinese Trade

"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message news:KrmdncPT3uX17rzd4p2dnA@comcast.com... > "Gary Collard" <garycollard@netscape.net> wrote > > Not at all - the delivery would be by phone, whole the guest is on the way > > on, or very rare

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:34:59 -0700, "Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote: >"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote >>.....People are simply saying that >> submitting might be the wisest choice in some circumstances. > >'might', 'some'?

"Jeff Davis" <luzer15@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:5p-dnavT5aja3bzdRVn-tA@comcast.com... > > "Alex" <avdeelen.REMOF@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message > news:40206d87$0$32730$4a441750@news.euronet.nl... > > > > "Jeff Davis" <luzer15@hotmail.com> s

"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote\ > > One may speculate about it, but she certainly was authorized to be where > she was. > Not with the door closed. Irrelevant to her job description- One may speculate about her intentions- and even abo

"Cliff and Linda Griffith" <grifftex@charter.net> wrote in message news:1023bu5ltkpmj89@corp.supernews.com... > [someone wrote] > > > >> The Concierge is *precisely* who would visit a guests room in order to > > >> provide a service of the hotel.

Ok, so I am extremely unhappy with my home builder, US Homes. I want to put a big sign on my window facing the street that says this: "If you purchase a US Home do not sign any papers until ALL exceptions have been fixed! If you do, it could take mon

Does someone lose their U.S. citizenship if they swear an oath to a foriegn government or governmental agency? Robert Miller Member of www.norfed.org Bringing America back to value $1 at a time!

> In article <101ulhksilth2f6@news.supernews.com>, > KLM <nonospammer@com.com> wrote: > > > >Why would you think that? I doubt he was interested in trying to please a > >one night stand. What man is interested in doing that? > > Male basher. (B

"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message news:hKKdnbiTfpHiO7zdRVn-hw@comcast.com... > "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote\ > > > One may speculate about it, but she certainly was authorized to be where > > she was. > > Not w

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > SolarChase wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote > > >>>"What "evidence"? (Hint: there ain't any. All the prosecutor has is a >>>"hired gun" who was paid to say what the prosecutor needed him to say.)" >>Ahhhhhhh, yes.

heodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> >>>>>Ken, they have NO hard evidence. >>>> >>>>Says you. >>> >>>Who, unlike you, is familiar with the case. >> >>And,

Nothing wrong with it at all. I have a condition that requires me to exploit all possible advantages presented to me. As it turns out, my practice of cutting through lots to avoid long signals is in fact illegal (from what I have read here)--because

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 22:38:15 -0500, geodav <geodav@bellsouth.net> wrote: >Does a will negate a pre-nuptial agreement? There is a pre-nuptial >agreement saying that what belongs to each before marriage remains >theirs. In the will the deceased spo

"Raqui" <WestCoast@TV.com> wrote > But where does it say she was there on "hotel" business? In her corroborated report that says she identified that she had 'one more errand' as she clocked out. One may speculate about it, but she certainly was auth

"tinydancer" <tinydancer@nospam.com> wrote in message news:4tgUb.4233$UF1.2580@bignews6.bellsouth.net... > > "Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:KrmdncPT3uX17rzd4p2dnA@comcast.com... > > "Gary Collard" <garycollard@netsca

On 04 Feb 2004 in alt.support.stop-smoking, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> made his/her contribution to mankind by stating in news:Fe9Ub.22$BD3.41773@news.uswest.net: <snip> > > Lynch said the state went forward with the warrant because it stood

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>Ken, they have NO hard evidence. >>Says you. > > Who, unlike you, is familiar with the case. Discussing the case three months ago, someone presumptively familia

Lee Hollaar wrote: > In article <dGhpc2lzbWU=.0fa0e63a3704125057db7a738c5ae277@1075755773.nulluser.com> thisisme <thisisme@cotse.net> writes: > >It's interesting to contemplate how one would go > >about enforcing a patent on a game. It would not

Uncle Samuel wrote: > On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:58:57 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >>>Why do you think the 10th Circuit didn't respond to much of your voluminous >>>complaint? >> >> Because judges, like Cathol

Robert Miller wrote: > Does someone lose their U.S. citizenship if they swear an oath to a foriegn > government or governmental agency? > Robert Miller Hmm... Would you be ging after the Catholics? Or maybe the Episcopalians this time? > Me

"Gary Collard" <garycollard@netscape.net> wrote in message news:40216BA6.50775722@netscape.net... > Raqui wrote: > > > > "Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:A-SdnVDMs4cq273dRVn-uw@comcast.com... > > > "Raqui" <WestCoas