|
This is it folks. The smoking gun that proves that in the late 1990s
bush got the national guard to go into his file and make changes.
Here's an excerpt. Bush is history.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-02-11-bush-guard-usat_x.htm
By Dave Moniz and Jim Drinkard, USA TODAY 2-11-2004
WASHINGTON As Texas Gov. George W. Bush prepared to run for
president in the late 1990s, top-ranking Texas National Guard officers
and Bush advisers discussed ways to limit the release of potentially
embarrassing details from Bush's military records, a former senior
officer of the Texas Guard said Wednesday.
A second former Texas Guard official, who spoke only on condition of
anonymity, was told by a participant that commanders and Bush advisers
were particularly worried about mentions in the records of arrests of
Bush before he joined the National Guard in 1968, the second official
said.
Bill Burkett, then a top adviser to the state Guard commander, said he
overheard conversations in which superiors discussed "cleansing" the
file of damaging information.
The White House dismissed Burkett's charge Wednesday. It is an
"outrageously false statement," said White House communications
director Dan Bartlett, who handled the records in the late 1990s as an
aide to Gov. Bush. Administration officials dismiss Burkett as a
disgruntled former Guardsman who had a falling-out with his superiors.
Two forms in Bush's publicly released military files his enlistment
application and a background check contain blacked-out entries in
response to questions about arrests or convictions. Bush acknowledged
in biographies published in 1999 that he was arrested twice before he
enlisted in the Air National Guard: once for stealing a wreath and
another time for rowdiness at a Yale-Princeton football game.
|
| |
| |
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
This is it folks. The smoking gun that proves that in the late 1990s
bush got the national guard to go into his file and make changes.
Here's an excerpt. Bush is history.
It's the same story about his (alleged) cocaine use. Records seem to
amazingly disappear, or suddenly appear innocuous.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-02-11-bush-guard-usat_x.htm
By Dave Moniz and Jim Drinkard, USA TODAY 2-11-2004
WASHINGTON As Texas Gov. George W. Bush prepared to run for
president in the late 1990s, top-ranking Texas National Guard officers
and Bush advisers discussed ways to limit the release of potentially
embarrassing details from Bush's military records, a former senior
officer of the Texas Guard said Wednesday.
A second former Texas Guard official, who spoke only on condition of
anonymity, was told by a participant that commanders and Bush advisers
were particularly worried about mentions in the records of arrests of
Bush before he joined the National Guard in 1968, the second official
said.
Bill Burkett, then a top adviser to the state Guard commander, said he
overheard conversations in which superiors discussed "cleansing" the
file of damaging information.
The White House dismissed Burkett's charge Wednesday. It is an
"outrageously false statement," said White House communications
director Dan Bartlett, who handled the records in the late 1990s as an
aide to Gov. Bush. Administration officials dismiss Burkett as a
disgruntled former Guardsman who had a falling-out with his superiors.
Two forms in Bush's publicly released military files his enlistment
application and a background check contain blacked-out entries in
response to questions about arrests or convictions. Bush acknowledged
in biographies published in 1999 that he was arrested twice before he
enlisted in the Air National Guard: once for stealing a wreath and
another time for rowdiness at a Yale-Princeton football game.
|
| |
| |
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:38:52 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
It's the same story about his (alleged) cocaine use.
How long have you been beating your wife kenny boy?
|
| |
| |
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:38:52 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
How long have you been beating your wife kenny boy?
I taught her to play golf some twenty years ago, but she's busted off
a few 79s recently, which occasionally beats me. :)
|
| |
| |
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:55:33 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
I taught her to play golf some twenty years ago, but she's busted off
a few 79s recently, which occasionally beats me. :)
Lol, decent volley.
How long have you been hitting her?
|
| |
| |
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:55:33 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
Lol, decent volley.
How long have you been hitting her?
I'm not always the soundest sleeper, so I'd say I give her a nudge or
two every night. :)
How long have you been sucking Ted Kaldis' dick? He's been bragging
about 'getting it' recently, and you seem like you're the only possible
candidate....
|
| |
| |
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 02:13:16 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
I'm not always the soundest sleeper, so I'd say I give her a nudge or
two every night. :)
Lol, better yet!
How many domestic violence reports are there on you?
How long have you been sucking Ted Kaldis' dick? He's been bragging
about 'getting it' recently, and you seem like you're the only possible
candidate....
You mean you're going straight now?
|
| |
| |
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 02:13:16 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
Lol, better yet!
How many domestic violence reports are there on you?
Zero, of course! Now, how's 'bout George W. Bush answering all those
nasty questions about how he got wildly preferential treatment in one of
the ANG's champagne batallions? A lie-detector test with respect to his
alleged cocaine abuse would also be valuable. And while they're at it,
what about the rest of the chicken#@($-hawks in the Bush Administration?
How long have you been sucking Ted Kaldis' dick? He's been bragging
about 'getting it' recently, and you seem like you're the only possible
candidate....
You mean you're going straight now?
Been there all my life. Et tu, Unk? Do you wear stars at bars (like
Hooters)?
|
| |
| |
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:35:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
Zero, of course!
Really?
Now, how's 'bout George W. Bush answering all those
nasty questions about how he got wildly preferential treatment in one of
the ANG's champagne batallions? A lie-detector test with respect to his
alleged cocaine abuse would also be valuable. And while they're at it,
what about the rest of the chicken#@($-hawks in the Bush Administration?
You are such a dnc partisan #@($head kenny boy, the "alleged"
republican...
How long have you been sucking Ted Kaldis' dick? He's been bragging
about 'getting it' recently, and you seem like you're the only possible
candidate....
You mean you're going straight now?
Been there all my life.
I doubt that.
Et tu, Unk? Do you wear stars at bars (like
Hooters)?
I don't frequent bars, they stink.
|
| |
| |
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:35:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
Really?
Really. You live in Colorado; go look it up.
Of course, the most obvious reason for your anonymity is your record
of criminal activity. Prostitution, drug arrests, petty theft -- what
secrets are you hiding, Sham?
Now, how's 'bout George W. Bush answering all those
nasty questions about how he got wildly preferential treatment in one of
the ANG's champagne batallions? A lie-detector test with respect to his
alleged cocaine abuse would also be valuable. And while they're at it,
what about the rest of the chicken#@($-hawks in the Bush Administration?
You are such a dnc partisan #@($head kenny boy, the "alleged"
republican...
It's a matter of public record, cowgirl. Sucks for you.
And I think you're a dnc plant, lurking here to make the Party look
stupid -- not that Shrub isn't doing a bang-up job of it....
How long have you been sucking Ted Kaldis' dick? He's been bragging
about 'getting it' recently, and you seem like you're the only possible
candidate....
You mean you're going straight now?
Been there all my life.
I doubt that.
I don't frequent bars, they stink.
I see. You only whore at higher-priced establishments.... :)
|
| |
| |
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:10:15 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
Really. You live in Colorado; go look it up.
Nah, you prove it.
Of course, the most obvious reason for your anonymity is your record
of criminal activity. Prostitution, drug arrests, petty theft -- what
secrets are you hiding, Sham?
Long term parking ticket woes.
Now, how's 'bout George W. Bush answering all those
nasty questions about how he got wildly preferential treatment in one of
the ANG's champagne batallions? A lie-detector test with respect to his
alleged cocaine abuse would also be valuable. And while they're at it,
what about the rest of the chicken#@($-hawks in the Bush Administration?
It's a matter of public record, cowgirl. Sucks for you.
Cite!
And I think you're a dnc plant, lurking here to make the Party look
stupid -- not that Shrub isn't doing a bang-up job of it....
DNC operative, begone.
How long have you been sucking Ted Kaldis' dick? He's been bragging
about 'getting it' recently, and you seem like you're the only possible
candidate....
You mean you're going straight now?
Been there all my life.
I doubt that.
Et tu, Unk? Do you wear stars at bars (like
Hooters)?
I don't frequent bars, they stink.
I see.
That's be a first!
You only whore at higher-priced establishments.... :)
Nah, that's your game, DNC partyboy.
|
| |
| |
Ken Smith wrote:
Now, how's 'bout George W. Bush answering all those
nasty questions about how he got wildly preferential treatment in one of
the ANG's champagne batallions?
The record doesn't show he had preferential treatment. It doesn't show
that he didn't, either..
|
| |
| |
Ken Smith wrote:
The record doesn't show he had preferential treatment. It doesn't show
that he didn't, either..
Yes, it does show he got the preference of a patrician and nobility, despite
laws to the contrary. The dull young Prince George , and mediocre student
with low average grades, was advanced to the front of the line, ahead of
sterling candidates much more qualified than he was. As you may recall
(well, probably not you) our young prince scored an abysmal 25% on his entry
tests.
|
| |
| |
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:54:33 -0500, " jls" <jls1016ns@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
Yes, it does
No it doesn't you pinhead.
|
| |
| |
ls wrote:
Yes, it does show he got the preference of a patrician and nobility, despite
laws to the contrary. The dull young Prince George , and mediocre student
with low average grades, was advanced to the front of the line, ahead of
sterling candidates much more qualified than he was. As you may recall
(well, probably not you) our young prince scored an abysmal 25% on his entry
tests.
I recall that one, too. I'd rather have a John McCain almost
anywhere over Shrub.
Speaking of which, can we trade him for Tony Blair and a player to be
named later?
|
| |
| |
|
