From: "cornchucker" <corn@corn.pit>
Newsgroups: supernews.general
Subject: who is this informant jerk?
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:49:55 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
I've noticed that some jackass who uses the nic "informant" and goes
into
various groups claiming this guy he stalks is a pedophile and just
basically, is, welllll, for the lack of a better term, an asshole.
He just does not give a #@($ that he's flagrantly violating various
rules of
usenet.
Only Bullis would claim someone would be violating "rules of Usenet."
Today I noticed he posted into numerous unrelated groups with his
propaganda
against this other guy.
And of course as usual it's "propaganda," never mind the fact that
everything can be backed up with timestamps and logged headers.
What does misc.legal, where he started, have in common with
alt.mobilehome,
alt.tv.stargate-sg1, and even misc.transport.trucking?
The common denominator appears that these are groups in which this
other guy
posts.
Now doesn't supernews have a policy about crossposting material
unrelated to
other groups?
Not to mention a policy on stalking, hate posts, and perhaps even
things
which might be considered libel?
*snicker*
What's the supernews official stance on abusers like this informant
jerk?
"freedom of speech" rules and supernews doesn't give a #@($?
Pay the bill and we don't care?
Well speak up supernews.
